[aarch64-port-dev ] JTREG, JCStress, SPECjbb2015 and Hadoop/Terasort results for OpenJDK JDK on AArch64
Nick Gasson (Arm Technology China)
Nick.Gasson at arm.com
Fri Jan 4 02:43:57 UTC 2019
Hi Stuart and Fathi,
> Build 14: aarch64/2019/jan/02 pass: 5,554; fail: 21; error: 1; not
run: 93
> Build 14: aarch64/2019/jan/02 pass: 8,574; fail: 689; error: 24
A lot of the failures here are known problems with the tests listed in
test/jdk/ProblemList.txt and test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt. I think
if we exclude these with the jtreg -exclude option it will be much
easier to spot genuine failures and regressions.
Thanks,
Nick
On 03/01/2019 09:38, ci_notify at linaro.org wrote:
> This is a summary of the JTREG test results
> ===========================================
>
> The build and test results are cycled every 15 days.
>
> For detailed information on the test output please refer to:
>
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/summary/2019/002/summary.html
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> client-release/hotspot
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 5,780; fail: 19; not run: 90
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> client-release/jdk
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 8,495; fail: 670; error: 23
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> client-release/langtools
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 3,970; fail: 5
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> release/hotspot
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/nov/28 pass: 5,430; fail: 66; not run: 90
> Build 1: aarch64/2018/nov/30 pass: 5,431; fail: 65; not run: 91
> Build 2: aarch64/2018/dec/03 pass: 5,432; fail: 66; not run: 91
> Build 3: aarch64/2018/dec/05 pass: 5,435; fail: 65; not run: 91
> Build 4: aarch64/2018/dec/07 pass: 5,429; fail: 65; not run: 93
> Build 5: aarch64/2018/dec/10 pass: 5,475; fail: 19; not run: 93
> Build 6: aarch64/2018/dec/12 pass: 5,546; fail: 23; error: 2; not run: 93
> Build 7: aarch64/2018/dec/17 pass: 5,550; fail: 22; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 8: aarch64/2018/dec/19 pass: 5,550; fail: 22; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 9: aarch64/2018/dec/21 pass: 5,554; fail: 20; error: 2; not run: 93
> Build 10: aarch64/2018/dec/24 pass: 5,553; fail: 22; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 11: aarch64/2018/dec/26 pass: 5,555; fail: 20; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 12: aarch64/2018/dec/28 pass: 5,554; fail: 21; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 13: aarch64/2018/dec/31 pass: 5,556; fail: 19; error: 1; not run: 93
> Build 14: aarch64/2019/jan/02 pass: 5,554; fail: 21; error: 1; not run: 93
>
> 1 fatal errors were detected; please follow the link above for more detail.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> release/jdk
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/nov/28 pass: 8,535; fail: 685; error: 20
> Build 1: aarch64/2018/nov/30 pass: 8,524; fail: 693; error: 28
> Build 2: aarch64/2018/dec/03 pass: 8,525; fail: 696; error: 25
> Build 3: aarch64/2018/dec/05 pass: 8,546; fail: 681; error: 20
> Build 4: aarch64/2018/dec/07 pass: 8,558; fail: 677; error: 29
> Build 5: aarch64/2018/dec/10 pass: 8,552; fail: 694; error: 27
> Build 6: aarch64/2018/dec/12 pass: 8,561; fail: 680; error: 31
> Build 7: aarch64/2018/dec/17 pass: 8,564; fail: 692; error: 22
> Build 8: aarch64/2018/dec/19 pass: 8,505; fail: 742; error: 31
> Build 9: aarch64/2018/dec/21 pass: 8,567; fail: 686; error: 30
> Build 10: aarch64/2018/dec/24 pass: 8,570; fail: 692; error: 25
> Build 11: aarch64/2018/dec/26 pass: 8,592; fail: 665; error: 30
> Build 12: aarch64/2018/dec/28 pass: 8,576; fail: 684; error: 27
> Build 13: aarch64/2018/dec/31 pass: 8,590; fail: 670; error: 27
> Build 14: aarch64/2019/jan/02 pass: 8,574; fail: 689; error: 24
>
> 4 fatal errors were detected; please follow the link above for more detail.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> release/langtools
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/nov/28 pass: 3,987; fail: 4
> Build 1: aarch64/2018/nov/30 pass: 3,989; fail: 4
> Build 2: aarch64/2018/dec/03 pass: 3,989; fail: 4
> Build 3: aarch64/2018/dec/05 pass: 3,994; fail: 4
> Build 4: aarch64/2018/dec/07 pass: 3,995; fail: 4
> Build 5: aarch64/2018/dec/10 pass: 3,995; fail: 4
> Build 6: aarch64/2018/dec/12 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 7: aarch64/2018/dec/17 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 8: aarch64/2018/dec/19 pass: 3,997; fail: 4
> Build 9: aarch64/2018/dec/21 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 10: aarch64/2018/dec/24 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 11: aarch64/2018/dec/26 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 12: aarch64/2018/dec/28 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 13: aarch64/2018/dec/31 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
> Build 14: aarch64/2019/jan/02 pass: 3,996; fail: 4
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> server-release/hotspot
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 5,787; fail: 18; not run: 90
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> server-release/jdk
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 8,476; fail: 686; error: 27
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> server-release/langtools
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build 0: aarch64/2018/oct/15 pass: 3,970; fail: 5
>
> Previous results can be found here:
>
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/openjdk-jtreg-nightly-tests/index.html
>
>
> SPECjbb2015 composite regression test completed
> ===============================================
>
> This test measures the relative performance of the server
> compiler running the SPECjbb2015 composite tests and compares
> the performance against the baseline performance of the server
> compiler taken on 2016-11-21.
>
> In accordance with [1], the SPECjbb2015 tests are run on a system
> which is not production ready and does not meet all the
> requirements for publishing compliant results. The numbers below
> shall be treated as non-compliant (nc) and are for experimental
> purposes only.
>
> Relative performance: Server max-jOPS (nc): 7.46x
> Relative performance: Server critical-jOPS (nc): 8.09x
>
> Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here:
>
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/SPECjbb2015-results/
>
> [1] http://www.spec.org/fairuse.html#Academic
>
> Regression test Hadoop-Terasort completed
> =========================================
>
> This test measures the performance of the server and client compilers
> running Hadoop sorting a 1GB file using Terasort and compares
> the performance against the baseline performance of the Zero interpreter
> and against the baseline performance of the server compiler
> on 2014-04-01.
>
> Relative performance: Zero: 1.0, Server: 204.57
>
> Server 204.57 / Server 2014-04-01 (71.00): 2.88x
>
> Details of the test setup and historical results may be found here:
>
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/hadoop-terasort-benchmark-results/
>
> This is a summary of the jcstress test results
> ==============================================
>
> The build and test results are cycled every 15 days.
>
> 2018-11-29 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/332/results/
> 2018-12-01 pass rate: 11559/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/334/results/
> 2018-12-04 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/337/results/
> 2018-12-06 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/339/results/
> 2018-12-08 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/341/results/
> 2018-12-11 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/344/results/
> 2018-12-13 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/346/results/
> 2018-12-18 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/351/results/
> 2018-12-20 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/353/results/
> 2018-12-22 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/355/results/
> 2018-12-25 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/358/results/
> 2018-12-27 pass rate: 11559/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/360/results/
> 2018-12-29 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/362/results/
> 2019-01-01 pass rate: 11560/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2018/365/results/
> 2019-01-03 pass rate: 11559/11560, results: http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/2019/002/results/
>
> For detailed information on the test output please refer to:
>
> http://openjdk.linaro.org/jdkX/jcstress-nightly-runs/
>
More information about the aarch64-port-dev
mailing list