OpenJDK contribution

dalibor topic dalibor.topic at oracle.com
Fri Aug 5 08:14:10 UTC 2016


Not applicable to 9.

On 05.08.2016 10:06, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
> For the uninitiated, what does 9-na mean? :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 5 August 2016 at 08:56, dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at oracle.com
> <mailto:dalibor.topic at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Actually, this one is marked 9-na, so please just start a thread on
>     jdk8u-dev as outlined in http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>     <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/> section 2 to discuss your idea
>     first, before you start working on a patch.
>
>     cheers,
>     dalibor topic
>
>
>     On 05.08.2016 09:48, dalibor topic wrote:
>
>         If you'd like to make a change in JDK 8 Updates, you need to
>         make it in
>         JDK 9 first, get it accepted there, and then backport it.
>
>         Please see http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/
>         <http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/> for details.
>
>         cheers,
>         dalibor topic
>
>         On 04.08.2016 23:51, Manuela Grindei wrote:
>
>             Hi Martin,
>             Thank you for the clarifications. I managed to get the
>             sources and
>             found the list of tests under needs_compact3 in TEST.groups.
>             I added
>             the test there and confirmed that compact1 and compact2
>             exclude the
>             tests in needs_compact3.
>
>             I think this should fix the bug. What's the next step,
>             should I create
>             a patch for jdk8u?
>             Thank you once more for your invaluable support,
>             Manuela
>
>                   From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com
>             <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
>              To: Manuela Grindei <manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk
>             <mailto:manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk>>
>             Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
>             <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>"
>             <adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
>             <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>>
>              Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016, 9:42
>              Subject: Re: OpenJDK contribution
>
>             Hi Manuela,
>             These test files are typically not shipped with vendor specific
>             implementations of OpenJDK (of which Oracle's is the most
>             common).
>             You'll want to take a look at the OpenJDK source code for
>             the Java 8
>             updates project as well as the ongoing Java 9 development.
>             See the Building your own OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 9 sections
>             in the
>             Getting Started guide.
>             https://adoptopenjdk.gitbooks.io/adoptopenjdk-getting-started-kit/content/en/
>             <https://adoptopenjdk.gitbooks.io/adoptopenjdk-getting-started-kit/content/en/>
>
>             NOTE:  For the Building OpenJDK 8 you'll actually want to
>             use the Java
>             8 Updates project, so in the guide where it says:
>             hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8
>             <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8> jdk8
>             You'll want to replace that with:
>             hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u
>             <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u> jdk8u
>
>             Cheers,
>             Martijn
>             On 3 August 2016 at 23:02, Manuela Grindei
>             <manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk>>
>             wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>             I'm currently investigating JDK-8154066  and it seems to
>             affect only
>             JDK8, not JDK9.
>
>             I unzipped the src folder from jdk1.8.0_51and opened it in
>             Intellij to
>             see the sources of Java 8 (my laptop uses Windows 10), but I
>             couldn't
>             find the place where these profiles are configured yet.
>
>             Does anyone know where the tests for each profile are defined?
>
>             Thanks,
>             Manuela
>                   From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com
>             <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
>              To: Manuela Grindei <manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk
>             <mailto:manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk>>
>             Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
>             <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>"
>             <adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net
>             <mailto:adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>>
>              Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2016, 20:44
>              Subject: Re: OpenJDK contribution
>
>             Hi Manuela,
>             I understand that you've gone through the getting started kit.
>             https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154066
>             <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154066> might be
>             a nice first
>             issue to look at.  Basically it seems to involve moving a
>             test into
>             the compact 3 profile group.
>             I assume you have the jdk9 forest checked out locally?  See
>             if you can
>             execute the
>             java/util/logging/TestLogConfigurationDeadLockWithConf.java test
>             (using jtreg) and figure out how to move it from the compact
>             1 and 2
>             profiles into the compact 3 profile.
>             Please do ask questions here if you get stuck and we'll all
>             learn more
>             together!
>
>
>             Cheers,
>             Martijn
>             On 2 August 2016 at 15:22, Martijn Verburg
>             <martijnverburg at gmail.com <mailto:martijnverburg at gmail.com>>
>             wrote:
>
>             Hi Manuela,
>             Have you gone through the Getting Started Kit?
>             Cheers,
>             Martijn
>             On 1 August 2016 at 14:27, Manuela Grindei
>             <manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:manuelag2004 at yahoo.co.uk>>
>             wrote:
>
>             Hi everyone,
>             I have recently had my OCA approved and I'm now keen to
>             contribute to
>             OpenJDK. Which issues would you recommend to a new starter?
>             Cheers,
>             Manuela Grindei
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>     Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>     <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>     <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>
>     ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>     Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>     Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>
>     Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>     Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>     Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>     Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment
>     <http://www.oracle.com/commitment>> Oracle is committed to developing
>     practices and products that help protect the environment
>
>

-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment


More information about the adoption-discuss mailing list