[rfc] jtreg's jenkins out of sync?
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Apr 20 08:27:53 UTC 2015
On 04/19/2015 08:07 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those wondering, this resolved itself.
ok. I did:)
How did it resolved itself?
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
The build Mani started already had my deeply wonted change.
But I think the question is still in place - Why build, initiated by change 156 in repo was based on changeset 155...
I do not mean ti somehow wrongly, But seems wrong to me.
Thanx!
J.
>
> On 17 April 2015 at 18:09, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that jenkins is not pulling latest changesets as expected:
>
> Look to the:
> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/
> It is now latest build. It clearly says that it was started by scm change, last change is the jdk.version.major bla bla bal...
>
> But - download the jar and you will find my changeset missing.
> Looking to the output: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/consoleText
>
> It clearly says:
> $ hg clone --rev default --noupdate http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> added 157 changesets with 1542 changes to 650 files
> [jtreg] $ hg update --rev default
> 623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {node}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {rev}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev e88738b571dee0fb28e40ef14260b78fa267e4f3
> changeset: 155:e88738b571de
> user: jjg
> date: Mon Mar 30 17:56:11 2015 -0700
> summary: Improved asmtools handling
>
>
> Which is the my_comit-1. And is Also a bit surprising. Because my Changeset had id 156. The clone cloned 157 chnagesets but as tip was used 155.
>
> So maybe there is -2 instead -1 somewhere :))
>
> Nope, joking... If you may fix/reschedule whatever I will be glad. I do not wont to upload on my machines my self built version.
>
>
> TY and sorry if I'm wrong...
>
> J.
>
>
>
More information about the adoption-discuss
mailing list