[aarch64-port-dev ] Tracking aarch64 downstream backports

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Fri Apr 26 14:44:54 UTC 2019


On 4/25/19 1:16 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> This bug is low priority, near-zero impact. If anyone wants to request
>> an 8u backport I'll reply with jdk8u-fix-no, which will solve that
>> problem.
> Sure, you can do that. And then the report would say "REJECTED", and it would be out of the list.
> Importantly, it would be explicitly rejected by maintainers, rather than being ambiguously in
> "MISSING" limbo. What concerns me that we can have bugs that you want in aarch64-port, but don't
> know it is missing (until you discover that, much to your surprise when dealing with
> customer-reported bug :]). This is what backports monitor is for.

OK, got that. Thanks.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671



More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list