[aarch64-port-dev ] Tracking aarch64 downstream backports

[Andrew Haley]

On 4/30/19 10:14 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> ...I think the important part here is "aarch64", not "shenandoah". So, maybe the version tag should
> be "8-aarch64". And, given there is only a single active tree in aarch64, it would be unambiguous.
> It would be awkward to mark AArch64-specific bugs with 8-shenandoah, when those issues are not
> related to Shenandoah at all, but rather relate to 8u aarch64 port.

Well, yes, OK. So there will be 8u-aarch64 and 8u-shenandoah versions,
destined for the same tree. A merge is looking more and more attractive.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671