From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Tue Apr 1 10:03:41 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:03:41 +0100 Subject: JDK 7u60 ea b12 test results are now available Message-ID: <533A8EFD.4010302@oracle.com> JDK 7u60 ea b12 update release test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/7/testresults.html The test results contain no new failure compared to b11 test results. Thanks Balchandra From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Tue Apr 1 15:30:12 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:30:12 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Hi Ivan, Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. Rgds, Rory On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last year > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with initial > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting and > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we set > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along with a > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab on > the well known Lambda tutorial. > > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or lambdas > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this week > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on that I > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going to > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. > > So, I have the following questions: > > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would you > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on in > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases for > them > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue > > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in > the last few months! > > Cheers, > Ivan -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 15:45:25 2014 From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:45:25 +0300 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Rory, Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any tangible value to the project. Cheers, Ivan On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here > > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. > > Rgds, Rory > > > > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last year > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with initial > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting and > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we set > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along with a > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab on > the well known Lambda tutorial. > > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or lambdas > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this week > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on that I > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going to > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. > > So, I have the following questions: > > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would you > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on in > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases for > them > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue > > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in > the last few months! > > Cheers, > Ivan > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 15:51:09 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:51:09 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Ivan, Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location? Unfortunately Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw HTML as opposed to the output displayed. I/we should then be able to give some advice on the suitability. On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue. Cheers, Martijn On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > Hi Rory, > > Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is > whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be > accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any > tangible value to the project. > > Cheers, > Ivan > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < > rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here< > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor> > > > > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. > > > > Rgds, Rory > > > > > > > > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last year > > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with > initial > > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting > and > > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we > set > > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I > > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for > > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along > with a > > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab on > > the well known Lambda tutorial. > > > > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to > > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or > lambdas > > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this > week > > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's > > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on > that I > > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going to > > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. > > > > So, I have the following questions: > > > > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would > you > > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on > in > > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases for > > them > > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we > > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue > > > > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in > > the last few months! > > > > Cheers, > > Ivan > > > > > > -- > > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > > Quality Engineering Manager > > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > > > > From ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 18:41:38 2014 From: ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com (Ivan St. Ivanov) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:41:38 +0300 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hey Martijn, Here it is: http://www. dmitryalexandrov.net/webrev/ Thanks, Ivan On Apr 1, 2014 6:51 PM, "Martijn Verburg" wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location? Unfortunately > Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw HTML > as opposed to the output displayed. I/we should then be able to give some > advice on the suitability. > > On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > >> Hi Rory, >> >> Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is >> whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be >> accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any >> tangible value to the project. >> >> Cheers, >> Ivan >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < >> rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Ivan, >> > >> > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here< >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor> >> > >> > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. >> > >> > Rgds, Rory >> > >> > >> > >> > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last >> year >> > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with >> initial >> > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting >> and >> > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we >> set >> > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I >> > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for >> > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along >> with a >> > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab >> on >> > the well known Lambda tutorial. >> > >> > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to >> > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or >> lambdas >> > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this >> week >> > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's >> > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on >> that I >> > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going >> to >> > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. >> > >> > So, I have the following questions: >> > >> > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would >> you >> > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on >> in >> > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases >> for >> > them >> > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we >> > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue >> > >> > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in >> > the last few months! >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Ivan >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >> > Quality Engineering Manager >> > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> > >> > >> > > From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 19:32:00 2014 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:32:00 +0200 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hello Ivan, I think it would make sense to split the patch in two, since even if the class is the same, they are really two separate "issues". I think the switch part of your changeset is not really necessary, since the style would be corrected by adding just the missing parenthesis. If you still want to use the switch, then please add a break after "default" and keep the label on their own lines and align the break 4 at spaces (I think this is the recommended style, I may be wrong though). Cheers, and welcome :) Mario Il 01/apr/2014 20:42 "Ivan St. Ivanov" ha scritto: > Hey Martijn, > > Here it is: http://www. > dmitryalexandrov.net/webrev/ > > Thanks, > Ivan > On Apr 1, 2014 6:51 PM, "Martijn Verburg" > wrote: > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location? Unfortunately > > Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw > HTML > > as opposed to the output displayed. I/we should then be able to give > some > > advice on the suitability. > > > > On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue. > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > > On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > > > >> Hi Rory, > >> > >> Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is > >> whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be > >> accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any > >> tangible value to the project. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ivan > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < > >> rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Ivan, > >> > > >> > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page > here< > >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor> > >> > > >> > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. > >> > > >> > Rgds, Rory > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi folks, > >> > > >> > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last > >> year > >> > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with > >> initial > >> > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG > meeting > >> and > >> > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then > we > >> set > >> > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact > I > >> > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for > >> > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along > >> with a > >> > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab > >> on > >> > the well known Lambda tutorial. > >> > > >> > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing > to > >> > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or > >> lambdas > >> > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this > >> week > >> > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run > IntelliJ's > >> > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on > >> that I > >> > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going > >> to > >> > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. > >> > > >> > So, I have the following questions: > >> > > >> > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, > would > >> you > >> > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go > on > >> in > >> > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases > >> for > >> > them > >> > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we > >> > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue > >> > > >> > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG > in > >> > the last few months! > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Ivan > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > >> > Quality Engineering Manager > >> > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > From sadhak001 at gmail.com Tue Apr 1 21:27:20 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 22:27:20 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: +1 These are good guidelines, its always good to split commits into smaller units. Looking forward to some interesting contributions from all. Cheers, Mani On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > Hello Ivan, > > I think it would make sense to split the patch in two, since even if the > class is the same, they are really two separate "issues". > > I think the switch part of your changeset is not really necessary, since > the style would be corrected by adding just the missing parenthesis. If you > still want to use the switch, then please add a break after "default" and > keep the label on their own lines and align the break 4 at spaces (I think > this is the recommended style, I may be wrong though). > > Cheers, and welcome :) > Mario > Il 01/apr/2014 20:42 "Ivan St. Ivanov" ha > scritto: > > > Hey Martijn, > > > > Here it is: http://www. > > dmitryalexandrov.net/webrev/ > > > > Thanks, > > Ivan > > On Apr 1, 2014 6:51 PM, "Martijn Verburg" > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > > > Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location? Unfortunately > > > Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw > > HTML > > > as opposed to the output displayed. I/we should then be able to give > > some > > > advice on the suitability. > > > > > > On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Rory, > > >> > > >> Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is > > >> whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be > > >> accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any > > >> tangible value to the project. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Ivan > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland > < > > >> rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Ivan, > > >> > > > >> > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page > > here< > > >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor> > > >> > > > >> > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. > > >> > > > >> > Rgds, Rory > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi folks, > > >> > > > >> > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last > > >> year > > >> > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with > > >> initial > > >> > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG > > meeting > > >> and > > >> > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then > > we > > >> set > > >> > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In > fact > > I > > >> > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for > > >> > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along > > >> with a > > >> > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on > lab > > >> on > > >> > the well known Lambda tutorial. > > >> > > > >> > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good > thing > > to > > >> > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or > > >> lambdas > > >> > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier > this > > >> week > > >> > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run > > IntelliJ's > > >> > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on > > >> that I > > >> > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before > going > > >> to > > >> > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: > > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. > > >> > > > >> > So, I have the following questions: > > >> > > > >> > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, > > would > > >> you > > >> > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go > > on > > >> in > > >> > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test > cases > > >> for > > >> > them > > >> > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that > we > > >> > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue > > >> > > > >> > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our > JUG > > in > > >> > the last few months! > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Ivan > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > > >> > Quality Engineering Manager > > >> > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 06:46:17 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:46:17 +0100 Subject: Fwd: HEADSUP: Potential get_source.sh issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Mike Duigou* Date: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 Subject: HEADSUP: Potential get_source.sh issue To: jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net Hello all; If you are using get_source.sh to *update* local repositories be on the lookout for messages like: (run 'hg update' to get a working copy) in the output. If you see this message you need to run: sh common/bin/hgforest.sh update to update your local repo to the head. A bug in hgforest.sh last week prevented automatic updates (the "-u" was omitted from the pull command) and if you have the buggy hgforest.sh as your local copy then your local copy won't itself be updated by the fix in JDK-8038435. Sorry for the inconvenience, Mike -- Cheers, Martijn From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Apr 2 12:30:26 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:30:26 +0200 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2 In-Reply-To: References: <533ADB84.1030105@oracle.com> Message-ID: <161AAA40-8EBF-41B4-9114-46622CAE99A7@oracle.com> In general, trying to do multiple different unrelated things in a single change is a bad idea. Not just because it introduces artificial complexity into a simple operation, as it requires reviewers to chip in on two distinct issues. It also means that a change is more likely to get stalled out during the review phase, as with every new separate concern to review the chance of having to spend another review round only goes up, bringing us back to the artificial complexity during review. More specifically in a case like this, where you are trying to lift parts of the class library to use a new feature, it is rarely done on a class by class basis, unless the complexity and risk of change would warrant it (and if that was the case, it'd be a bad item to start learning the ropes on). Otherwise, you'd have dozens if not hundreds of spurious change sets for 'applied new feature x to class y' with the corresponding bad human effort to benefit ratio. A good example to follow is being set by Joe Darcy and his Javac lint warnings eradication quest - see core-libs-dev archives for details. So, in short - pick one thing you want to do, like strings in switch, get some idea how much work that is going to be and make a plan how you are going to do it and how long it's going to take, and then post to say core-libs-dev about your idea before you post a patch. The reason for starting a conversation at the ideas stage rather than at the 'here's my patch, someone please pull this in please' is quite simple - as with many things in life, timing is everything, and there may be other cleanups or integration efforts going on without one necessarily being aware of it at the time of patch submission. Cheers, Dalibor -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 01.04.2014, at 20:41, "Ivan St. Ivanov" wrote: > > Hey Martijn, > > Here it is: http://www. > dmitryalexandrov.net/webrev/ > > Thanks, > Ivan >> On Apr 1, 2014 6:51 PM, "Martijn Verburg" wrote: >> >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location? Unfortunately >> Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw HTML >> as opposed to the output displayed. I/we should then be able to give some >> advice on the suitability. >> >> On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >>> On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rory, >>> >>> Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is >>> whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be >>> accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any >>> tangible value to the project. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < >>> rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ivan, >>>> >>>> Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here< >>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor> >>>> >>>> It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved. >>>> >>>> Rgds, Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last >>> year >>>> our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with >>> initial >>>> presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting >>> and >>>> two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we >>> set >>>> up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I >>>> think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for >>>> download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along >>> with a >>>> presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab >>> on >>>> the well known Lambda tutorial. >>>> >>>> Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to >>>> start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or >>> lambdas >>>> to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this >>> week >>>> I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's >>>> code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on >>> that I >>>> created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going >>> to >>>> the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created: >>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM. >>>> >>>> So, I have the following questions: >>>> >>>> - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would >>> you >>>> recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on >>> in >>>> our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases >>> for >>>> them >>>> - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we >>>> find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue >>>> >>>> Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in >>>> the last few months! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>>> Quality Engineering Manager >>>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> >> From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 21:37:58 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 22:37:58 +0100 Subject: This week's #adoptopenjdk newsletter! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=9ca32850-baa7-11e3-bba6-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 08:32:56 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:32:56 +0100 Subject: Fwd: hg.openjdk.java.net project and per-project repository lists In-Reply-To: <20140402120133.478052@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20140402120133.478052@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Hi all, These listings help clarify what OpenJDK is made up of in terms of projects and code repositories! I've updated the New Contributor guide ( https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor) and the full build instructions guide on adoptopenjdk.java.net with this extra information. Cheers, Martijn ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: 2 April 2014 20:01 Subject: hg.openjdk.java.net project and per-project repository lists To: announce at openjdk.java.net http://hg.openjdk.java.net now displays a list of Projects rather than every single repository on the server (or, more annoyingly, a "503 Service Unavailable" error). http://hg.openjdk.java.net/$PROJECT now displays a list of all the repositories for $PROJECT; e.g., http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9 . The non-root repositories of Mercurial forests are indented so as to make the overall list easier to read. Please report any problems to ops at openjdk dot java dot net. - Mark From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 19:36:46 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:36:46 +0100 Subject: hg.openjdk.java.net project and per-project repository lists In-Reply-To: References: <20140402120133.478052@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Hi Martijn, When you get a chance would you mind having a looking at these docs to see if they have the goodies you have added the wiki (feel free to leave any comments and I'll make adjustments): Adopt OpenJDK Getting Started Kit: http://bit.ly/17ovGUB Adopt OpenJDK intermediate & Advance experiences: http://bit.ly/1ckphOl They come very handy at conferences and hackdays (so far have proven valuable) - eventually they should find their way into a wiki system. Cheers, Mani On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi all, > > These listings help clarify what OpenJDK is made up of in terms of > projects and code repositories! I've updated the New Contributor guide ( > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor) and the > full build instructions guide on adoptopenjdk.java.net with this extra > information. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > Date: 2 April 2014 20:01 > Subject: hg.openjdk.java.net project and per-project repository lists > To: announce at openjdk.java.net > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net now displays a list of Projects rather > than every single repository on the server (or, more annoyingly, > a "503 Service Unavailable" error). > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/$PROJECT now displays a list of all the > repositories for $PROJECT; e.g., http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9 . > > The non-root repositories of Mercurial forests are indented so as > to make the overall list easier to read. > > Please report any problems to ops at openjdk dot java dot net. > > - Mark > > -- > -- You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups Adopt OpenJDK group. To post to this group, send an email to > adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, > visit this group at > https://groups.google.com/d/forum/adopt-openjdk?hl=en-GB > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Adopt OpenJDK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adopt-openjdk. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Fri Apr 4 10:08:08 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:08:08 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? Message-ID: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Hi all, Following on from Mani's earlier email, we've had a lot of success with the 'Getting Started' docs at recent events in London, Bulgaria and Germany (and kudos to Mani here, for investing some serious time!) I'm thinking they have reached critical mass now, both in terms of content, and also provable acceptance. Therefore, would it be a good idea to try and incorporate the contents into the OpenJDK wiki? I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? Best wishes, Daniel -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From martijnverburg at gmail.com Fri Apr 4 11:03:39 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:03:39 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi Daniel, +1 from me, I also want to move over relevant material from adoptopenjdk.java.net. We just have to carefully decide what the material is suitable for here and what should stay over there. Perhaps we decide on a per Adopt OpenJDK 'project' basis? I think anything todo with getting people up and running with OpenJDK development is fair game but we shouldn't duplicate existing OpenJDK documentation (which in recent months has caught up). Cheers, Martijn On 4 April 2014 11:08, Daniel Bryant wrote: > Hi all, > > Following on from Mani's earlier email, we've had a lot of success with > the 'Getting Started' docs at recent events in London, Bulgaria and Germany > (and kudos to Mani here, for investing some serious time!) > > I'm thinking they have reached critical mass now, both in terms of > content, and also provable acceptance. Therefore, would it be a good idea > to try and incorporate the contents into the OpenJDK wiki? > > I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would > increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the > wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? > > Best wishes, > > Daniel > > > -- > *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < > http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 > (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > From benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com Fri Apr 4 11:05:11 2014 From: benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com (Ben Evans) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:05:11 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: +1 Google infrastructure (eg Drive & mailing lists) is not accessible at many corporates. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > +1 from me, I also want to move over relevant material from > adoptopenjdk.java.net. We just have to carefully decide what the material > is suitable for here and what should stay over there. Perhaps we decide on > a per Adopt OpenJDK 'project' basis? I think anything todo with getting > people up and running with OpenJDK development is fair game but we shouldn't > duplicate existing OpenJDK documentation (which in recent months has caught > up). > > > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 4 April 2014 11:08, Daniel Bryant wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Following on from Mani's earlier email, we've had a lot of success with >> the 'Getting Started' docs at recent events in London, Bulgaria and Germany >> (and kudos to Mani here, for investing some serious time!) >> >> I'm thinking they have reached critical mass now, both in terms of >> content, and also provable acceptance. Therefore, would it be a good idea to >> try and incorporate the contents into the OpenJDK wiki? >> >> I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would >> increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the >> wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Daniel >> >> >> -- >> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk >> * >> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > > > -- > -- You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups Adopt OpenJDK group. To post to this group, send an email to > adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit > this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/adopt-openjdk?hl=en-GB > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Adopt OpenJDK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adopt-openjdk. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Apr 4 12:10:32 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:10:32 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: <533EA138.9000202@oracle.com> + 1 for one stop shop. Rgds,Rory On 04/04/2014 12:05, Ben Evans wrote: > +1 > > Google infrastructure (eg Drive & mailing lists) is not accessible at > many corporates. > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Martijn Verburg > wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> +1 from me, I also want to move over relevant material from >> adoptopenjdk.java.net. We just have to carefully decide what the material >> is suitable for here and what should stay over there. Perhaps we decide on >> a per Adopt OpenJDK 'project' basis? I think anything todo with getting >> people up and running with OpenJDK development is fair game but we shouldn't >> duplicate existing OpenJDK documentation (which in recent months has caught >> up). >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> On 4 April 2014 11:08, Daniel Bryant wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following on from Mani's earlier email, we've had a lot of success with >>> the 'Getting Started' docs at recent events in London, Bulgaria and Germany >>> (and kudos to Mani here, for investing some serious time!) >>> >>> I'm thinking they have reached critical mass now, both in terms of >>> content, and also provable acceptance. Therefore, would it be a good idea to >>> try and incorporate the contents into the OpenJDK wiki? >>> >>> I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would >>> increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the >>> wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk >>> * >>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk >> >> -- >> -- You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups Adopt OpenJDK group. To post to this group, send an email to >> adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send an >> email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit >> this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/adopt-openjdk?hl=en-GB >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Adopt OpenJDK" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adopt-openjdk. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From sadhak001 at gmail.com Fri Apr 4 22:17:04 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 23:17:04 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: <533EA138.9000202@oracle.com> References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> <533EA138.9000202@oracle.com> Message-ID: +1 for everyone's +1! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > + 1 for one stop shop. > > Rgds,Rory > > On 04/04/2014 12:05, Ben Evans wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Google infrastructure (eg Drive & mailing lists) is not accessible at >> many corporates. >> >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Martijn Verburg >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> +1 from me, I also want to move over relevant material from >>> adoptopenjdk.java.net. We just have to carefully decide what the >>> material >>> is suitable for here and what should stay over there. Perhaps we decide >>> on >>> a per Adopt OpenJDK 'project' basis? I think anything todo with getting >>> people up and running with OpenJDK development is fair game but we >>> shouldn't >>> duplicate existing OpenJDK documentation (which in recent months has >>> caught >>> up). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>> On 4 April 2014 11:08, Daniel Bryant >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Following on from Mani's earlier email, we've had a lot of success with >>>> the 'Getting Started' docs at recent events in London, Bulgaria and >>>> Germany >>>> (and kudos to Mani here, for investing some serious time!) >>>> >>>> I'm thinking they have reached critical mass now, both in terms of >>>> content, and also provable acceptance. Therefore, would it be a good >>>> idea to >>>> try and incorporate the contents into the OpenJDK wiki? >>>> >>>> I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it >>>> would >>>> increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making >>>> the >>>> wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk >>>> * >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | >>>> +44 >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk >>> > >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups Adopt OpenJDK group. To post to this group, send an email to >>> adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send an >>> email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, >>> visit >>> this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/adopt-openjdk?hl=en-GB >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Adopt OpenJDK" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to adopt-openjdk+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to adopt-openjdk at googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adopt-openjdk. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From richard.warburton at gmail.com Sat Apr 5 08:48:30 2014 From: richard.warburton at gmail.com (Richard Warburton) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:48:30 -0700 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi, I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would > increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the > wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? > So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there was complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed to figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out how/where the information should lie. regards, Richard Warburton http://insightfullogic.com @RichardWarburto From sadhak001 at gmail.com Sun Apr 6 11:11:03 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:11:03 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: +1 I'm of the same thinking! I was thinking of these steps - remove redundant info (replace them with links to the existing wiki if they are necessary) - refer to the existing wiki for any new editions - combine the two documents into one with both getting started and next steps in one doc - reorganise the contents of resulting document to help create a seamless experience to end-users Cheers, Mani On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Richard Warburton < richard.warburton at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would >> increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making the >> wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? >> > > So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there was > complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed to > figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a > sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good > thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So > its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out > how/where the information should lie. > > regards, > > Richard Warburton > > http://insightfullogic.com > @RichardWarburto > -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 12:49:16 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:49:16 +0100 Subject: Betterrev code and documentation update Message-ID: Hi all, FYI - the Betterrev project has moved to play 2.2.1 (and several other library bumps) - we've also overhauled the documentation and wiki starting at: https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev/overview In particular there is a Grand Plan - https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev/wiki/Test%20and%20CI and Workflow - https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev/wiki/Work%20Flow Section that's good to get an overview of the project. Cheers, Martijn From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Mon Apr 7 12:47:10 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:47:10 +0100 Subject: JDK 7u60 ea b13 test results are now available Message-ID: <53429E4E.4060701@oracle.com> JDK 7u60 ea b13 update release test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/7/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 1 difference. 0: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b12/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,925; fail: 13; not run: 815 1: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b13/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,926; fail: 13; not run: 815 0 1 Test --- pass tools/launcher/I18NArgTest.java 1 differences The hotspot and langtools test results are identical to b12 test results. Thanks Balchandra From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 13:20:18 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:20:18 +0100 Subject: Mission Statement for the Adoption Group for OpenJDK In-Reply-To: References: <52F3922E.2060201@tai-dev.co.uk> <52F4AFF7.3000400@tai-dev.co.uk> <52FA6B10.9000103@tai-dev.co.uk> <52FA7631.6000508@tai-dev.co.uk> <53025344.9040906@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi all, I've taken the liberty of using Daniel's modified version of the statement with some extra explanation of sustainability and scalability. We're slowly moving over relevant wiki content from the existing Adopt OpenJDK programme at adoptopenjdk.java.net. I'll be asking that community to relabel itself as a general "Adopt Java" group, which means it can stay as a comfortable home for projects such as Javacountdown.net which aren't OpenJDK specific. There will be lots of construction work on both sides of the fence for a few weeks. All comments/questions/feedback of course very welcome. Cheers, Martijn On 18 February 2014 06:17, Steve Poole wrote: > Happy to see it go Daniel :-) > > > > > > From: Daniel Bryant > To: adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net > Date: 17/02/2014 18:22 > Subject: Re: Mission Statement for the Adoption Group for OpenJDK > Sent by: adoption-discuss-bounces at openjdk.java.net > > > > Hi all, > > Just bumping this thread so that Cecila can respond in context :-) > > The current proposal is below (and I'm wondering whether the word > 'premier' is appropriate here, as per my latest email?) > > Best wishes, > > Daniel > > > On 16/02/2014 07:10, Steve Poole wrote: > > I rather like 'champion' [1] for the same reasons that it used > > within 'Java Champions' :-) . However we could take a slightly > > longer version of 'actively support' to give > > > > *"Actively promote and support community involvement in the > > development, adoption and evangelism of premier OpenJDK projects"* > > > > [1] a person who actively supports or favors a cause > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Ben Evans > > To: Daniel Bryant > > Cc: adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net > > Date: 14/02/2014 13:48 > > Subject: Re: Mission Statement for the Adoption Group for OpenJDK > > Sent by: adoption-discuss-bounces at openjdk.java.net > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > I wouldn't use the word "Champion" as it may invite confusion with the > > Java > > Champions programme, especially for non-EFL developers. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Bryant > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Martijn, Mani (and all), > > > > > > Thanks Martijn, and I definitely see the logic behind making the > mission > > > statement punchy. I think Mani hit the nail on the head with this > quote > > > > > > It should answer questions like why am I joining, who is/are > > benefiting, > > >> what and how am I contributing > > >> > > > > > > The mission statement should definitely answer the first part of this > > > statement, and maybe the other two parts are covered in the vision > > > statement? > > > > > > How about this for the mission statement: > > > > > > "Champion increased community involvement in the development, > > adoption and > > > evangelism of OpenJDK projects, with the ultimate goal of increasing > > > contributions in a scalable manner" > > > > > > Does that capture everything, and do we need to go shorter? > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | > www.tai-dev.co.uk< > > > http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > > > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | > +44 > > > (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk < > https://twitter.com/taidevcouk> > > > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > > number 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU > > -- > *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk > * > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 > (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 13:28:24 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:28:24 +0100 Subject: Updated Wiki Main page Message-ID: Hi all, I've overhauled the Main page which hopefully makes what we're about and what we're up to nice and clear. Questions/Comments welcome Cheers, Martijn From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 13:41:33 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:41:33 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <533E8488.3010607@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi all, I'm intending on starting this work once I get approval from the original Adopt OpenJDK group to make the split. Cheers, Martijn On 6 April 2014 12:11, Mani Sarkar wrote: > +1 I'm of the same thinking! > > I was thinking of these steps > - remove redundant info (replace them with links to the existing wiki if > they are necessary) > - refer to the existing wiki for any new editions > - combine the two documents into one with both getting started and next > steps in one doc > - reorganise the contents of resulting document to help create a seamless > experience to end-users > > Cheers, > Mani > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Richard Warburton < > richard.warburton at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would > >> increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making > the > >> wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? > >> > > > > So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there > was > > complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed to > > figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a > > sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good > > thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So > > its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out > > how/where the information should lie. > > > > regards, > > > > Richard Warburton > > > > http://insightfullogic.com > > @RichardWarburto > > > > > > -- > @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog > ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate > (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) > *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector< > https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* > | **Bitbucket * * | **Github > * * | **LinkedIn > * > *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ > > *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come > chasing after you!* > From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 19:39:39 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:39:39 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group Message-ID: Hi all, This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's experience here :-). We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things documented at adoptopenjdk.java.net. I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across concrete material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or even become new ones themselves. Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it all across, especially given that there's a process to make community initiatives part of or into official OpenJDK projects. Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net that folks would object to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would remain there at present. Cheers, Martijn From Sunny.Chan at gs.com Tue Apr 8 05:33:14 2014 From: Sunny.Chan at gs.com (Chan, Sunny) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:33:14 +0800 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? Message-ID: <1CF6FDFD0639DF478B44651D79ECE704A4EA03DF@GSCMHKP12EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com> I am happy to contribute to a quick start guide documentation - for example here is my blog entry on how to compile OpenJDK on Windows (probably need updating!) http://www.sunnychan.hk/roller/sunny/entry/how_to_compile_openjdk_on Perhaps an outline like this: 1) Prerequisite environment 2) Initial setup (e.g. getting the VM, etc) 3) How to compile, what are the options 4) Different type of builds (what is fastdebug? Etc) 5) How to start contributing (What bug to work on, etc) Message: 1 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:48:30 -0700 From: Richard Warburton To: Daniel Bryant Cc: adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would > increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making > the wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? > So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there was complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed to figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out how/where the information should lie. regards, Richard Warburton http://insightfullogic.com @RichardWarburto From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 07:40:57 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:40:57 +0100 Subject: Proposal to update build documentation Message-ID: Hi all, The Adoption Group is about to embark on it's migration of all of its documentation on building OpenJDK (adoptopenjdk.java.net contains a bunch of pages). We found your group page at http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/and wiki at https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Main and figured our documentation should really fall under your gropup's banner (we can reference it from the Adoption Group for new comers). So our proposal is to: 1.) Compare the docs that we have vs what's contained in the various README-builds.html files 2.) Send in patches to README-builds.html where appropriate 3.) Only document temporary workarounds / known issues etc in the Build group's wiki And the one I was more uncertain about: * Document uncommon build scenarios Build group's wiki, e.g. What certain unusual flags mean and so forth. Does this sound reasonable? I'm happy to walk through the existing documentation set that we have with someone so you have a clear idea on what we're proposing to bring across. Cheers, Martijn From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 07:41:12 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:41:12 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: <1CF6FDFD0639DF478B44651D79ECE704A4EA03DF@GSCMHKP12EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com> References: <1CF6FDFD0639DF478B44651D79ECE704A4EA03DF@GSCMHKP12EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com> Message-ID: Hi Sunny, Thanks! I think the best place to start is to review the existing build documentation that comes with the source of OpenJDK vs what you, Mani and the adoptopenjdk wiki has. I'd like for us to actually improve *that* documentation first and use the wiki to document temporary workarounds and rarer situations (perhaps things like fastdebug builds and so forth). I notice that the build group has a wiki - https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Main and in the spirit of us helping out other groups and projects I suggest we co-ordinate with them and have the vast majority of the build related documentation go there. I've sent them a note. Cheers, Martijn On 8 April 2014 06:33, Chan, Sunny wrote: > I am happy to contribute to a quick start guide documentation - for > example here is my blog entry on how to compile OpenJDK on Windows > (probably need updating!) > > http://www.sunnychan.hk/roller/sunny/entry/how_to_compile_openjdk_on > > Perhaps an outline like this: > > 1) Prerequisite environment > 2) Initial setup (e.g. getting the VM, etc) > 3) How to compile, what are the options > 4) Different type of builds (what is fastdebug? Etc) > 5) How to start contributing (What bug to work on, etc) > > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:48:30 -0700 > From: Richard Warburton > To: Daniel Bryant > Cc: adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? > Message-ID: > < > CAMaYbvLUWY5BR5nwQbXBKC_o_qJ7LdpYhK-TfQRF63AkJxjyHg at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would > > increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making > > the wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? > > > > So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there was > complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed to > figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a > sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good > thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So > its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out > how/where the information should lie. > > regards, > > Richard Warburton > > http://insightfullogic.com > @RichardWarburto > > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Tue Apr 8 08:22:10 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:22:10 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 build 06 is available on java.net Message-ID: <5343B1B2.8080105@oracle.com> Hi All, JDK 9 Build 06 Early Access Build is now available for download & test. Rgds, Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Tue Apr 8 08:50:24 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:50:24 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> Hi Martijn, I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? My 2 cents. Rgds,Rory On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi all, > > This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's experience here > :-). > > We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things documented at > adoptopenjdk.java.net. > > I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across concrete > material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or even become > new ones themselves. > > Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it all across, > especially given that there's a process to make community initiatives part > of or into official OpenJDK projects. > > Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net that folks would object > to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would remain there > at present. > > Cheers, > Martijn -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 08:53:44 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:53:44 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> References: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Rory, *Absolutely* - I think we'll move over section by section, starting with the build docs - I've pinged the build group to let them know we'll be contributing to their docs/wiki. Cheers, Martijn On 8 April 2014 09:50, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland < rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good > opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? > > My 2 cents. > Rgds,Rory > > On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's experience here >> :-). >> >> We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things documented at >> adoptopenjdk.java.net. >> >> I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across concrete >> material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or even become >> new ones themselves. >> >> Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it all across, >> especially given that there's a process to make community initiatives part >> of or into official OpenJDK projects. >> >> Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net that folks would object >> to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would remain there >> at present. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Tue Apr 8 11:42:11 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:42:11 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 Early Access build 6 test results now available. Message-ID: <5343E093.8060907@oracle.com> JDK 9 Early Access b06 test results are now available at: http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk and hotspot test results have some failures which we are investigating. When the next build is available we will resume comparing (diffs) test results. Nashorn test results are available at: http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b06/emailable-report.html Rgds, Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 8 21:22:38 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:22:38 +0200 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: References: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5344689E.9070106@oracle.com> I would go at it one by one - ask for review of a page/section on the list, once everyone is happy, move it over. The thing I'd be cautious about is moving any pages where the editors are not Group Members of the Adoption Group, as editing the pages on the OpenJDK Wiki will require Group membership, and Group membership takes a year, or so. cheers, dalibor topic On 08.04.2014 10:53, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Rory, > > *Absolutely* - I think we'll move over section by section, starting with > the build docs - I've pinged the build group to let them know we'll be > contributing to their docs/wiki. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 8 April 2014 09:50, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland > > wrote: > > Hi Martijn, > > I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good > opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? > > My 2 cents. > Rgds,Rory > > On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's > experience here > :-). > > We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things > documented at > adoptopenjdk.java.net . > > I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across > concrete > material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or > even become > new ones themselves. > > Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it > all across, > especially given that there's a process to make community > initiatives part > of or into official OpenJDK projects. > > Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net > that folks would object > to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would > remain there > at present. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From martijnverburg at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 08:58:19 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:58:19 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Draft proposal: JEP 2.0 In-Reply-To: <20140408135412.415597@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20140408135412.415597@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Hi all, FYI - Mark's proposal for JEP 2.0, please give feedback on the discuss at openjdk.java.net mailing list (which you should all be signed up to). Cheers, Martijn ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: 8 April 2014 21:54 Subject: Draft proposal: JEP 2.0 To: discuss at openjdk.java.net The JEP Process [1] has served us well as a way to document proposed enhancements to the JDK. The process does not, however, say how we decide to target a JEP to a particular JDK Release Project, nor does it help track the work subsequently done on a JEP. We also don't have a documented process by which we can create and maintain the overall schedule of a Release Project. To fill these gaps I've drafted an extension of the JEP Process which covers the planning of Release Projects, the tracking of the work done for their Feature JEPs, and the tracking of work done for other kinds of JEPs that are not associated with specific releases. The current draft of the proposal is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0.html The proposal suggests, among other things, that we create a new "JEP" issue type in the JBS JIRA system so that it's easy to see the status of a particular JEP as well as the overall status of an entire Release Project. This draft has been reviewed by a handful of people so far. My thanks to Mathias Axelsson, Brian Beck, Iris Clark, Joe Darcy, Brian Goetz, Georges Saab, and Dalibor Topic for their feedback. If you have comments or suggestions on this draft, please send them in a public reply to this message by Monday, 21 April 2011. I'd like to put this new process in place shortly thereafter. - Mark [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/ From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Wed Apr 9 10:50:31 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:50:31 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 ea b07 test results now available Message-ID: <534525F7.4020404@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b07 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 16 differences from b06 test results. We are investigating the test failures. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b06/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,696; fail: 12; not run: 937 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b07/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,684; fail: 24; not run: 937 0 1 Test pass fail com/sun/management/HotSpotDiagnosticMXBean/CheckOrigin.java pass fail com/sun/tools/attach/BasicTests.java pass fail com/sun/tools/attach/ProviderTest.java pass fail java/lang/instrument/DaemonThread/TestDaemonThread.java pass fail java/lang/instrument/PremainClass/NoPremainAgentTest.java fail pass java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadUserTime.java fail pass java/net/URLPermission/nstest/lookup.sh pass fail sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/PasswordFilePermissionTest.java pass fail sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiRegistrySslTest.java pass fail sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/SSLConfigFilePermissionTest.java pass fail sun/tools/jcmd/TestJcmdDefaults.java pass fail sun/tools/jcmd/TestJcmdSanity.java pass fail sun/tools/jstack/BasicJStackTest.java pass fail sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdPort.java pass fail sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdServer.java pass fail sun/tools/native2ascii/NativeErrors.java 16 differences The hotspot and langtools test results contain no differences. The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b07/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 20:50:13 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:50:13 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 09 April 2014 In-Reply-To: <00000145483c6a15-bf6e9a75-c9d3-4c6b-be97-a7a4a741e41a-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <00000145483c6a15-bf6e9a75-c9d3-4c6b-be97-a7a4a741e41a-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: This week's #AdoptOpenJDK newsletter - plenty on Java 8, lambdas, and Nashorn! http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=c58c2340-c027-11e3-b7b6-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paper.li Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:44 PM Subject: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 09 April 2014 To: sadhak001 at gmail.com Adopt OpenJDK community news! News from the grass roots, developer lead community programme for OpenJDK. OpenJDK is the open source project that is Java, the language and the platform! Published by @adoptopenjdk 09 April 2014 Technology #java #jvm Today's headline JavaOne 2014 [image: avatar] Shared by adoptopenjdk *www?.oracle.com * - Minds, Technology, Registration. All Open. JavaOne 2014 registration is open. Join up with the world's leading Java experts and community members. Advertisement Grow your customer base. Start a lead gen campaign on LaunchBit and cost-effectively grow your company today! 302 contributors - featured today: Read paper ? Email powered by [image: logo] If you have not requested this notification or wish not to receive paper notification updates in the future unsubscribe here. We are committed to protecting your privacy - more on our Privacy Policy. -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Apr 9 21:04:16 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:04:16 +0200 Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit In-Reply-To: <5345A134.8060000@oracle.com> References: <5345A134.8060000@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5345B5D0.1090604@oracle.com> The finest summit of the summer is coming. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:36:20 -0400 From: Brian Goetz To: lambda-dev at openjdk.java.net , Da Vinci Machine Project , jvm-languages at googlegroups.com === CALL FOR SPEAKERS -- JVM LANGUAGE SUMMIT, July 2014 === Dear colleague; We are pleased to announce the 2014 JVM Language Summit to be held at Oracle's Santa Clara campus on July 28-30, 2014. Registration is now open for speaker submissions (presentations and workshops) and will remain open until May 16, 2014. There is no registration fee for speakers. General attendee registration will open on May 7. For Oracle employees who wish to register as general attendees, please contact the organizers at inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. The JVM Language Summit is an open technical collaboration among language designers, compiler writers, tool builders, runtime engineers, and VM architects. We will share our experiences as creators of programming languages for the JVM and of the JVM itself. We also welcome non-JVM developers on similar technologies to attend or speak on their runtime, VM, or language of choice. The format this year will be similar to previous years; we've divided the schedule equally between traditional presentations and "Workshops". Workshops are informal, facilitated discussion groups among smaller, self-selected participants, and should enable "deeper dives" into the subject matter. If there is interest, there will also be impromptu "lightning talks". We encourage speakers to submit both a presentation and a workshop; we will arrange to schedule the presentation before the workshop, so that the presentation can spark people's interest and the workshop will allow those who are really interested to go deeper into the subject area. Workshop facilitators may, but are not expected to, prepare presentation materials, but they should come prepared to guide a deep technical discussion. The Summit is being organized by language and JVM engineers; no marketers involved! So bring your slide rules and be prepared for some seriously geeky discussions. Speaker registration is now open at: http://registration.jvmlangsummit.com If you have any questions, send inquiries to inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. We hope to see you in July! From SPOOLE at uk.ibm.com Thu Apr 10 08:00:41 2014 From: SPOOLE at uk.ibm.com (Steve Poole) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:00:41 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit In-Reply-To: <5345B5D0.1090604@oracle.com> References: <5345A134.8060000@oracle.com> <5345B5D0.1090604@oracle.com> Message-ID: on the subject of conferences - have we got anything Adopt like for J1 or other conferences planned? I hadn't noticed anything but a trifle busy so it might have passed me by From: dalibor topic To: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" Date: 09/04/2014 22:05 Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit Sent by: "adoption-discuss" The finest summit of the summer is coming. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:36:20 -0400 From: Brian Goetz To: lambda-dev at openjdk.java.net , Da Vinci Machine Project , jvm-languages at googlegroups.com === CALL FOR SPEAKERS -- JVM LANGUAGE SUMMIT, July 2014 === Dear colleague; We are pleased to announce the 2014 JVM Language Summit to be held at Oracle's Santa Clara campus on July 28-30, 2014. Registration is now open for speaker submissions (presentations and workshops) and will remain open until May 16, 2014. There is no registration fee for speakers. General attendee registration will open on May 7. For Oracle employees who wish to register as general attendees, please contact the organizers at inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. The JVM Language Summit is an open technical collaboration among language designers, compiler writers, tool builders, runtime engineers, and VM architects. We will share our experiences as creators of programming languages for the JVM and of the JVM itself. We also welcome non-JVM developers on similar technologies to attend or speak on their runtime, VM, or language of choice. The format this year will be similar to previous years; we've divided the schedule equally between traditional presentations and "Workshops". Workshops are informal, facilitated discussion groups among smaller, self-selected participants, and should enable "deeper dives" into the subject matter. If there is interest, there will also be impromptu "lightning talks". We encourage speakers to submit both a presentation and a workshop; we will arrange to schedule the presentation before the workshop, so that the presentation can spark people's interest and the workshop will allow those who are really interested to go deeper into the subject area. Workshop facilitators may, but are not expected to, prepare presentation materials, but they should come prepared to guide a deep technical discussion. The Summit is being organized by language and JVM engineers; no marketers involved! So bring your slide rules and be prepared for some seriously geeky discussions. Speaker registration is now open at: http://registration.jvmlangsummit.com If you have any questions, send inquiries to inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. We hope to see you in July! Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU From martijnverburg at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 11:42:51 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:42:51 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit In-Reply-To: References: <5345A134.8060000@oracle.com> <5345B5D0.1090604@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Steve, I think Richard W et al are planning a panel for J1 at the least. Cheers, Martijn On 10 April 2014 09:00, Steve Poole wrote: > on the subject of conferences - have we got anything Adopt like for J1 or > other conferences planned? I hadn't noticed anything but a trifle busy so > it might have passed me by > > > > > > From: dalibor topic > To: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" > > Date: 09/04/2014 22:05 > Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit > Sent by: "adoption-discuss" > > > > > The finest summit of the summer is coming. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:36:20 -0400 > From: Brian Goetz > To: lambda-dev at openjdk.java.net , Da > Vinci Machine Project , > jvm-languages at googlegroups.com > > === CALL FOR SPEAKERS -- JVM LANGUAGE SUMMIT, July 2014 === > > Dear colleague; > > We are pleased to announce the 2014 JVM Language Summit to be held at > Oracle's Santa Clara campus on July 28-30, 2014. Registration is now > open for speaker submissions (presentations and workshops) and will > remain open until May 16, 2014. There is no registration fee for > speakers. General attendee registration will open on May 7. For Oracle > employees who wish to register as general attendees, please contact the > organizers at inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. > > The JVM Language Summit is an open technical collaboration among > language designers, compiler writers, tool builders, runtime engineers, > and VM architects. We will share our experiences as creators of > programming languages for the JVM and of the JVM itself. We also welcome > non-JVM developers on similar technologies to attend or speak on their > runtime, VM, or language of choice. > > The format this year will be similar to previous years; we've divided > the schedule equally between traditional presentations and "Workshops". > Workshops are informal, facilitated discussion groups among smaller, > self-selected participants, and should enable "deeper dives" into the > subject matter. If there is interest, there will also be impromptu > "lightning talks". > > We encourage speakers to submit both a presentation and a workshop; we > will arrange to schedule the presentation before the workshop, so that > the presentation can spark people's interest and the workshop will allow > those who are really interested to go deeper into the subject area. > Workshop facilitators may, but are not expected to, prepare presentation > materials, but they should come prepared to guide a deep technical > discussion. > > The Summit is being organized by language and JVM engineers; no > marketers involved! So bring your slide rules and be prepared for some > seriously geeky discussions. > > Speaker registration is now open at: > > http://registration.jvmlangsummit.com > > If you have any questions, send inquiries to inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. > > We hope to see you in July! > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > From erik.joelsson at oracle.com Tue Apr 8 08:21:26 2014 From: erik.joelsson at oracle.com (Erik Joelsson) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:21:26 +0200 Subject: Proposal to update build documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5343B186.7090906@oracle.com> Build documentation is certainly in need of a lot of love. I'm sure Magnus will have something to add to this, but from me I very much welcome this initiative. /Erik On 2014-04-08 09:40, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi all, > > The Adoption Group is about to embark on it's migration of all of its > documentation on building OpenJDK (adoptopenjdk.java.net contains a bunch > of pages). We found your group page at > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/and wiki at > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Main and figured our > documentation should really fall under your gropup's banner (we can > reference it from the Adoption Group for new comers). > > So our proposal is to: > > 1.) Compare the docs that we have vs what's contained in the various > README-builds.html files > 2.) Send in patches to README-builds.html where appropriate > 3.) Only document temporary workarounds / known issues etc in the Build > group's wiki > > And the one I was more uncertain about: > > * Document uncommon build scenarios Build group's wiki, e.g. What certain > unusual flags mean and so forth. > > Does this sound reasonable? I'm happy to walk through the existing > documentation set that we have with someone so you have a clear idea on > what we're proposing to bring across. > > Cheers, > Martijn From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Thu Apr 10 21:09:02 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:09:02 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit In-Reply-To: References: <5345A134.8060000@oracle.com> <5345B5D0.1090604@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5347086E.7030607@tai-dev.co.uk> Hi Steve, A few of us in the group have floated the idea for a J1 panel submission. Dalibor has suggested that it could be a good idea to post something up to the Adoption wiki, and ask for contributions? I've also been chatting to Richard Warburton about a J1 submission (separate from the adoption work), and here we were thinking of 'Help build your JUG' focus. Best wishes, Daniel On 10/04/2014 09:00, Steve Poole wrote: > on the subject of conferences - have we got anything Adopt like for J1 or > other conferences planned? I hadn't noticed anything but a trifle busy so > it might have passed me by > > > > > > From: dalibor topic > To: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" > > Date: 09/04/2014 22:05 > Subject: Fwd: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit > Sent by: "adoption-discuss" > > > > > The finest summit of the summer is coming. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Call for Speakers -- 2014 JVM Language Summit > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:36:20 -0400 > From: Brian Goetz > To: lambda-dev at openjdk.java.net , Da > Vinci Machine Project , > jvm-languages at googlegroups.com > > === CALL FOR SPEAKERS -- JVM LANGUAGE SUMMIT, July 2014 === > > Dear colleague; > > We are pleased to announce the 2014 JVM Language Summit to be held at > Oracle's Santa Clara campus on July 28-30, 2014. Registration is now > open for speaker submissions (presentations and workshops) and will > remain open until May 16, 2014. There is no registration fee for > speakers. General attendee registration will open on May 7. For Oracle > employees who wish to register as general attendees, please contact the > organizers at inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. > > The JVM Language Summit is an open technical collaboration among > language designers, compiler writers, tool builders, runtime engineers, > and VM architects. We will share our experiences as creators of > programming languages for the JVM and of the JVM itself. We also welcome > non-JVM developers on similar technologies to attend or speak on their > runtime, VM, or language of choice. > > The format this year will be similar to previous years; we've divided > the schedule equally between traditional presentations and "Workshops". > Workshops are informal, facilitated discussion groups among smaller, > self-selected participants, and should enable "deeper dives" into the > subject matter. If there is interest, there will also be impromptu > "lightning talks". > > We encourage speakers to submit both a presentation and a workshop; we > will arrange to schedule the presentation before the workshop, so that > the presentation can spark people's interest and the workshop will allow > those who are really interested to go deeper into the subject area. > Workshop facilitators may, but are not expected to, prepare presentation > materials, but they should come prepared to guide a deep technical > discussion. > > The Summit is being organized by language and JVM engineers; no > marketers involved! So bring your slide rules and be prepared for some > seriously geeky discussions. > > Speaker registration is now open at: > > http://registration.jvmlangsummit.com > > If you have any questions, send inquiries to inquire at jvmlangsummit.com. > > We hope to see you in July! > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From martijnverburg at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 13:29:35 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:29:35 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: <5344689E.9070106@oracle.com> References: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> <5344689E.9070106@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Dalibor, Cool all understood - OK in that case the first page to shift is the front page. Can everybody review the following page: https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/AdoptOpenJDK - if there are no major issues I'll migrate and update links as needed. Cheers, Martijn On 8 April 2014 22:22, dalibor topic wrote: > I would go at it one by one - ask for review of a page/section on the > list, once everyone is happy, move it over. > > The thing I'd be cautious about is moving any pages where the editors are > not Group Members of the Adoption Group, as editing the pages on the > OpenJDK Wiki will require Group membership, and Group membership takes a > year, or so. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > > On 08.04.2014 10:53, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Hi Rory, >> >> *Absolutely* - I think we'll move over section by section, starting with >> the build docs - I've pinged the build group to let them know we'll be >> contributing to their docs/wiki. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> On 8 April 2014 09:50, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Martijn, >> >> I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good >> opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? >> >> My 2 cents. >> Rgds,Rory >> >> On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's >> experience here >> :-). >> >> We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things >> documented at >> adoptopenjdk.java.net . >> >> >> I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across >> concrete >> material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or >> even become >> new ones themselves. >> >> Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it >> all across, >> especially given that there's a process to make community >> initiatives part >> of or into official OpenJDK projects. >> >> Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net >> that folks would object >> >> to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would >> remain there >> at present. >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> -- >> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >> Quality Engineering Manager >> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >> >> >> > -- > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > From martijnverburg at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 13:38:47 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:38:47 +0100 Subject: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? In-Reply-To: References: <1CF6FDFD0639DF478B44651D79ECE704A4EA03DF@GSCMHKP12EX.firmwide.corp.gs.com> Message-ID: Hi all, To follow on from this we'll start migrating one page / section at a time - the build group would like us to help update their documentation, so we'll coordinate with them once we hit those pages / sections. Cheers, Martijn On 8 April 2014 08:41, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Sunny, > > Thanks! I think the best place to start is to review the existing build > documentation that comes with the source of OpenJDK vs what you, Mani and > the adoptopenjdk wiki has. I'd like for us to actually improve *that* > documentation first and use the wiki to document temporary workarounds and > rarer situations (perhaps things like fastdebug builds and so forth). > > I notice that the build group has a wiki - > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Main and in the spirit of us > helping out other groups and projects I suggest we co-ordinate with them > and have the vast majority of the build related documentation go there. > I've sent them a note. > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 8 April 2014 06:33, Chan, Sunny wrote: > >> I am happy to contribute to a quick start guide documentation - for >> example here is my blog entry on how to compile OpenJDK on Windows >> (probably need updating!) >> >> http://www.sunnychan.hk/roller/sunny/entry/how_to_compile_openjdk_on >> >> Perhaps an outline like this: >> >> 1) Prerequisite environment >> 2) Initial setup (e.g. getting the VM, etc) >> 3) How to compile, what are the options >> 4) Different type of builds (what is fastdebug? Etc) >> 5) How to start contributing (What bug to work on, etc) >> >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:48:30 -0700 >> From: Richard Warburton >> To: Daniel Bryant >> Cc: adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net >> Subject: Re: Move Google Getting Started Docs to OpenJDK Wiki? >> Message-ID: >> < >> CAMaYbvLUWY5BR5nwQbXBKC_o_qJ7LdpYhK-TfQRF63AkJxjyHg at mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hi, >> >> I believe a wiki format would make the documents more navigable, it would >> > increase shared ownership, and also be a positive step towards making >> > the wiki a full one stop shop for all things OpenJDK? >> > >> >> So I think the last time I discussed this with Mani and you guys there >> was complete consensus about moving to a wiki, but the issue was we needed >> to figure out how to incorporate the information. At the moment we have a >> sprawl of wiki pages with lots of detailed documentation. This is a good >> thing, but there's also need for a "quick start guide" type wiki page. So >> its not just integrating the google doc into the wiki, but figuring out >> how/where the information should lie. >> >> regards, >> >> Richard Warburton >> >> http://insightfullogic.com >> @RichardWarburto >> >> >> > From martijnverburg at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 14:13:35 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:13:35 +0100 Subject: FYI - I'm letting adoptopenjdk.org expire Message-ID: Hi all, FYI I'm letting this old domain expire - we're not going to need it with the new Adoption Group. Cheers, Martijn From mikeb at mycosystems.co.uk Sat Apr 12 15:20:03 2014 From: mikeb at mycosystems.co.uk (Mike Burton) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:20:03 +0100 Subject: Betterrev error - hg pull fails with: abort: repository is unrelated Message-ID: <854FEF7D-9A48-41C8-9C8C-55C091F7D20C@mycosystems.co.uk> I'm getting Betterrev error - hg pull fails with: abort: repository is unrelated [info] application - Running command: [/bin/sh, scripts/generate_webrev.sh, ., ssh://hg at bitbucket.org/karianna/better-test-repo, /Users/mikeburton/DEV/Java/BetterRev/betterrev_project/betterrev/public/webrevs/webrev-better-test-repo-2] [info] application - out > Revert to c29b583938b1 later [info] application - out > Pull the changeset in [debug] application - Created new Contribution - id: 1, bitbucket username: richardwarburton [debug] application - ImportPullRequestsEvent received. [debug] application - Created new Contribution - id: 74, bitbucket username: Differents [info] application - out > pulling from ssh://hg at bitbucket.org/karianna/better-test-repo [info] application - err > abort: repository is unrelated Same as if I run from command line: hg pull ssh://hg at bitbucket.org/karianna/better-test-repo Any ideas please? Best Regards Mike Burton From benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 18:09:38 2014 From: benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com (Ben Evans) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 19:09:38 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Next up: rawtype and unchecked lint warning cleanup In-Reply-To: <533F415D.4030903@oracle.com> References: <533F415D.4030903@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi, Just in case people missed this from Joe - might be a good place for another cleanup hack session. Thanks, Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Joseph Darcy Date: Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:33 AM Subject: Next up: rawtype and unchecked lint warning cleanup To: "jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net" Hello, With the serial javac lint warnings in the jdk repo resolved [1], the largest remaining category of lint warnings are for rawtypes and unchecked conversions. Both of these kind of warnings are related to incomplete generification and so they need to be addressed together. At the end of JDK 8, the jdk repo has approximately 4150 raw and unchecked warnings; in contrast, the JDK 9 dev jdk repo only has about 2800 raw and unchecked warnings. Clearing those remaining 2800 warnings will be tracked using subtasks of JDK-8039096 Fix raw and unchecked lint warnings in jdk libraries https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039096 Cheers, -Joe [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-April/000580.html From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Mon Apr 14 07:16:28 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:16:28 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: References: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> <5344689E.9070106@oracle.com> Message-ID: <534B8B4C.2010200@tai-dev.co.uk> Looks good to me Martijn - the only section that looks a bit dated is the Future Events, which mostly covers 2013 :-) Best wishes, Daniel On 12/04/2014 14:29, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > Cool all understood - OK in that case the first page to shift is the front > page. > > Can everybody review the following page: > https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/AdoptOpenJDK - if there are no > major issues I'll migrate and update links as needed. > > > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 8 April 2014 22:22, dalibor topic wrote: > >> I would go at it one by one - ask for review of a page/section on the >> list, once everyone is happy, move it over. >> >> The thing I'd be cautious about is moving any pages where the editors are >> not Group Members of the Adoption Group, as editing the pages on the >> OpenJDK Wiki will require Group membership, and Group membership takes a >> year, or so. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> >> On 08.04.2014 10:53, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >>> Hi Rory, >>> >>> *Absolutely* - I think we'll move over section by section, starting with >>> the build docs - I've pinged the build group to let them know we'll be >>> contributing to their docs/wiki. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>> On 8 April 2014 09:50, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Martijn, >>> >>> I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good >>> opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? >>> >>> My 2 cents. >>> Rgds,Rory >>> >>> On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's >>> experience here >>> :-). >>> >>> We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things >>> documented at >>> adoptopenjdk.java.net . >>> >>> >>> I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across >>> concrete >>> material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or >>> even become >>> new ones themselves. >>> >>> Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it >>> all across, >>> especially given that there's a process to make community >>> initiatives part >>> of or into official OpenJDK projects. >>> >>> Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net >>> that folks would object >>> >>> to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would >>> remain there >>> at present. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rgds,Rory O'Donnell >>> Quality Engineering Manager >>> Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >> >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Oracle is committed to developing >> practices and products that help protect the environment >> -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Apr 14 08:02:32 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:02:32 +0100 Subject: Whole-Scale move of Adopt OpenJDK programme to Adoption Group In-Reply-To: <534B8B4C.2010200@tai-dev.co.uk> References: <5343B850.3050404@oracle.com> <5344689E.9070106@oracle.com> <534B8B4C.2010200@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: Good point - we'll have to try and do better at registering the regular events we hold! I'll wait another 24 hours before shifting. Cheers, Martijn On 14 April 2014 08:16, Daniel Bryant wrote: > Looks good to me Martijn - the only section that looks a bit dated is the > Future Events, which mostly covers 2013 :-) > > Best wishes, > > Daniel > > > > On 12/04/2014 14:29, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Dalibor, > > Cool all understood - OK in that case the first page to shift is the front > page. > > Can everybody review the following page:https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/AdoptOpenJDK - if there are no > major issues I'll migrate and update links as needed. > > > > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 8 April 2014 22:22, dalibor topic wrote: > > > I would go at it one by one - ask for review of a page/section on the > list, once everyone is happy, move it over. > > The thing I'd be cautious about is moving any pages where the editors are > not Group Members of the Adoption Group, as editing the pages on the > OpenJDK Wiki will require Group membership, and Group membership takes a > year, or so. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > > On 08.04.2014 10:53, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > > Hi Rory, > > *Absolutely* - I think we'll move over section by section, starting with > the build docs - I've pinged the build group to let them know we'll be > contributing to their docs/wiki. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 8 April 2014 09:50, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland > > wrote: > > Hi Martijn, > > I am wary of copying en masse , it's like moving house, a good > opportunity to review and take only what is relevant/useful ? > > My 2 cents. > Rgds,Rory > > On 07/04/2014 20:39, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is aimed at everybody, but I'm leaning on Dalibor's > experience here > :-). > > We have a mass of projects, initiatives and other things > documented at > adoptopenjdk.java.net . > > > I initially thought to try and be cautious and only bring across > concrete > material that might become part of various OpenJDK projects or > even become > new ones themselves. > > Richard pointed out that it perhaps wasn't an issue to pull it > all across, > especially given that there's a process to make community > initiatives part > of or into official OpenJDK projects. > > Is there any part of of the adoptopenjdk.java.net > that folks would object > > to moving over? Code artifacts at GitHub and Bitbucket would > remain there > at present. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > -- > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell > Quality Engineering Manager > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland > > > > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 <+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961 <+491737185961> > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > > > > -- > * Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk > * > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: > @taidevcouk > From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Mon Apr 14 17:06:32 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:06:32 +0100 Subject: JDK 7u60 ea b14 test results now available Message-ID: <534C1598.7080102@oracle.com> JDK 7u60 ea b14 update release test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/7/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 1 new testcase. 0: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b13/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,926; fail: 13; not run: 815 1: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b14/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,927; fail: 13; not run: 815 0 1 Test --- pass com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/ReceiveIntoDirect.java 1 differences The hotspot and langtools test results are identical to b13 test results. Thanks Balchandra From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Apr 16 21:48:14 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 22:48:14 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK newsletter this week! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=ef841d30-c5a7-11e3-b7b6-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription Lots more Java, jvm, jdk8, & nashorn news to read! -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Tue Apr 22 14:38:42 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:38:42 +0100 Subject: JDK 8u20 ea b10 test results are now available Message-ID: <53567EF2.7080903@oracle.com> JDK 8u20 ea b10 test results are now available at: http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk, hotspot and langtools test results have few failures and we are investigating those failures. Nashorn test result is available at: http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u20-b10/emailable-report.html Regards Balchandra From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Wed Apr 23 09:03:06 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:03:06 +0100 Subject: JDK 7u60 ea b15 test results now available Message-ID: <535781CA.4010104@oracle.com> JDK 7u60 ea b15 update release test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/7/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 1 difference. 0: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b14/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,927; fail: 13; not run: 815 1: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b15/jdk/JTwork pass: 3,928; fail: 12; not run: 819 0 1 Test fail pass java/beans/Introspector/TestTypeResolver.java 1 differences The hotspot test results contain 2 differences. 0: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b14/hotspot/JTwork pass: 274; fail: 7; not run: 2 1: /home/jtest/merge7/jdk7u60-b15/hotspot/JTwork pass: 276; fail: 7; not run: 2 0 1 Test --- pass gc/arguments/TestDynMaxHeapFreeRatio.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestDynMinHeapFreeRatio.java 2 differences The langtools test results are identical to b14 test results. Thanks Balchandra From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 00:37:56 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 01:37:56 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK newsletter this week! Message-ID: http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=1699dec0-cb28-11e3-b7b6-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From sadhak001 at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 01:20:38 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:20:38 +0100 Subject: ThreadSafe static analysis tool for Java concurrency: now with command-line invocation Message-ID: Message: 4 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:09:47 +0100 From: Don Sannella To: concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu Subject: [concurrency-interest] ThreadSafe static analysis tool for Java concurrency: now with command-line invocation Message-ID: <534E8F2B.7070609 at contemplateltd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Contemplate has recently released a new version of ThreadSafe, an advanced static analysis tool that specifically targets Java concurrency defects and includes some dedicated treatment for java.util.concurrent. I have previously announced a ThreadSafe plugin for Eclipse on this list and invited feedback. New in this release is a command-line version of ThreadSafe which produces an HTML report with clickable links, giving ways of browsing findings and relating them to the source code. This makes ThreadSafe available to people who use IDEs other than Eclipse, and opens the way to integration with build/CI tools. We've also done some major surgery on ThreadSafe's analysis algorithms to improve the accuracy of its results, and made other improvements. An recent InfoQ article about ThreadSafe, showing examples of concurrency errors it finds in open source applications including Apache JMeter and K9Mail, is here: www.infoq.com/articles/Java-Concurrency-Static-Analysis-with-ThreadSafe As far as we've been able to determine, none of the bugs shown are caught by any other Java static analysis tool. You can see an example of the output of the command-line interface at: download.contemplateltd.com/projects/jmeter-2.10/index.html This is for the same version of Apache JMeter as was discussed in the InfoQ article. You can get a free two-week trial of ThreadSafe Solo (Eclipse plugin and command-line version) by filling out a simple webform at: http://www.contemplateltd.com/try-buy/request-a-trial A SonarQube plugin is also available for free trial. Please write to me if interested. More information is on Contemplate's website: www.contemplateltd.com/threadsafe As before, I'm interested in feedback and hope that you will help to spread the word! Best regards, Don Sannella -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Donald Sannella, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/dts dts at inf.ed.ac.uk +44 131 650 5184 and --------------------------------------------------------- Don Sannella d.sannella at contemplateltd.com Contemplate Ltd www.contemplateltd.com Appleton Tower, 11 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9LE, UK tel +44 7939 132117 fax +44 131 6503474 skype dsannella ------------------------------ -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Thu Apr 24 14:38:00 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:38:00 +0100 Subject: JDK 9 ea b09 test results now available Message-ID: <535921C8.7010501@oracle.com> JDK 9 ea b09 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 35 differences from b07 test results. We are investigating the test failures. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b07/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,684; fail: 24; not run: 937 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b09/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,696; fail: 25; error: 1; not run: 946 0 1 Test pass --- com/oracle/net/sanity.sh --- pass com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/ReceiveIntoDirect.java fail pass com/sun/tools/attach/BasicTests.java pass fail com/sun/tools/attach/PermissionTest.java pass fail java/io/BufferedInputStream/LargeCopyWithMark.java fail --- java/lang/instrument/NativeMethodPrefixAgent.java fail pass java/lang/instrument/PremainClass/NoPremainAgentTest.java pass fail java/lang/instrument/PremainClass/PremainClassTest.java pass fail java/lang/instrument/PremainClass/ZeroArgPremainAgentTest.java --- pass java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles/CatchExceptionTest.java --- pass java/net/ProxySelector/B8035158.java pass fail java/net/URLPermission/nstest/lookup.sh --- pass java/util/Arrays/StreamAndSpliterator.java --- pass java/util/zip/ZipFile/MultiThreadedReadTest.java --- pass javax/security/auth/kerberos/KerberosHashEqualsTest.java --- pass javax/security/auth/kerberos/KerberosTixDateTest.java --- pass javax/security/auth/kerberos/StandardNames.java --- pass javax/xml/bind/xjc/8032884/XjcOptionalPropertyTest.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/XPath/8035577/Regex.java --- pass javax/xml/jaxp/common/8035437/run.sh --- pass javax/xml/ws/8033113/WsImportTest.java --- pass javax/xml/ws/ebcdic/WsImportTest.java pass --- sun/jvmstat/monitor/MonitoredVm/CR6672135.java fail pass sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/PasswordFilePermissionTest.java fail pass sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiRegistrySslTest.java --- pass sun/security/krb5/auto/AddressesAndNameType.java --- pass sun/security/krb5/auto/UdpTcp.java --- pass sun/security/krb5/config/YesNo.java --- pass sun/security/krb5/etype/UnsupportedKeyType.java fail pass sun/tools/jinfo/Basic.sh pass fail sun/tools/jmap/BasicJMapTest.java fail pass sun/tools/jstack/BasicJStackTest.java pass fail sun/tools/jstat/JStatInterval.java pass error sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdExternalRegistry.java pass fail sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdUsage.java 35 differences The hotspot test results contain 40 differences and we are investigating the test failures. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b07/hotspot/JTwork pass: 468; fail: 12; error: 2; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b09/hotspot/JTwork pass: 497; fail: 22; error: 2; not run: 7 0 1 Test --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseBMI1InstructionsOnSupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseBMI1InstructionsOnUnsupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseCountLeadingZerosInstructionOnSupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseCountLeadingZerosInstructionOnUnsupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseCountTrailingZerosInstructionOnSupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/arguments/TestUseCountTrailingZerosInstructionOnUnsupportedCPU.java --- pass compiler/codegen/C1NullCheckOfNullStore.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestAndnI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestAndnL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsiI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsiL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsmskI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsmskL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsrI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestBlsrL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestLzcntI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestLzcntL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestTzcntI.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/bmi/TestTzcntL.java --- pass compiler/intrinsics/unsafe/UnsafeGetAddressTest.java --- pass compiler/whitebox/GetNMethodTest.java --- pass gc/TestGCLogRotationViaJcmd.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestDynMaxHeapFreeRatio.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestDynMinHeapFreeRatio.java --- pass gc/arguments/TestObjectTenuringFlags.java --- fail gc/g1/TestGCLogMessages.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationAgeThreshold.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationFullGC.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationInterned.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationMemoryUsage.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationPrintOptions.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationTableRehash.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationTableResize.java --- fail gc/g1/TestStringDeduplicationYoungGC.java --- pass runtime/CDSCompressedKPtrs/XShareAuto.java pass fail runtime/NMT/JcmdWithNMTDisabled.java --- pass runtime/SharedArchiveFile/CdsDifferentObjectAlignment.java --- pass runtime/SharedArchiveFile/CdsWriteError.java --- pass runtime/SharedArchiveFile/DefaultUseWithClient.java --- pass serviceability/jvmti/8036666/GetObjectLockCount.java 40 differences The langtools test results contain 18 differences. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/b07/langtools/JTwork pass: 2,966; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge9/b09/langtools/JTwork pass: 2,984; not run: 7 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/AnonymousSubclassTest.java --- pass tools/javac/ConstFoldTest.java --- pass tools/javac/OverrideChecks/IncompleteMessageOverride.java --- pass tools/javac/StdoutCloseTest.java --- pass tools/javac/T7053059/DoubleCastTest.java --- pass tools/javac/T8034044.java --- pass tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/CheckErrorsForSource7.java --- pass tools/javac/classreader/BadClass.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/environment/ProcessingEnvAnnoDiscovery.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/model/trees/OnDemandAttribution.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/model/util/DirectSuperOfInt.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/BaseClassesNotReRead.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/ClassDependingOnGenerated.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/CompleteOnClosed.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/MethodsDroppedBetweenRounds.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/OverwriteBetweenCompilations.java --- pass tools/javac/processing/rounds/TypesCachesCleared.java --- pass tools/javap/T8035104.java 18 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/b09/emailable-report.html Thanks Balchandra From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Apr 25 08:26:16 2014 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:26:16 +0100 Subject: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09, JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net Message-ID: <535A1C28.7090103@oracle.com> Hi All, Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09 , JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net. As we enter the later phases of development for JDK 7u60 & JDK 8u20 , please log any show stoppers as soon as possible. Rgds, Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com Mon Apr 28 09:54:17 2014 From: balchandra.vaidya at oracle.com (Balchandra Vaidya) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:54:17 +0100 Subject: JDK 8u20 ea b11 test results now available Message-ID: <535E2549.7050806@oracle.com> JDK 8u20 ea b11 test results are now available at: http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 18 differences. We are investigating the failed tests. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u20-b10/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,686; fail: 34; not run: 932 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u20-b11/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,697; fail: 22; error: 1; not run: 932 0 1 Test pass fail com/sun/tools/attach/BasicTests.java fail pass com/sun/tools/attach/ProviderTest.java fail pass java/beans/Introspector/Test8039776.java pass fail java/io/BufferedInputStream/LargeCopyWithMark.java pass fail java/net/URLPermission/nstest/lookup.sh fail pass java/time/tck/java/time/TCKLocalTime.java fail pass java/time/tck/java/time/format/TCKDateTimeFormatter.java fail pass java/time/tck/java/time/format/TCKDateTimeFormatterBuilder.java fail pass java/time/test/java/time/format/TestReducedParser.java fail pass javax/xml/ws/8033113/WsImportTest.java fail pass javax/xml/ws/ebcdic/WsImportTest.java fail pass jdk/net/Sockets/Test.java fail pass sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/CustomLauncherTest.java fail pass sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java fail pass sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdDefaults.java fail error sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdExternalRegistry.java fail pass sun/tools/jstatd/TestJstatdPortAndServer.java fail pass sun/util/calendar/zi/TestZoneInfo310.java 18 differences The hotspot test results have no differences from b10 test results. The langtools test results contain 8 differences, but no new failed tests. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u20-b10/langtools/JTwork pass: 2,977; fail: 6; error: 2; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u20-b11/langtools/JTwork pass: 2,985; not run: 7 0 1 Test fail pass tools/javac/AnonymousSubclassTest.java fail pass tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/CantAnnotateScoping.java fail pass tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/CheckErrorsForSource7.java fail pass tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/common/arrays/DeclarationAnnotation.java fail pass tools/javac/diags/CheckExamples.java error pass tools/javac/lambda/T8037935/LambdaWithBinOpConstRefToConstString.java fail pass tools/javac/lambda/T8038420/LambdaIncrement.java error pass tools/javac/varargs/MethodHandleCrash.java 8 differences Nashorn test result is available at: http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u20-b11/emailable-report.html Regards Balchandra From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 29 07:57:05 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:57:05 +0200 Subject: Apache Solr 4.8.0 released Message-ID: <535F5B51.8020003@oracle.com> Release announcement: http://markmail.org/message/mdx4s2ccl3pes5ql?q=list:org.apache.announce+order:date-backward&page=1 Notably, this is one of the FOSS projects on our QA outreach list at https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quality+Out+Reach declaring that they are now "fully compatible with Java 8". cheers, dalibor topic -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 09:39:39 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:39:39 +0100 Subject: Apache Solr 4.8.0 released In-Reply-To: <535F5B51.8020003@oracle.com> References: <535F5B51.8020003@oracle.com> Message-ID: Great news! I know Maven and Groovy are also just around the corner (only minor issues left) Cheers, Martijn On 29 April 2014 08:57, dalibor topic wrote: > Release announcement: http://markmail.org/message/ > mdx4s2ccl3pes5ql?q=list:org.apache.announce+order:date-backward&page=1 > > Notably, this is one of the FOSS projects on our QA outreach list at > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quality+Out+Reachdeclaring that they are now "fully compatible with Java 8". > > cheers, > dalibor topic > -- > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 29 15:17:19 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:17:19 +0200 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 Message-ID: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> Hi, as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report available on the wiki at https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft discussed earlier on this list. cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/2014-February/000065.html -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 16:24:03 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:24:03 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Dalibor, Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content Cheers, Martijn On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: > Hi, > > as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report > available on the wiki at > > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports > > I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight > Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft discussed > earlier on this list. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ > 2014-February/000065.html > -- > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment > From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Tue Apr 29 16:40:56 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:40:56 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> Message-ID: <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> Hi Dalibor, I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented an OpenJDK session within his company. Best wishes, Daniel On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) > for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >> available on the wiki at >> >> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >> >> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft discussed >> earlier on this list. >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >> 2014-February/000065.html >> -- >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >> >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Oracle is committed to developing >> practices and products that help protect the environment >> -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 17:00:13 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:00:13 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. Cheers, Martijn On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: > Hi Dalibor, > > I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! > > I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of > outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani > and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at > the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented > an OpenJDK session within his company. > > Best wishes, > > Daniel > > > > On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) >> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >>> available on the wiki at >>> >>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>> >>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>> discussed >>> earlier on this list. >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> >>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>> 2014-February/000065.html >>> -- >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>> >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>> >>> Oracle is committed to developing >>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>> >>> > -- > *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < > http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 > (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 29 17:13:00 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:13:00 +0200 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> Message-ID: <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is > following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the > ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt > OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). > > @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > >> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: >> >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >> >> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani >> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at >> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented >> an OpenJDK session within his company. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dalibor, >>> >>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) >>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >>>> available on the wiki at >>>> >>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>> >>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>> discussed >>>> earlier on this list. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> dalibor topic >>>> >>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>> -- >>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>> >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>> >>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>> >>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>> >>>> Oracle is committed to developing >>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >> -- >> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < >> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk >> From martijnverburg at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 17:45:00 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:45:00 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Dalibor, Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ * Javaland community sessions - http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ Cheers, Martijn On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: > Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for > future events to this list, as well, if possible. > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 +491737185961> > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > > On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is > following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the > ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt > OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). > > @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: > > Hi Dalibor, > > > I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! > > > I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of > > outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani > > and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at > > the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented > > an OpenJDK session within his company. > > > Best wishes, > > > Daniel > > > > > On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > > Hi Dalibor, > > > Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) > > for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: > > > Hi, > > > as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report > > available on the wiki at > > > https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports > > > I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight > > Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft > > discussed > > earlier on this list. > > > cheers, > > dalibor topic > > > [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ > > 2014-February/000065.html > > -- > > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > > Oracle is committed to developing > > practices and products that help protect the environment > > > > -- > > *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < > > http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > > daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk > > | +44 > > (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > > > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Apr 29 18:06:44 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor.topic at oracle.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:06:44 +0200 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Dalibor, > > Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: > > * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ > * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ > * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ > * Javaland community sessions - http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html > * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ > * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ > > Cheers, > Martijn > > >> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: >> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. >> >> -- >> Oracle >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 >> Oracle Java Platform Group >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment >> >>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is >>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the >>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt >>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). >>> >>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>> >>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >>>> >>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani >>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at >>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented >>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) >>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >>>>>> available on the wiki at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>>>> discussed >>>>>> earlier on this list. >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> dalibor topic >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>>>> >>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>>>> Oracle is committed to developing >>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>> -- >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < >>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > From SPOOLE at uk.ibm.com Tue Apr 29 21:17:37 2014 From: SPOOLE at uk.ibm.com (Steve Poole) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:17:37 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: I really like the style of this report Dalibor. Do you think we should have a section on our aspirations for the next quarter? From: "dalibor.topic at oracle.com" To: Martijn Verburg Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" Date: 29/04/2014 19:08 Subject: Re: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 Sent by: "adoption-discuss" Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi Dalibor, > > Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: > > * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ > * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ > * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ > * Javaland community sessions - http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html > * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ > * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ > > Cheers, > Martijn > > >> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: >> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. >> >> -- >> Oracle >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 >> Oracle Java Platform Group >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment >> >>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>> >>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is >>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the >>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt >>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). >>> >>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>> >>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >>>> >>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani >>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at >>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented >>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) >>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >>>>>> available on the wiki at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>>>> discussed >>>>>> earlier on this list. >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> dalibor topic >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>>>> >>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>>>> Oracle is committed to developing >>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>> -- >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < >>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk < https://twitter.com/taidevcouk> > Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU From sadhak001 at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 22:15:00 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:15:00 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: This link could also be used under the Javaland initiatives http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten/early-adopters-area.html A joint effort between LJC members and Javaland. Cheers, Mani -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Wed Apr 30 08:10:48 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:10:48 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5360B008.7080308@tai-dev.co.uk> I like the idea Steve! We've already got a talk lined up at Devoxx UK http://www.devoxx.co.uk/2014/04/adopt-openjdk-looking-behind-the-curtain-of-everyones-favourite-development-platform-2/ We've also submitted a few JavaOne talks (which I'm assuming will be a Q3 event) and I'm working on presenting something over in Poland soon, as unfortunately I couldn't convince them to run a hackday directly after the Geecon conference :-) Best wishes, Daniel On 29/04/2014 22:17, Steve Poole wrote: > I really like the style of this report Dalibor. Do you think we should > have a section on our aspirations for the next quarter? > > > > > > From: "dalibor.topic at oracle.com" > To: Martijn Verburg > Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" > > Date: 29/04/2014 19:08 > Subject: Re: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 > Sent by: "adoption-discuss" > > > > > Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | > Mobile:+491737185961 > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > >> On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg > wrote: >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: >> >> * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ >> * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ >> * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ >> * Javaland community sessions - > http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html >> * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ >> * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >>> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com > wrote: >>> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for > future events to this list, as well, if possible. >>> -- >>> Oracle >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 | > Mobile:+491737185961 >>> Oracle Java Platform Group >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>> >>> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment >>>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg > wrote: >>>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group > is >>>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on > the >>>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC > Adopt >>>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). >>>> >>>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant > wrote: >>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>> >>>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >>>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For > example, Mani >>>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 > days at >>>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also > presented >>>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe > two) >>>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Martijn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic > wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely > Report >>>>>>> available on the wiki at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before > midnight >>>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>> earlier on this list. >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> dalibor topic >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>>>>> Oracle is committed to > developing >>>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>>> -- >>>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | > www.tai-dev.co.uk < >>>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >>>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | > +44 >>>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk < > https://twitter.com/taidevcouk> > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk Wed Apr 30 08:12:40 2014 From: daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk (Daniel Bryant) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:12:40 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5360B078.9060709@tai-dev.co.uk> Mani and I also presented at FOSDEM as well, but I'm not sure if this fits under the Adoption banner? https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/from_webrev_to_betterrev/ Best wishes, Daniel On 29/04/2014 19:06, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: > Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. > > -- > Oracle > > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 > | Mobile:+491737185961 > > > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > > On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: >> >> * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - >> http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ >> * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - >> http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ >> * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - >> http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ >> * Javaland community sessions - >> http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html >> * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - >> http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ >> * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - >> http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com >> > > wrote: >> >> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement >> mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. >> >> -- >> Oracle > >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 > > | Mobile:+491737185961 >> > >> Oracle Java Platform Group >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. >> 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Green Oracle Oracle is >> committed to developing practices and products that help protect >> the environment >> >> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg >> > wrote: >> >>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption >>> Group is >>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a >>> handle on the >>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly >>> LJC Adopt >>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the >>> quarter). >>> >>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martijn >>> >>> >>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>> >>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >>>> >>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For >>>> example, Mani >>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session >>>> across 2 days at >>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also >>>> presented >>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal >>>>> (maybe two) >>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's >>>>>> Quartely Report >>>>>> available on the wiki at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before >>>>>> midnight >>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>>>> discussed >>>>>> earlier on this list. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> dalibor topic >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 >>>>> > | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>>>> >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>>>> >>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. >>>>>> 30143697 >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>>>> >>>>>> Oracle is committed to >>>>>> developing >>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | >>>> www.tai-dev.co.uk < >>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk >>>> >>>> | +44 >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: >>>> @taidevcouk >>>> >> -- *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk * daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk From martijnverburg at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 08:35:03 2014 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:35:03 +0100 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: I guess that depends if the quarterly reports retrospective or can they be forward looking as well? Cheers, Martijn On 29 April 2014 22:17, Steve Poole wrote: > I really like the style of this report Dalibor. Do you think we should > have a section on our aspirations for the next quarter? > > > > > > From: "dalibor.topic at oracle.com" > To: Martijn Verburg > Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net" < > adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net> > Date: 29/04/2014 19:08 > Subject: Re: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 > Sent by: "adoption-discuss" < > adoption-discuss-bounces at openjdk.java.net> > ------------------------------ > > > > Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 +491737185961> > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > > > On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > > > > Hi Dalibor, > > > > Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: > > > > * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ > > * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ > > * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ > > * Javaland community sessions - > http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html > > * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ > > * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > >> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com < > dalibor.topic at oracle.com> wrote: > >> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for > future events to this list, as well, if possible. > >> > >> -- > >> Oracle > >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 +491737185961> > >> Oracle Java Platform Group > >> > >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > >> > >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > >> > >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > >> > >> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > >> > >>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg > wrote: > >>> > >>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group > is > >>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on > the > >>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt > >>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). > >>> > >>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Martijn > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Dalibor, > >>>> > >>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of > >>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For > example, Mani > >>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 > days at > >>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also > presented > >>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. > >>>> > >>>> Best wishes, > >>>> > >>>> Daniel > >>>> > >>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Dalibor, > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe > two) > >>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Martijn > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely > Report > >>>>>> available on the wiki at > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before > midnight > >>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft > >>>>>> discussed > >>>>>> earlier on this list. > >>>>>> cheers, > >>>>>> dalibor topic > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ > >>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > >>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > >>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > >>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > >>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > >>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > >>>>>> Oracle is committed to > developing > >>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment > >>>> -- > >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | > www.tai-dev.co.uk < > >>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk > > | +44 > >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk < > https://twitter.com/taidevcouk> > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Apr 30 09:09:11 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:09:11 +0200 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5360BDB7.6080004@oracle.com> They are retrospective. The bylaws say at http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#group-lead "The obligation, once per quarter, to publish a written report summarizing the recent activities of the Group." Since we had not had a dedicated discussion on plans and aspirations for this quarter during Q1, I'd prefer to leave a 'Next Quarter Plans' section out of the Q1 report. For future quarters, i.e. starting with Q3 coming up in July, I'd suggest that I start a 'plans and aspirations' thread in the last month of a quarter - that would be June in Q2 for content related to Q3. cheers, dalibor topic On 30.04.2014 10:35, Martijn Verburg wrote: > I guess that depends if the quarterly reports retrospective or can they > be forward looking as well? > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 29 April 2014 22:17, Steve Poole > wrote: > > I really like the style of this report Dalibor. Do you think we > should have a section on our aspirations for the next quarter? > > > > > > From: "dalibor.topic at oracle.com " > > > To: Martijn Verburg > > Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net > " > > > Date: 29/04/2014 19:08 > Subject: Re: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 > Sent by: "adoption-discuss" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. > > -- > Oracle > > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 > | Mobile:+491737185961 > > > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed > to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > > > On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg > > wrote: > > > > Hi Dalibor, > > > > Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: > > > > * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ > > * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ > > * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ > > * Javaland community sessions - > http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html > > * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ > > * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - > http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > >> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com > > wrote: > >> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement > mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. > >> > >> -- > >> Oracle > > >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > >> Phone: +494089091214 > | Mobile:+491737185961 > > > >> Oracle Java Platform Group > >> > >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > >> > >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > >> > >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > >> > >> Green Oracle Oracle is > committed to developing practices and products that help protect the > environment > >> > >>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg > > wrote: > >>> > >>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the > Adoption Group is > >>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a > handle on the > >>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly > LJC Adopt > >>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the > quarter). > >>> > >>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Martijn > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant > > > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Dalibor, > >>>> > >>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of > >>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For > example, Mani > >>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session > across 2 days at > >>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has > also presented > >>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. > >>>> > >>>> Best wishes, > >>>> > >>>> Daniel > >>>> > >>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Dalibor, > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal > (maybe two) > >>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Martijn > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic > > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's > Quartely Report > >>>>>> available on the wiki at > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before > midnight > >>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial > draft > >>>>>> discussed > >>>>>> earlier on this list. > >>>>>> cheers, > >>>>>> dalibor topic > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ > >>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > Dalibor > Topic | Principal Product Manager > >>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 > > | Mobile: +491737185961 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > >>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > >>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > >>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > >>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > >>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. > 30143697 > >>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > >>>>>> Oracle is committed to > developing > >>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment > >>>> -- > >>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | > www.tai-dev.co.uk < > >>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* > >>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk > > | +44 > >>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 3AU > > -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Apr 30 09:36:45 2014 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:36:45 +0200 Subject: Draft quarterly report for Q1 2014 In-Reply-To: References: <535FC27F.6020001@oracle.com> <535FD618.3070608@tai-dev.co.uk> <9A641939-079E-48AE-A27C-F0355F194C70@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5360C42D.3010803@oracle.com> Done. On 29.04.2014 20:06, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: > Awesome, thanks! I'll add an events section including the FOSDEM meetup. > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment > >> On 29.04.2014, at 19:45, Martijn Verburg wrote: >> >> Hi Dalibor, >> >> Here are the ones that I can think of at Short notice: >> >> * Jan Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/156171922/ >> * Feb Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/161726622/ >> * Feb Meetup on Java 8 - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/165933122/ >> * Javaland community sessions - http://www.javaland.eu/en/programm/community-aktivitaeten.html >> * March Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/166254102/ >> * April Adopt OpenJDK Hack session - http://www.meetup.com/Londonjavacommunity/events/173279842/ >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >>> On 29 April 2014 18:13, dalibor.topic at oracle.com wrote: >>> Yes, URLs for last quarter's events please, and announcement mails for future events to this list, as well, if possible. >>> >>> -- >>> Oracle >>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile:+491737185961 >>> Oracle Java Platform Group >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>> >>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>> >>> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment >>> >>>> On 29.04.2014, at 19:00, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>> >>>> To me that would be a useful indicator to show that the Adoption Group is >>>> following one of its mandates yes. Daniel - if you've got a handle on the >>>> ones you, Mani, Javaland have run we can also add the monthly LJC Adopt >>>> OpenJDK hack the tower session (so that's another 3 for the quarter). >>>> >>>> @Dalibor - let me know if you need URLs for that. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martijn >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2014 17:40, Daniel Bryant wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>> >>>>> I'll second Martijn's comments - this looks great! >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to ask whether we wanted to report on the number of >>>>> outreach/evangelism events we run under the group banner? For example, Mani >>>>> and I ran a OpenJDK 'Early Adopters' Hackergarten session across 2 days at >>>>> the recent JavaLand Conference, and I fairly sure Mani has also presented >>>>> an OpenJDK session within his company. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> On 29/04/2014 17:24, Martijn Verburg wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dalibor, >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like a good start - I hope to have one project proposal (maybe two) >>>>>> for the next quarter as well as shifting over the content >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Martijn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29 April 2014 16:17, dalibor topic wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> as discussed earlier [0], I made a draft of this Group's Quartely Report >>>>>>> available on the wiki at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/Quarterly+Reports >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to publish it tomorrow, Wednesday April 30th before midnight >>>>>>> Hamburg time. The report follows the format and the initial draft >>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>> earlier on this list. >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> dalibor topic >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/adoption-discuss/ >>>>>>> 2014-February/000065.html >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >>>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >>>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >>>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >>>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >>>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >>>>>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >>>>>>> Oracle is committed to developing >>>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment >>>>> -- >>>>> *Daniel Bryant | Software Development Consultant | www.tai-dev.co.uk < >>>>> http://www.tai-dev.co.uk/>* >>>>> daniel.bryant at tai-dev.co.uk | +44 >>>>> (0) 7799406399 | Twitter: @taidevcouk >> -- Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 22:46:36 2014 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:46:36 +0100 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK Newsletter is out! Message-ID: Lots of Java 8, Lambdas, Devoxx UK and Nashorn this week! http://paper.li/adoptopenjdk/1370465075?edition_id=405aea30-d0a8-11e3-b7b6-00259071bfed&utm_campaign=paper_sub&utm_medium=email&utm_source=subscription -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector* | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2014:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!*