[aarch64-port-dev ] Some benchmarking help required

White, Derek Derek.White at cavium.com
Wed May 23 22:42:28 UTC 2018


Hi Andrew,

The P1 patch is looking pretty good on T99.

Taking a median of 3 runs in each config, we get:
Andrew Haley's Patches - Median scores, relative to Clean:
JDK	Max	Critical
jdk11-clean	1.00	1.00
jdk11-p1	1.02	1.08
jdk11-p1p2	1.01	1.04

Looking at "best of 3 runs":
JDK	Max	Critical
jdk11-clean	1.00	1.00
jdk11-p1	1.01	1.07
jdk11-p1p2	1.00	0.99

Note that we normally do 4-5 runs, but time was tight. For completeness I'm doing the p2 runs now. 

 - Derek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aarch64-port-dev [mailto:aarch64-port-dev-
> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of White, Derek
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 2:14 PM
> To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>; Dmitry Chuyko
> <dmitry.chuyko at bell-sw.com>; aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] Some benchmarking help required
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Dmitry and I arm-wrestled for it and and I lost. ��
> I'll work on the SPECjbb numbers. May take a day or so to get numbers out.
> 
>  - Derek
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aarch64-port-dev [mailto:aarch64-port-dev-
> > bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Haley
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:01 AM
> > To: Dmitry Chuyko <dmitry.chuyko at bell-sw.com>; aarch64-port-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: [aarch64-port-dev ] Some benchmarking help required
> >
> > Thank you, you've been wonderful.  Can I be a pain and ask for one
> > more thing, SPECjbb?  Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Haley
> > Java Platform Lead Engineer
> > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671


More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list