[rfc] jtreg's jenkins out of sync?
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Tue Apr 28 12:37:50 UTC 2015
On 04/21/2015 12:28 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote:
> @Jiri, here's the link to 156, contributed by you -
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg/rev/7906b5ebfc75
>
> and I cleared the workspace again and rebuilt jreg, here's the head of the logs:
The log are always like this.
Today, colleague of my team was again downloading latest build. And the change was agian missing:(
Maybe just push some fix to javadoc and rebuild:) (but stil the issue will be valid)
J.
>
> Building remotely on78eb14ac <https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/computer/78eb14ac> (lxc-fedora17 m1.small small) in workspace /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
> $ hg clone --rev default --noupdatehttp://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> added 157 changesets with 1542 changes to 650 files
> [jtreg] $ hg update --rev default
> 623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {node}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {rev}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev 7906b5ebfc75d9b39033acfcc56c627898a782a4
> changeset: 156:7906b5ebfc75
> tag: tip
> user: jjg
> date: Thu Apr 16 17:45:57 2015 -0700
> summary: Add support for jdk.version.major for use in @requires
>
> [jtreg] $ hg log --template "<changeset node='{node}' author='{author|xmlescape}' rev='{rev}' date='{date}'><msg>{desc|xmlescape}</msg><added>{file_adds|stringify|xmlescape}</added><deleted>{file_dels|stringify|xmlescape}</deleted><files>{files|stringify|xmlescape}</files><parents>{parents}</parents></changeset>\n" --rev default:0 --follow --prune 7906b5ebfc75d9b39033acfcc56c627898a782a4 --encoding UTF-8 --encodingmode replace
> [jtreg] $ /bin/bash /tmp/hudson578058129869953677.sh
> Tag: jtreg4.1-b11
> VersionNumber: 4.1
> BuildNumber: b11
> destination directory: jtreg
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> added 146 changesets with 1518 changes to 650 files
> updating to branch default
> 623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
> changeset: 145:04f40c388713
> tag: tip
> user: jjg
> date: Thu Mar 12 12:55:02 2015 -0700
> summary: include resource file in image
>
> tip 145:04f40c388713
> jtreg4.1-b10 114:8c3179c3ebda
> jtreg4.1-b09 84:c54815dea64c
> jtreg4.1-b08 80:e08a5e0b79ba
> jtreg4.1-b07 53:8ab579624a50
> jtreg4.1-b06 33:d47a6e238c3e
> jtreg4.1-b05 8:46b8c02be3b3
> jtreg4.1-b04 6:cbc1f04a52ea
> jtreg4.1-b03 4:bd7a3ed1210f
> jtreg4.1-b02 2:2cf779985e18
> jtreg4.1-b01 0:9f51ef22f00a
>
>
> Also remembered that we only build from the tip and the tip shows 145:04f40c388713 (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg/rev/04f40c388713).
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mani
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Mani Sarkar <sadhak001 at gmail.com <mailto:sadhak001 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All I did to refresh the build was clearing the workspace - and it is the best I can control
> from our end.
>
> @Jiri - have you tried fetching the source and building it locally?
>
> @Jonathan - any ideas what Jiri is experience, something you know about?
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2015 12:59 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
> Hmm,
>
> I think Mani did see that change set in there, Mani?
>
>
> I thought so. It is correctly in hg log of build.
>
> But Nope. Non of the build s sine /265/ do not have it.
> Most surprising is, that also workspace (accessible via webgui) is missing this changeset.
>
>
> J.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 20 April 2015 at 11:13, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2015 10:45 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
> Mercurial sometimes gets out of synch/date. It usually resolves itself on the
> next change set.
>
>
> Sorry again.
>
>
> I have checked the built jars and worksapces. The last chngeset is still missing...
>
> I feel little bit bad about that. But that hg out of sync is quite strong...
>
> J.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 20 April 2015 at 09:27, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>>> wrote:
>
> On 04/19/2015 08:07 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For those wondering, this resolved itself.
>
>
> ok. I did:)
>
> How did it resolved itself?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
>
> The build Mani started already had my deeply wonted change.
>
> But I think the question is still in place - Why build, initiated by
> change 156 in repo was based on changeset 155...
>
> I do not mean ti somehow wrongly, But seems wrong to me.
>
>
> Thanx!
>
> J.
>
>
> On 17 April 2015 at 18:09, Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com
> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com> <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com <mailto:jvanek at redhat.com>>>>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that jenkins is not pulling
> latest changesets as expected:
>
> Look to the:
> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/
> It is now latest build. It clearly says that it was started by
> scm change, last change is the jdk.version.major bla bla bal...
>
> But - download the jar and you will find my changeset missing.
> Looking to the output:
> https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/265/consoleText
>
> It clearly says:
> $ hg clone --rev default --noupdate
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg /scratch/jenkins/workspace/jtreg
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> added 157 changesets with 1542 changes to 650 files
> [jtreg] $ hg update --rev default
> 623 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files
> unresolved
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {node}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev . --template {rev}
> [jtreg] $ hg log --rev e88738b571dee0fb28e40ef14260b78fa267e4f3
> changeset: 155:e88738b571de
> user: jjg
> date: Mon Mar 30 17:56:11 2015 -0700
> summary: Improved asmtools handling
>
>
> Which is the my_comit-1. And is Also a bit surprising. Because my
> Changeset had id 156. The clone cloned 157 chnagesets but as tip was used 155.
>
> So maybe there is -2 instead -1 somewhere :))
>
> Nope, joking... If you may fix/reschedule whatever I will be
> glad. I do not wont to upload on my machines my self built version.
>
>
> TY and sorry if I'm wrong...
>
> J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog
> <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk &
> @adoptajsr programs)
> *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket
> <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>** |
> **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>*
> *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/
>
> */Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!/*
>
>
>
>
> --
> @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog
> <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr
> programs)
> *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket
> <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>** | **LinkedIn
> <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>*
> *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/
>
> */Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!/*
More information about the adoption-discuss
mailing list