[aarch64-port-dev ] Some benchmarking help required
Dmitry Chuyko
dmitry.chuyko at bell-sw.com
Mon May 21 14:58:45 UTC 2018
Some numbers for fixed patch #2
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/aarch64_8203006-3.patch :
==T88
Benchmark #2 % p
compress -1.32 0.005
crypto.aes -3.38 0.000
crypto.signverify 0.80 0.043
derby -3.51 0.000
mpegaudio 0.95 0.007
scimark.sor.large 5.33 0.000
scimark.lu.small -6.42 0.000
xml.transform -3.52 0.000
xml.validation -1.53 0.045
==T99
Benchmark #2 % p
compress 2.86 0.041
crypto.rsa -0.86 0.032
scimark.fft.small -0.64 0.015
scimark.lu.small 10.82 0.011
scimark.sparse.small -5.32 0.000
scimark.monte_carlo 1.39 0.030
sunflow 1.04 0.007
No failed runs but also no univocal improvement (in contrast with #1)
while the difference is present.
I also made runs with merged patch, the numbers:
==T88
Benchmark #1#2 % p
compress -1.35 0.000
crypto.aes 29.42 0.000
crypto.signverify 1.13 0.047
derby -1.48 0.042
mpegaudio 3.14 0.000
scimark.sor.large 5.35 0.000
scimark.sparse.large -4.01 0.000
scimark.lu.small -23.97 0.000
scimark.sparse.small -4.64 0.000
serial 2.56 0.034
sunflow 1.81 0.000
xml.transform 11.49 0.000
==T99
Benchmark #1#2 % p
crypto.aes 26.08 0.000
crypto.rsa 1.87 0.000
crypto.signverify 0.71 0.000
mpegaudio 16.61 0.000
scimark.sor.large 0.57 0.031
scimark.sparse.large 19.02 0.023
scimark.fft.small -0.86 0.002
scimark.sor.small 8.51 0.000
scimark.sparse.small -1.54 0.019
scimark.monte_carlo 7.68 0.000
sunflow 4.59 0.000
xml.transform 4.38 0.000
xml.validation 1.33 0.003
On T99 lu.small and derby shown insignificant -3-4%. And sparse.large
shown insignificant +10-30% with #1 and #2.
-Dmitry
On 05/16/2018 05:44 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> ..................................
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list