[aarch64-port-dev ] RFR (S) 8228593: Revert explicit JDK 7 support additions

Andrew John Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri Jul 26 12:43:22 UTC 2019



On 26/07/2019 09:26, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> On 25/07/2019 18:52, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 7/25/19 2:25 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2019 21:06, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>> Webrev:
>>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8228593/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> Testing: x86_64 builds, hotspot_gc_shenandoah (no, really, one of these days we would have tier1)
>>> The webrev looks good.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> (n.b. that diff against upstream jvm.cpp includes an unrelated
>>> difference -- I assume that is unrelated to this change)
>>
>> Can you be more specific? There are Shenandoah-related changes -- they are expected there:
>>   https://builds.shipilev.net/patch-openjdk-jdk8-aarch64/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvm.cpp.sdiff.html
> Ah ok, no problem then. I just was not sure why they were in the diff.
> 
> regards,
> 
> 
> Andrew Dinn
> -----------
> Senior Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd
> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander
> 

I was wondering the other day whether the SIM still worked, when
backporting some changes to the AArch64 port on 7.

These are the kind of unnecessary changes I'd like to see rooted out
before it goes into 8u, so happy with both these changes.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew



More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list