OCA Signatory Check and the Census Page
Martijn Verburg
martijnverburg at gmail.com
Wed Sep 16 19:50:45 UTC 2015
We do actually have a Java component we wrote as part of the Betterrev
project. The project is discontinued, but take a look at the source in
https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev
Cheers,
Martijn
On 16 September 2015 at 20:27, Sebastian Sickelmann <
sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> because i don't get any answer in discuss at openjdk i want to ask what do
> you think about this.
>
> see original-mail below.
>
> What is your experience?
> Have you seen this too?
> How often has you seen this situation?
> Do you think there is room for optimization?
>
> Thanks
> Sebastian
>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Betreff: OCA Signatory Check and the Census Page
> Datum: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 16:36:58 +0200
> Von: Sebastian Sickelmann <sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de>
> An: discuss at openjdk.java.net
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> my name is Sebastian Sickelmann and I signed the OCA a few years ago. I am
> actually starting to spend some time again to openjdk contributions.
>
> The OCA-Signatory-Check that every OpenJDK member does before accepting a
> contribution is doing very well. But I observed that most checks are done
> against the census-page. Which is a good idea because it lists everyone
> that has at least author-level. But unfortunatly not the OCA-signatories.
>
> Is there a good way to check also against the OCA-Signatory[1] list? Is it
> possible to link or embed it from/into the census.
>
> Thanks
> Sebastian
>
> [1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the adoption-discuss
mailing list