JDK 9 Outreach

[Martijn Verburg]

Hi Carl,

I can put you in touch with some Google folks, I'll do that off-line and
introduce you to Johan Vos as well who's heavily involved in the OpenJDK
mobile stuff.

Cheers,
Martijn

On 24 November 2015 at 11:45, Carl Jokl <carl at jokl.co.uk> wrote:

> I also reached out to the head of the project for Java on modern mobile
> O/S platforms to say I really want to be involved in the effort. It is a
> shame the LJC conference is on the same day as Google's GDG conference as I
> was hoping to try and get some good contacts on Googles Android team. I
> have been working at this for some time but Google is so big is is really
> hard just to find someone who knows the right person to talk to or if the
> suggested people are difficult to get hold of. I suspect Apple could be
> even worse that way. I have friends in Microsoft but not working with the
> Mobile team but they might help me get in touch with the right people.
>
> Regards
>
> Carl
>
> On 24 November 2015 at 11:16, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, there's Java SE for embedded (think Raspberry Pis and the like).
>> There are significant differences between Java ME for embedded and Java SE
>> for embedded, see
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/embedded/resources/tech/java-se-emb-vs-java-me-cdc-2157146.html
>> for details.
>>
>> There's also a new OpenJDK project proposed for mobile (
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2015-September/000200.html)
>> which I'm quite excited about.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 24 November 2015 at 09:26, Carl Jokl <carl at jokl.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> I would just check that to my knowledge as regards the mobile and
>>> embedded
>>> version of Java it is essentially now based on a JavaSE VM unless using
>>> CLDC? (when needing to run a VM in less than about 20MB of ram).
>>>
>>> Are there any noteworthy differences between the Java 9 targeted at
>>> Mobile
>>> and Embedded to be aware of? I expect that at least bytecode wise it will
>>> be the same excluding CLDC versions.
>>>
>>> Carl
>>>
>>> On 11 September 2015 at 06:29, Mani Sarkar <sadhak001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Dalibor,
>>> >
>>> > I have couple more suggestions to expand the great JDK 9 Outreach even
>>> > further:
>>> >
>>> > 1. The major version token in the output of  javap -verbose SomeClass,
>>> > returns
>>> > 52 for both JDK 8 and JDK 9 compiled sources. It would be helpful to
>>> > mention this so everyone is aware of it, as no new byte codes have been
>>> > introduced in 9. In theory I could run JDK 9 compiled code in the JDK8
>>> > environment (sometimes with a little tweak - again is it advisable to
>>> do
>>> > this or not, upto you if yoi want to add this as well). Please let me
>>> know
>>> > if all this is true.
>>> >
>>> > 2. setAccessible - this is now not accessible with the new JDK 9 EA
>>> builds
>>> > ? Has this been recent or since long. Not sure if this is mentioned
>>> > specifically in the outreach documentation.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Mani
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>*  |  **Blog
>>> > <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>**  |  *LJC Associate & LJC
>>> Advocate
>>> > (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs)
>>> > *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector
>>> > <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>*  |  **Bitbucket
>>> > <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * |  **Github
>>> > <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * |  **LinkedIn
>>> > <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>*
>>> > *Come to Devoxx UK 2016:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/
>>> >
>>> > *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will
>>> come
>>> > chasing after you!*
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>