Proposing projects for OpenJDK

[dalibor topic]

On 25.02.2014 16:34, Mario Torre wrote:
> Having JitWatch as an OpenJDK project, definitely no issues, but
> having JitWatch being part of OpenJDK (that is, distributed like jhat,
> for instance, which was I think what we were discussing), then yes,
> because it would require an external component that is not part of
> core the API.

I see what you mean. I thought the discussion was about new Projects, 
rather than about adding utilities to JDK releases.

Yes, the bar for adding a new utility to a JDK release would be much 
higher than the bar for a new Project. There would be JEPs. ;)

cheers,
dalibor topic
-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment