Adopt OpenJDK @ BG JUG, Step 2

[Ivan St. Ivanov]

Hey Martijn,

Here it is: http://www.
dmitryalexandrov.net/webrev/

Thanks,
Ivan
On Apr 1, 2014 6:51 PM, "Martijn Verburg" <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
>
> Are you able to host it in a non Google Drive location?  Unfortunately
> Google Drive doesn't act as a 'real' web server and so you get the raw HTML
> as opposed to the output displayed.  I/we should then be able to give some
> advice on the suitability.
>
> On the other question, it's usually best to have one patch per issue.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
> On 1 April 2014 16:45, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rory,
>>
>> Yes, I have read it. I am asking something different. My question is
>> whether, provided we follow the process, the type of change would be
>> accepted. Or it would get rejected only because it does not bring any
>> tangible value to the project.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland <
>> rory.odonnell at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> >  Hi Ivan,
>> >
>> > Did you have a chance to read Martijn's New Contributor wiki page here<
>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/New+Contributor>
>> >
>> > It describes step by step how a new contributor should get involved.
>> >
>> > Rgds, Rory
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 31/03/2014 20:39, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I am Ivan from the Bulgarian Java User Group. We started end of last
>> year
>> > our Adopt OpenJDK efforts. As proposed on the wiki, we started with
>> initial
>> > presentation of the concepts to the JUG. We had a dedicated JUG meeting
>> and
>> > two talks by Mani from LJC on a couple of conferences in Sofia. Then we
>> set
>> > up Open JDK VM, that we shared to be used by our JUG members. In fact I
>> > think that Mani's quick start document is referring to our VMs for
>> > download. Last month we had Lambdas workshop in the JUG, where along
>> with a
>> > presentation of the great new feature in Java 8, we did a hands-on lab
>> on
>> > the well known Lambda tutorial.
>> >
>> > Now, it's time for the next step. According to the wiki, a good thing to
>> > start with is doing some small fixes like applying project coin or
>> lambdas
>> > to some JDK methods. I decided to set up locally Java 9. Earlier this
>> week
>> > I met (guess whom?) Mani at JavaLand and he advised me to run IntelliJ's
>> > code analysis to find some candidates for such small fixes. Based on
>> that I
>> > created a really small patch, just to walk down the path, before going
>> to
>> > the JUG. Here is a link to the webrev archive that I created:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zkCj4qHzcrR1k3TC1Qd3B4RWM.
>> >
>> > So, I have the following questions:
>> >
>> > - Do you think that such type of change would be welcome? If not, would
>> you
>> > recommend what should we do before going to JBUG? If yes, we will go on
>> in
>> > our JUG and find some other such small issues and even add test cases
>> for
>> > them
>> > - Would you recommend having one big patch for all the changes that we
>> > find, or you think it is better to have one patch per issue
>> >
>> > Special thanks to Mani for all the help that he's been giving our JUG in
>> > the last few months!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Ivan
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
>> > Quality Engineering Manager
>> > Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>