[aarch64-port-dev ] JDK 13 AArch64 issues to backport

Aleksey Shipilev shade at redhat.com
Thu Jun 20 08:49:28 UTC 2019


On 6/20/19 9:53 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
>>>>   8218185: aarch64: missing LoadStore barrier in TemplateTable::putfield_or_static
>>>>   8219635: aarch64: missing LoadStore barrier in TemplateTable::fast_storefield
>>>>   8221220: AArch64: Add StoreStore membar explicitly for Volatile Writes in TemplateTable
>>
>> It is a bit awkward that they are backported to 8u, but not to 11u, so maybe just the consistency
>> reasons make them good candidates for 11u backports? Do we think these three are not affecting
>> correctness at all? They don't seem to be harmful for performance, as they affect the interpreter only.
>
> These do not affect correctness nor performance. They were merely
> included to dot is and cross ts. If someone wants to spend time
> backporting them I have no concern but it would be a no-op.

Okay! I backported them, passed tier1, and put jdk11u-fix-requests.

-Aleksey



More information about the aarch64-port-dev mailing list