jtreg jenkins builds 4.1 and calls it 4.2-snapshot

Mani Sarkar sadhak001 at gmail.com
Thu May 14 21:52:14 UTC 2015


Hi Stanislav,

Your script looks good, very similar to ours on the Cloudbees instance
(just did a compare). Except we don't build from tip and tag.

We will be happy to get good parts of your script - I like the version
numbers you have been extracting.

The last I remember (let me dig the emails) that we were adviced to build
from the tag, hence this line:

tagName=$(hg tags | grep jtreg | head -1 | gawk '{ print $1 }')

and then

hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg -r ${tagName}

I'll tidy up the script so that we can improve this script.

Cheers,
Mani

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Stanislav Baiduzhyi <sbaiduzh at redhat.com>
wrote:

> So, inspired by original script but heavily reorganized to build both tip
> and
> latest tag:
> https://gist.github.com/TheIndifferent/8573be7b18c2fdcf772f
>
> As can be seen in the logs of latest builds, asmtools was missing, so had
> to
> expand that one. And build now happens 2 times, one of them is for latest
> tag
> left without much modification, and added the current tip building as 4.2.0
> snapshot.
>
> Main concern at the moment is when the project will move to 4.3 snapshots
> the
> hardcoded constant has to be modified.
>
> Would like to hear any objections or improvement suggestions, maybe it will
> make sense to follow jenkins advice and add that script to the source repo
> and
> launch from there...
>
> On Wednesday 13 May 2015 11:49:00 Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > Hi Stanislav,
> >
> > You've been added.  Mani is the original author for the build scripts
> here
> > so you'll want to get a review from him.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 13 May 2015 at 11:42, Stanislav Baiduzhyi <sbaiduzh at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi Martijn,
> > >
> > > Thanx for fast response. I've just created an account via github, login
> > > TheIndifferent, email baiduzhyi.devel at gmail.com.
> > >
> > > I am confident but I would not like to do something without approval,
> so
> > > my
> > > plan is to check current build configuration and propose changes to
> this
> > > mailing list first, and apply them if there will be no objections.
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 13 May 2015 11:17:22 Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > > > Hi Stanislav,
> > > >
> > > > Do you have a Cloudbees account?  Happy to add you if you're
> confident
> > > > on
> > > > Jenkins and OpenJDK build matters.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Martijn
> > > >
> > > > On 13 May 2015 at 10:08, Stanislav Baiduzhyi <sbaiduzh at redhat.com>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I was wondering why jtreg 4.2-SNAPSHOT on jenkins does not include
> any
> > > > > changes
> > > > > since 2 month ago. Doing small investigation, here is the result:
> > > > > 4.2-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > and 4.1-b11 is the same package, taken from the tag jtreg4.1-b11 in
> > >
> > > jtreg
> > >
> > > > > source.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could anyone please look at that, or give me permissions to fix it
> > >
> > > myself?
> > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >     Stas
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >     Stas
>
> --
> Regards,
>     Stas
>
>


-- 
@theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>*  |  **Blog
<http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>**  |  *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate
(@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs)
*Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector
<https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>*  |  **Bitbucket
<https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * |  **Github
<https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * |  **LinkedIn
<http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>*
*Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/

*Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come
chasing after you!*


More information about the adoption-discuss mailing list