[aarch64-port-dev ] [NEW BUG]Missing LoadStore barrier in interpreter?
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Sun Feb 3 18:26:24 UTC 2019
On 2/3/19 2:55 AM, Patrick Zhang wrote:
> Could you please explain this a little bit more? It looks aarch64 has a StoreLoad there, while x86 has StoreLoad|StoreStore, did you mean the StoreStore can be dropped by aarch64 because x86 TSO needs more protection here?
Oh, I see what you're asking. StoreLoad|StoreStore generates the same
code as StoreLoad on both Intel and AArch64, so it does not matter. I
guess it should be changed in order not to confuse people.
--
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list