From nhoj.patrick at gmail.com Sat Jan 2 20:32:15 2016 From: nhoj.patrick at gmail.com (John Patrick) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 20:32:15 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 ea 99 java.version Message-ID: evening, Does anyone know how to override the java.version field? Wanting to help out with getting JDK 9 ready, using it and building projects with it. Most patches I've submitted so far as simply bumping which is the min java version being used from 1.5 to 1.6. One issue that I can't figure a work around for java.version. I'm getting the following error from maven-javadoc-plugin. [WARNING] Unable to find the javadoc version: Unrecognized version of Javadoc: 'java version "9-ea" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9-ea+ 99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9-ea+ 99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc, mixed mode) ' near index 37 (?s).*?([0-9]+\.[0-9]+)(\.([0-9]+))?.* ^ [WARNING] Using the Java the version instead of, i.e. 0.0 [WARNING] -quiet option is not supported on Java version < 1.4. Ignore this option. My question is should maven and every other project accept 9-ea as a valid java.version string, or could build 100 plus tweak the java.version string to something else that is considered valid. Cheers, John From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Sun Jan 3 08:09:10 2016 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:09:10 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 ea 99 java.version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5688D726.6010506@oracle.com> On 02/01/2016 20:32, John Patrick wrote: > evening, > > Does anyone know how to override the java.version field? > > Wanting to help out with getting JDK 9 ready, using it and building > projects with it. > > Most patches I've submitted so far as simply bumping which is the min > java version being used from 1.5 to 1.6. > > One issue that I can't figure a work around for java.version. I'm > getting the following error from maven-javadoc-plugin. > > [WARNING] Unable to find the javadoc version: Unrecognized version of > Javadoc: 'java version "9-ea" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build > 9-ea+99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc > ) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build > 9-ea+99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc > , mixed mode) > ' near index 37 > (?s).*?([0-9]+\.[0-9]+)(\.([0-9]+))?.* > ^ > [WARNING] Using the Java the version instead of, i.e. 0.0 > [WARNING] -quiet option is not supported on Java version < 1.4. Ignore > this option. > > > My question is should maven and every other project accept 9-ea as a > valid java.version string, or could build 100 plus tweak the > java.version string to something else that is considered valid. > In a recent mail to jigsaw-dev [1], Robert Scholte mentioned that the new version-string scheme may be problematic for some Maven plugins. He mentions the plexus-archiver specifically and that seems to have a patch already. If the maven-javadoc-plugin needs updates too then it's best to get a bug submitted so that it's on someone's radar. -Alan [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-December/005885.html From nhoj.patrick at gmail.com Sun Jan 3 09:01:20 2016 From: nhoj.patrick at gmail.com (John Patrick) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:01:20 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 ea 99 java.version In-Reply-To: <5688D726.6010506@oracle.com> References: <5688D726.6010506@oracle.com> Message-ID: cheers for the history Alan. I wasn't sure if 9-ea was going to be used purely during early access or if a new structure was going to be used. is their a source file, java doc or mail list message detailing the changes or new Java 9 setup. So I can reference that in any potential change I submit to open source projects? looking at the submitted patch, am I right to assume java.version going forward will be the purely a display string value and java.specification.version should be used to work out the major version number. Should I also assume their will be a java.implementation.version if you need to know the low level build number. Not sure if that patch fixes all the issue I'm seeing or not. I'll play around with it when I've next got a sleeping baby on my shoulder and see if I get any further. cheers, john Sent from my iPhone > On 3 Jan 2016, at 08:09, Alan Bateman wrote: > > >> On 02/01/2016 20:32, John Patrick wrote: >> evening, >> >> Does anyone know how to override the java.version field? >> >> Wanting to help out with getting JDK 9 ready, using it and building projects with it. >> >> Most patches I've submitted so far as simply bumping which is the min java version being used from 1.5 to 1.6. >> >> One issue that I can't figure a work around for java.version. I'm getting the following error from maven-javadoc-plugin. >> >> [WARNING] Unable to find the javadoc version: Unrecognized version of Javadoc: 'java version "9-ea" >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9-ea+99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc) >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9-ea+99-2015-12-23-184955.javare.4146.nc, mixed mode) >> ' near index 37 >> (?s).*?([0-9]+\.[0-9]+)(\.([0-9]+))?.* >> ^ >> [WARNING] Using the Java the version instead of, i.e. 0.0 >> [WARNING] -quiet option is not supported on Java version < 1.4. Ignore this option. >> >> >> My question is should maven and every other project accept 9-ea as a valid java.version string, or could build 100 plus tweak the java.version string to something else that is considered valid. > In a recent mail to jigsaw-dev [1], Robert Scholte mentioned that the new version-string scheme may be problematic for some Maven plugins. He mentions the plexus-archiver specifically and that seems to have a patch already. If the maven-javadoc-plugin needs updates too then it's best to get a bug submitted so that it's on someone's radar. > > -Alan > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-December/005885.html From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Sun Jan 3 09:12:50 2016 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:12:50 +0000 Subject: JDK 9 ea 99 java.version In-Reply-To: References: <5688D726.6010506@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5688E612.9010601@oracle.com> On 03/01/2016 09:01, John Patrick wrote: > cheers for the history Alan. > > I wasn't sure if 9-ea was going to be used purely during early access > or if a new structure was going to be used. > > is their a source file, java doc or mail list message detailing the > changes or new Java 9 setup. So I can reference that in any potential > change I submit to open source projects? > > looking at the submitted patch, am I right to assume java.version > going forward will be the purely a display string value and > java.specification.version should be used to work out the major > version number. Should I also assume their will be a > java.implementation.version if you need to know the low level build > number. > Best to start with JEP 223 [1]. I've no doubt that the Maven maintainers are aware of the changes, it just might take a while to address issues in code that parses the version string. -Alan [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 From martijnverburg at gmail.com Thu Jan 7 21:07:47 2016 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:07:47 +1300 Subject: Fwd: New JDK 9 feature: javadoc search box In-Reply-To: <568D8C21.4080108@oracle.com> References: <568D8C21.4080108@oracle.com> Message-ID: A fun one to share with your colleagues - please send feedback to jdk9dev! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *joe darcy* Date: Thursday, 7 January 2016 Subject: New JDK 9 feature: javadoc search box To: "jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net" Hello, FYI, towards the end of 2015 the javadoc team implemented an interesting new feature: a javadoc search box (JEP 225: Javadoc Search). If you look at the current JDK 9 javadoc http://download.java.net/jdk9/docs/api/index.html in the upper right corner of the main panel there now a search box. As an example, if you type "math" into the search box, this will look over the packages (java.math), types (java.langMath, java.math.BigDecimal, ...), and methods where "math" appears. Cheers, -Joe -- Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile) From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Wed Jan 13 09:54:28 2016 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:54:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 9 build 100 and JDK 8u76 b02 test results now available Message-ID: <3c41b8c0-9cb0-45f5-989c-e6cb48a108fc@default> JDK 9 ea build 100 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 32 differences from the build 99 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/99/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,371; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,924 1: /home/jtest/merge9/100/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,393; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,935 0 1 Test --- pass java/beans/XMLEncoder/javax_swing_JComponent.java --- pass java/nio/file/WatchService/UpdateInterference.java --- pass java/time/tck/java/time/format/TCKDTFParsedInstant.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegImageColorSpaceTest.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegMetadataColorSpaceTest.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/png/PngForceStopWritingTest.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/shared/WriteAfterAbort.java --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/tiff/WriteToSequenceAfterAbort.java --- pass javax/imageio/spi/MarkTryFinallyReproducer.java --- pass javax/management/MBeanServer/ExceptionTest.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanExceptionHandlingTest.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanInteropTest1.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanInteropTest2.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanLoadingTest1.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanNotifTest.java --- pass javax/management/mxbean/MXBeanWeirdParamTest.java --- pass javax/management/query/SupportedQueryTypesTest.java --- pass javax/management/security/AuthorizationTest.java --- pass javax/management/security/SecurityTest.java --- pass javax/net/ssl/TLSv12/SignatureAlgorithms.java pass --- javax/sound/midi/MidiDeviceProvider/FakeInfo.java pass --- javax/sound/midi/MidiDeviceProvider/NullInfo.java pass --- javax/sound/midi/MidiDeviceProvider/UnsupportedInfo.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/MidiDeviceProvider/ExpectedNPEOnNull.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/MidiDeviceProvider/FakeInfo.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/MidiDeviceProvider/UnsupportedInfo.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/MidiFileReader/ExpectedNPEOnNull.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/MidiFileWriter/ExpectedNPEOnNull.java --- pass javax/sound/midi/spi/SoundbankReader/ExpectedNPEOnNull.java --- pass jdk/nio/zipfs/MultiReleaseJarTest.java pass --- sun/misc/FloatingDecimal/TestFDBigInteger.java pass --- sun/misc/FloatingDecimal/TestFloatingDecimal.java 32 differences The hotspot test results contain 3 differences from the build 99 test results. There are 2 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/99/hotspot/JTwork pass: 1,000; fail: 4; error: 4; not run: 50 1: /home/jtest/merge9/100/hotspot/JTwork pass: 999; fail: 5; error: 4; not run: 50 0 1 Test fail pass compiler/compilercontrol/jcmd/StressAddMultiThreadedTest.java pass fail gc/TestNUMAPageSize.java pass fail runtime/CommandLine/OptionsValidation/TestOptionsWithRanges.java 3 differences The langtools test results contain 3 differences from the build 99 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/99/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,328; error: 1; not run: 49 1: /home/jtest/merge9/100/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,331; not run: 49 0 1 Test --- pass tools/javac/diags/DiagnosticRewriterTest.java --- pass tools/javac/diags/DiagnosticRewriterTest2.java error pass tools/javac/importscope/NegativeCyclicDependencyTest.java 3 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/100/emailable-report.html JDK 8u76 ea b02 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html No comparison data available for build b02 The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u76-b02/emailable-report.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India From rory.odonnell at oracle.com Fri Jan 15 10:39:14 2016 From: rory.odonnell at oracle.com (Rory O'Donnell) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:39:14 +0000 Subject: Early Access builds of JDK 8u76 b02, JDK 9 build b100 & build b99 for JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw are available on java.net Message-ID: <5698CC52.4020108@oracle.com> Hi All, Early Access b02 for JDK 8u76 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here . Early Access b100 for JDK 9 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here . Early Access b99 for JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here . Dalibor and I will be at FOSDEM '16, Brussels 30 & 31 January, link to our presentation here. Let us know if you will be there, hopefully we can meet up ! Rgds,Rory -- Rgds,Rory O'Donnell Quality Engineering Manager Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland From sadhak001 at gmail.com Sun Jan 17 23:31:31 2016 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:31:31 +0000 Subject: Fwd: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 13 January 2016 In-Reply-To: <000001523cbc8980-fcd462d2-cd2f-4a9e-b498-246affc90491-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> References: <000001523cbc8980-fcd462d2-cd2f-4a9e-b498-246affc90491-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Message-ID: FYI - enjoy the read. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Paper.li Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 at 20:45 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 13 January 2016 To: Adopt OpenJDK community news! News from the grass roots, developer lead community programme for OpenJDK. OpenJDK is the open source project that is Java, the language and the platform! Published by @adoptopenjdk 13 January 2016 Technology #java #android Today's headline Google's Move to OpenJDK to Benefit Developers [image: thumbnail] *www?.eweek?.com* - Google's Move to OpenJDK to Benefit Developers By Darryl K. Taft | Posted 2016-01-07 Print Google's switch of its Android code base to OpenJDK will benefit developers. But are... Advertisement Advertising is hard We do it all day. Let us teach you what we?ve learned. Learn how the experts market their startups. Grab the free ebook. 172 contributors - featured today: Read paper ? Email powered by [image: logo] If you have not requested this notification or wish not to receive paper notification updates in the future unsubscribe here . We are committed to protecting your privacy - more on our Privacy Policy . Smallrivers SA, Innovation Park EPFL, Building C, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2016:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From martijnverburg at gmail.com Mon Jan 18 05:15:01 2016 From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:15:01 +1300 Subject: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/ currently broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've cleared some disk space - jigsaw builds now also only hold on the the last 2 builds. Cheers, Martijn On 16 January 2016 at 11:17, Martin Buchholz wrote: > I was looking to grab a new jtreg binary from adopt-openjdk, and saw > at https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/ > > Your total DEV at Cloud disk usage is over your subscription's quota. > Your subscription 'foss-premium' allows 25 GB, but you are using 25874 > MB across all services (Forge and Jenkins). To fix this, you can > either upgrade your subscription or delete some data in your Forge > repositories, Jenkins workspaces or build artifacts. > > Thanks. > From martinrb at google.com Tue Jan 19 19:46:50 2016 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:46:50 -0800 Subject: https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/ currently broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks - fixed now! On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > I've cleared some disk space - jigsaw builds now also only hold on the the > last 2 builds. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On 16 January 2016 at 11:17, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >> I was looking to grab a new jtreg binary from adopt-openjdk, and saw >> at https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/ >> >> Your total DEV at Cloud disk usage is over your subscription's quota. >> Your subscription 'foss-premium' allows 25 GB, but you are using 25874 >> MB across all services (Forge and Jenkins). To fix this, you can >> either upgrade your subscription or delete some data in your Forge >> repositories, Jenkins workspaces or build artifacts. >> >> Thanks. > > From scolebourne at joda.org Tue Jan 19 21:08:38 2016 From: scolebourne at joda.org (Stephen Colebourne) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:08:38 +0000 Subject: Building Valhalla/JDK9 on Windows Message-ID: I have just tried building both Valhalla and JDK9 on Windows and failed with the following error during "bash configure": https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows bash configure --with-freetype-src=c:/apps/freetype ... checking if fixpath can be created... yes checking if fixpath.exe works... no Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.40219.01 for x64 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. fixpath.c c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c': No such file or directory configure: error: fixpath did not work! Using Babun shell Windows 7 Professional Have previously successfully compiled OpenJDK (not recently), so have freetype and compilers While it is possible that I might have out of date compilers/freetype, the error I'm getting doesn't seem related to anything out of date. Any suggestions? Stephen From lhochet at gmail.com Tue Jan 19 21:30:34 2016 From: lhochet at gmail.com (Ludovic HOCHET) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:30:34 +0100 Subject: Building Valhalla/JDK9 on Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Stephen, Try using the cygwin path way: bash configure --with-freetype-src=/cygdrive/c/apps/freetype This is what I use when building JDK9 [1]. [1] http://lhochet.blogspot.fr/2015/05/building-java-9-on-with-visual-studio.html On 19 January 2016 at 22:08, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > I have just tried building both Valhalla and JDK9 on Windows and failed > with the following error during "bash configure": > https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows > > bash configure --with-freetype-src=c:/apps/freetype > > ... > checking if fixpath can be created... yes > checking if fixpath.exe works... no > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.40219.01 for x64 > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > fixpath.c > c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c': > No such file or directory > configure: error: fixpath did not work! > > > Using Babun shell > Windows 7 Professional > Have previously successfully compiled OpenJDK (not recently), so have > freetype and compilers > > While it is possible that I might have out of date compilers/freetype, the > error I'm getting doesn't seem related to anything out of date. > > Any suggestions? > Stephen -- Ludovic ----------------------------------------- "Les formes qui differencient les etres importent peu si leur pensees s'unissent pour batir un univers..." Yoko Tsuno (in 'Les titans' by Roger Leloup) [The shapes that differenciate beings are not important if their thoughts unite to build a universe] From scolebourne at joda.org Tue Jan 19 21:41:13 2016 From: scolebourne at joda.org (Stephen Colebourne) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:41:13 +0000 Subject: Building Valhalla/JDK9 on Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I tried various combinations of freetype arguments. I just retried that one. No difference I'm afraid. Cannot open source file: 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c' Stephen On 19 January 2016 at 21:30, Ludovic HOCHET wrote: > Hello Stephen, > Try using the cygwin path way: > bash configure --with-freetype-src=/cygdrive/c/apps/freetype > > This is what I use when building JDK9 [1]. > > [1] > http://lhochet.blogspot.fr/2015/05/building-java-9-on-with-visual-studio.html > > On 19 January 2016 at 22:08, Stephen Colebourne > wrote: > > I have just tried building both Valhalla and JDK9 on Windows and failed > > with the following error during "bash configure": > > https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows > > > > bash configure --with-freetype-src=c:/apps/freetype > > > > ... > > checking if fixpath can be created... yes > > checking if fixpath.exe works... no > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.40219.01 for x64 > > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > > > fixpath.c > > c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > > > 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c': > > No such file or directory > > configure: error: fixpath did not work! > > > > > > Using Babun shell > > Windows 7 Professional > > Have previously successfully compiled OpenJDK (not recently), so have > > freetype and compilers > > > > While it is possible that I might have out of date compilers/freetype, > the > > error I'm getting doesn't seem related to anything out of date. > > > > Any suggestions? > > Stephen > > > > -- > Ludovic > ----------------------------------------- > > "Les formes qui differencient les etres importent peu > si leur pensees s'unissent pour batir un univers..." > Yoko Tsuno (in 'Les titans' by Roger Leloup) > [The shapes that differenciate beings are not important > if their thoughts unite to build a universe] > From volker.simonis at gmail.com Wed Jan 20 08:04:14 2016 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:04:14 +0100 Subject: Building Valhalla/JDK9 on Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stephen, maybe a dump question, but if you do 'dir c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c' in your cygwin shell, does it work? You could also run configure with the '--debug-configure' option. Maybe you get some more hints? Volker On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > I have just tried building both Valhalla and JDK9 on Windows and failed > with the following error during "bash configure": > https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows > > bash configure --with-freetype-src=c:/apps/freetype > > ... > checking if fixpath can be created... yes > checking if fixpath.exe works... no > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.40219.01 for x64 > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > fixpath.c > c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c': > No such file or directory > configure: error: fixpath did not work! > > > Using Babun shell > Windows 7 Professional > Have previously successfully compiled OpenJDK (not recently), so have > freetype and compilers > > While it is possible that I might have out of date compilers/freetype, the > error I'm getting doesn't seem related to anything out of date. > > Any suggestions? > Stephen From scolebourne at joda.org Wed Jan 20 13:09:01 2016 From: scolebourne at joda.org (Stephen Colebourne) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:09:01 +0000 Subject: Building Valhalla/JDK9 on Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've got it to work through two things. 1) hacking generated-configure.sh to hard code CURDIR: # Save the current directory this script was started from CURDIR="/cygdrive/c/dev/valhalla/valhalla" 2) moving the code from the E drive to the C drive, so that freetype, babun, cygwin and the code are all on the same drive (don't know if this was needed, as I did it before I tried step 1) While I can't say for sure, it seemed that once CURDIR was wrong, everything else failed to resolve correctly against that base. Note that CURDIR="/c/dev/valhalla/valhalla" did not work, it had to have the extra /cygwin. thanks for listening Stephen On 20 January 2016 at 08:04, Volker Simonis wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > maybe a dump question, but if you do 'dir > c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c' > in your cygwin shell, does it work? > > You could also run configure with the '--debug-configure' option. > Maybe you get some more hints? > > Volker > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Stephen Colebourne > wrote: > > I have just tried building both Valhalla and JDK9 on Windows and failed > > with the following error during "bash configure": > > https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows > > > > bash configure --with-freetype-src=c:/apps/freetype > > > > ... > > checking if fixpath can be created... yes > > checking if fixpath.exe works... no > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.40219.01 for x64 > > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > > > fixpath.c > > c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > > > 'c:/Users/stephen/.babun/cygwin/e/dev/valhalla/jdk9/common/src/fixpath.c': > > No such file or directory > > configure: error: fixpath did not work! > > > > > > Using Babun shell > > Windows 7 Professional > > Have previously successfully compiled OpenJDK (not recently), so have > > freetype and compilers > > > > While it is possible that I might have out of date compilers/freetype, > the > > error I'm getting doesn't seem related to anything out of date. > > > > Any suggestions? > > Stephen > From sadhak001 at gmail.com Wed Jan 20 22:32:15 2016 From: sadhak001 at gmail.com (Mani Sarkar) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:32:15 +0000 Subject: Fwd: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 20 January 2016 In-Reply-To: <0000015260c9179c-56176adb-ebf2-4cc9-b607-7e5bd6d2b4dd-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> References: <0000015260c9179c-56176adb-ebf2-4cc9-b607-7e5bd6d2b4dd-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Message-ID: Enjoy the read! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Paper.li Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 20:45 Subject: Adopt OpenJDK community news! is out! Edition of 20 January 2016 To: Adopt OpenJDK community news! News from the grass roots, developer lead community programme for OpenJDK. OpenJDK is the open source project that is Java, the language and the platform! Published by @adoptopenjdk 20 January 2016 Technology #java #android Today's headline Find a Tech Job In London [image: thumbnail] *www?.meetup?.com* - Come one, come all and join us for the FAJIL festive un-party. We will be kicking off the New Year and celebrating that we have passed the 3000 member mark!!! It will be on the 21st January at the ... Advertisement Advertising is hard We do it all day. Let us teach you what we?ve learned. Learn how the experts market their startups. Grab the free ebook. 208 contributors - featured today: Read paper ? Email powered by [image: logo] If you have not requested this notification or wish not to receive paper notification updates in the future unsubscribe here . We are committed to protecting your privacy - more on our Privacy Policy . Smallrivers SA, Innovation Park EPFL, Building C, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland -- @theNeomatrix369 * | **Blog ** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector * | **Bitbucket * * | **Github * * | **LinkedIn * *Come to Devoxx UK 2016:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Thu Jan 21 07:08:32 2016 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:08:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 9 build 101 test results now available Message-ID: <6e009212-5161-4abb-8743-956fd697dd6a@default> JDK 9 ea build 101 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 6 differences from the build 100 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/100/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,393; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,935 1: /home/jtest/merge9/101/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,393; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,936 0 1 Test --- pass java/io/RandomAccessFile/FileLengthTest.java pass --- java/lang/ProcessHandle/JavaChild.java pass --- java/lang/ProcessHandle/ProcessUtil.java --- pass java/net/URLConnection/TIFFContentGuesser.java --- pass java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/StressNativeSignal.java pass --- sun/misc/VM/GetNanoTimeAdjustment.java 6 differences The hotspot test results contain 4 differences from the build 100 test results. There are 3 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/100/hotspot/JTwork pass: 999; fail: 5; error: 4; not run: 50 1: /home/jtest/merge9/101/hotspot/JTwork pass: 997; fail: 7; error: 4; not run: 50 0 1 Test pass fail compiler/compilercontrol/jcmd/StressAddMultiThreadedTest.java fail pass runtime/CommandLine/OptionsValidation/TestOptionsWithRanges.java pass fail runtime/SharedArchiveFile/SharedBaseAddress.java pass fail runtime/Thread/TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java 4 differences The langtools test results contain 1 difference from the build 100 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/100/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,331; not run: 49 1: /home/jtest/merge9/101/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,330; not run: 49 0 1 Test pass --- tools/javac/util/context/T7021650.java 1 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/101/emailable-report.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Mon Jan 25 17:49:08 2016 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:49:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 9 build 102 and JDK 8u76 b03 test results now available Message-ID: <117455a0-30e9-4a7d-a1ab-96a42b784b53@default> JDK 9 ea build 102 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/9/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 4 differences from the build 101 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/101/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,393; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,936 1: /home/jtest/merge9/102/jdk/JTwork pass: 5,397; fail: 8; error: 1; not run: 1,936 0 1 Test --- pass java/lang/invoke/8076596/Test8076596.java --- pass java/lang/invoke/8147078/Test8147078.java --- pass java/net/SocketOption/UnsupportedOptionsTest.java --- pass java/util/Locale/Bug8026766.java 4 differences The hotspot test results contain 3 differences from the build 101 test results. There is 1 testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/101/hotspot/JTwork pass: 997; fail: 7; error: 4; not run: 50 1: /home/jtest/merge9/102/hotspot/JTwork pass: 998; fail: 6; error: 4; not run: 50 0 1 Test fail pass compiler/compilercontrol/jcmd/StressAddMultiThreadedTest.java pass fail runtime/Thread/Fibonacci.java fail pass runtime/Thread/TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java 3 differences The langtools test results contain 20 differences from the build 101 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge9/101/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,330; not run: 49 1: /home/jtest/merge9/102/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,344; not run: 52 0 1 Test pass --- tools/javac/api/T6430241.java pass --- tools/javac/file/BootClassPathPrepend.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific15.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific16.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific17.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific18.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific19.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific20.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific21.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific22.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific23.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific24.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific25.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific26.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific27.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MostSpecific28.java --- pass tools/javac/lexer/JavaLexerTest.java pass --- tools/sjavac/ExclPattern.java --- pass tools/sjavac/HiddenFiles.java --- pass tools/sjavac/IncludeExcludePatterns.java 20 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/9/archives/102/emailable-report.html JDK 8u76 ea b03 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 17 differences from the build b02 test results. There is 1 testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b02/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,877; fail: 27; not run: 1,071 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,892; fail: 14; not run: 1,071 0 1 Test fail pass com/sun/awt/SecurityWarning/GetSizeShouldNotReturnZero.java fail pass com/sun/awt/Translucency/WindowOpacity.java fail pass com/sun/java/swing/plaf/windows/8016551/bug8016551.java pass fail demo/jvmti/mtrace/TraceJFrame.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/6380849/TestPropertyEditor.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestColorClass.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestColorClassJava.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestColorClassNull.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestColorClassValue.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestFontClass.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestFontClassJava.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestFontClassNull.java fail pass java/beans/PropertyEditor/TestFontClassValue.java fail pass java/beans/XMLEncoder/java_awt_ScrollPane.java fail pass javax/sound/midi/Devices/InitializationHang.java --- pass sun/security/provider/X509Factory/BadPem.java --- pass sun/security/provider/certpath/DisabledAlgorithms/CPBuilderWithMD5.java 17 differences The hotspot test results contain 2 differences from the build b02 test results. There are 2 testcase failures, these failures are under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b02/hotspot/JTwork pass: 643; fail: 40; error: 2; not run: 18 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/hotspot/JTwork pass: 643; fail: 42; error: 2; not run: 18 0 1 Test --- fail runtime/ErrorHandling/TestCrashOnOutOfMemoryError.java --- fail runtime/ErrorHandling/TestExitOnOutOfMemoryError.java 2 differences The langtools test results contain 6 differences from the build b02 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b02/langtools/jtreg/JTwork pass: 3,095; error: 3; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,097; error: 3; not run: 7 0 1 Test error pass tools/javac/T6294589.java pass error tools/javac/TryWithResources/InterruptedExceptionTest.java --- pass tools/javac/diags/DiagnosticRewriterTest.java --- pass tools/javac/diags/DiagnosticRewriterTest2.java error pass tools/javac/lambda/bridge/TestMetafactoryBridges.java pass error tools/javac/varargs/7043922/T7043922.java 6 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u76-b03/emailable-report.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India From abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com Wed Jan 27 13:42:24 2016 From: abdul.kolarkunnu at oracle.com (Muneer Kolarkunnu) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 05:42:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: JDK 8u76 b04 test results now available Message-ID: JDK 8u76 ea b04 test results are now available at http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/testresults/8/testresults.html The jdk test results contain 3 differences from the build b03 test results. There is 1 testcase failure, this failure is under investigation. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,892; fail: 14; not run: 1,071 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b04/jdk/JTwork pass: 4,893; fail: 15; not run: 1,071 0 1 Test --- pass javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegImageColorSpaceTest.java --- pass javax/management/remote/mandatory/connection/RMIConnectorLogAttributesTest.java pass fail sun/security/pkcs11/rsa/TestKeyPairGenerator.java 3 differences The hotspot test results contain 1 difference from the build b03 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/hotspot/JTwork pass: 643; fail: 42; error: 2; not run: 18 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b04/hotspot/JTwork pass: 644; fail: 41; error: 2; not run: 19 0 1 Test fail pass gc/g1/TestShrinkAuxiliaryData25.java 1 differences The langtools test results contain 10 differences from the build b03 test results. No new testcase failures found. 0: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b03/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,097; error: 3; not run: 7 1: /home/jtest/merge8/jdk8u76-b04/langtools/JTwork pass: 3,099; error: 4; not run: 7 0 1 Test error pass tools/javac/TryWithResources/InterruptedExceptionTest.java pass error tools/javac/lambda/BadLambdaExpr.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/MethodHandleInvokeTest.java pass error tools/javac/lambda/intersection/IntersectionTargetTypeTest.java --- pass tools/javac/lambda/methodReferenceExecution/MethodReferencePackagePrivateQualifier.java --- pass tools/javac/parser/8134007/T8134007.java pass error tools/javac/tree/TreePosTest.java pass error tools/javac/types/TestComparisons.java error pass tools/javac/varargs/6199075/T6199075.java error pass tools/javac/varargs/7043922/T7043922.java 10 differences The nashorn test result is available at http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/8/archives8/jdk8u76-b04/emailable-report.html -- Regards, Abdul Muneer Quality Engineer Oracle, Bangalore, India