[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR: RFR: Bulk integration shenandoah/jdk8u -> aarch64-port/jdk8u-shenandoah 2018-12-13

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 05:35:47 UTC 2019


On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 21:13, Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> wrote:
>

snip...

>
> I don't think that the fix is needed in 11 or 8u upstream, because
> JDK-8212603 isn't there?
>
> Can I push the Shenandoah integration?
>
> Roman
>
>
>
>

I get that, but it's not what I'm asking.

My question is: would it be harmful to push 8212603 to upstream 8u/11u to reduce
our divergence from upstream?

I would prefer that, if possible, to only carrying the fix in the
shenandoah tree.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list