[aarch64-port-dev ] JDK-8253947: JEP 388 Windows/AArch64 backport to jdk11u

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi Reka,

thanks, please go ahead with opening a PR to jdk11u-dev, containing all the individual commits.

Best regards
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reka Kovacs <rekakovacs at microsoft.com>
> Sent: Dienstag, 29. Juni 2021 02:17
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>
> Cc: aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; Vladimir Kempik <vkempik at azul.com>; Brian
> Stafford <Brian.Stafford at microsoft.com>; aph <aph at redhat.com>;
> Bernhard Urban-Forster <beurba at microsoft.com>; Anton Kozlov
> <akozlov at azul.com>; Monica Beckwith <Monica.Beckwith at microsoft.com>;
> openjdk-aarch64 <openjdk-aarch64 at microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: JDK-8253947: JEP 388 Windows/AArch64 backport to jdk11u
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I will be substituting for Bernhard while he's on leave. Internally, we have the
> PR on top of 11.0.12+5, but will be rebasing it to jdk11u-dev/e62d6a2f3 this
> week. We are still going through our internal review and testing cycles to
> make sure we don't break any other platforms, running jtreg:all on all
> available architecture/OS combinations before and after the backport, and
> SPEC benchmarks similar to the original port testing.
> 
> As for the method of integration, I don't mind opening separate PRs if that
> makes reviews easier. Otherwise, thanks for looking into the merge option.
> 
> Best regards,
> Reka
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> Behalf Of Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 00:01
> To: aph <aph at redhat.com>; Brian Stafford
> <Brian.Stafford at microsoft.com>; Vladimir Kempik <vkempik at azul.com>
> Cc: aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; Bernhard Urban-Forster <beurba at microsoft.com>;
> Anton Kozlov <akozlov at azul.com>; Monica Beckwith
> <Monica.Beckwith at microsoft.com>; openjdk-aarch64 <openjdk-
> aarch64 at microsoft.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: JDK-8253947: JEP 388 Windows/AArch64 backport to
> jdk11u
> 
> Hi,
> 
> now jdk11u-dev has switched to Github for the 11.0.13 CPU release. So it
> would be time to rebase the changes and open a PR here:
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> ub.com%2Fopenjdk%2Fjdk11u-
> dev&data=04%7C01%7Crekakovacs%40microsoft.com%7C8b4645b9143
> 34f1159a608d92726c490%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%
> 7C637583869744063373%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sda
> ta=FMCQkTYN2KLwKXXE8M2slc2P%2FYrN42qPmH%2BDZ%2BxOTOM%3D&a
> mp;reserved=0
> 
> Once this PR has been reviewed and it's agreed that we want to merge the
> changes for JEP 388, we should not integrate it via the usual "/integrate" as
> this would squash all the single commits. I would then rather try to get it in
> via a "merge" PR - which I should be able to do as a maintainer of the Github
> repository. So, please let me know when the PR is ready and I'll have a look
> at the proper way to merge this.
> 
> Alternatively, we can go for each single backport but I guess it would be
> cumbersome in this case... ��
> 
> Best regards
> Christoph
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Andrew Haley
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2021 10:34
> > To: Brian Stafford <Brian.Stafford at microsoft.com>
> > Cc: aarch64-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: JDK-8253947: JEP 388 Windows/AArch64 backport to jdk11u
> >
> > On 6/3/21 1:11 AM, Brian Stafford wrote:
> > > If we can get confirmation from Andrew Haley on that, we'll go ahead
> > > with
> > preparing the PR against jdk11u-dev shortly (Bernhard is away on
> > paternity leave, so it will be created by someone else from our team).
> >
> > Let's see what the patch looks like and wed can take it from there. I
> > hope that we can do this in a way that is not risky to anything else.
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Haley  (he/him)
> > Java Platform Lead Engineer
> > Red Hat UK Ltd.
> >
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw
> ww
> >
> .redhat.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Crekakovacs%40microsoft.com%7C8
> b4645b
> >
> 914334f1159a608d92726c490%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%
> 7C0%7
> >
> C637583869744063373%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIj
> >
> oiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=lTpD5pk
> J6L20
> > t%2Bx56rlY%2FLNJtAUVL52wkVve1unjjsI%3D&reserved=0>
> >
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkey
> b
> >
> ase.io%2Fandrewhaley&data=04%7C01%7Crekakovacs%40microsoft.co
> m%7C8
> >
> b4645b914334f1159a608d92726c490%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47
> %7C1
> >
> %7C0%7C637583869744063373%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
> 4wLjAwMDAi
> >
> LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=r3
> zlyg
> > 1VkvS4uN225aEuW61Y1m9AERsc8GlJOlU2jkw%3D&reserved=0
> > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671