[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: 8193266: AArch64: TestOptionsWithRanges.java SIGSEGV

[Stuart Monteith]

Hello,
	Would it be possible for this to be reviewed? I'd like to get it in for
JDK11. I don't believe there were any outstanding issues.

I've updated and reapplied the patch against current jdk/hs

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smonteith/8193266/webrev-6/

Thanks,
    Stuart


On 11/01/18 08:20, Rahul Raghavan wrote:
> < Just resending below review request email from Stuart for 8193266
> including aarch64-port-dev also. Thanks.>
> 
> 
> -- On Saturday 06 January 2018 12:13 AM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
> I've removed the AARCH64 conditionals, added the empty line I removed,
> and changed the type of "use_XOR_for_compressed_class_base" to bool.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smonteith/8193266/webrev-5/
> 
> BR,
>     Stuart
> 
>> On 4 January 2018 at 14:45, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 04/01/18 14:26, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>>   I was going to offer to sponsor this since it touches shared code but
>>>> I'm not sure I like that there's AARCH64 specific code in
>>>> universe.cpp/hpp.   And the name is somewhat offputting, suggesting
>>>> implementation details of one target leaking into shared code.
>>>>
>>>> set_use_XOR_for_compressed_class_base
>>>>
>>>> I think webrev-3 looked more reasonable, and could elide the #ifdef
>>>> AARCH64 in the shared code for that version.   And the indentation is
>>>> better.
>>>
>>> I hate the #ifdef AARCH64 stuff too, but it's always a sign that there
>>> is something wrong with the front-end to back-end modularization.  We
>>> can handle the use_XOR_for_compressed_class_base later: we really
>>> should have a way to communicate with the back ends when the memory
>>> layout is initialized.  We can go with webrev-3.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Andrew Haley
>>> Java Platform Lead Engineer
>>> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
>>> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671