[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: Bulk integration shenandoah/jdk8u -> aarch64-port/jdk8u-shenandoah 2018-09-17

[Andrew Hughes]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 12:30, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/17/2018 12:58 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > This integrates changes from shenandoah/jdk8u into
> > aarch64-port/jdk8u-shenandoah repository, reaching back to May 2018.
> > It's bugfixes, improvements and new features that have been originally
> > done in Shenandoah dev repo, and then backported to Shenandoah JDK8u
> > repo and tested there for a while too.
>
> Also, our adopters are running sh/jdk8u without problems for a while now. Time
> to put this into RPMs.
>
> > List of changes:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/jdk8u-shenandoah-integration-2018-09-17/jdk8u-shenandoah-integration-2018-09-17.txt
>
> Oh, so much good stuff is missing in current aarch64-port/jdk8u-shenandoah!
>
> > Webrev showing only shared-changes:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/jdk8u-shenandoah-integration-2018-09-17/webrev.00.shared/
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> > Full webrev:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/jdk8u-shenandoah-integration-2018-09-17/webrev.00/
>
> Shenandoah integration parts look good for me too.
>
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey
>

The changes look ok to me too. Is there a reason to maintain both
shenandoah/jdk8u
and aarch64-port/shenandoah-jdk8u, now that Shenandoah development has moved
to an OpenJDK 12 base?
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222