Producing community binaries for OpenJDK
Chan, Sunny
Sunny.Chan at gs.com
Wed Mar 22 03:58:52 UTC 2017
George/Tim,
I am interested the process you use to import the openjdk hg repository into the AdoptOpenJDK/Openjdk-jdkx repository - who will be responsible for pushing the updates to the openjdk-jdux repository going forward? I look at the openjdk-build repository and cannot find the relevant code that does the polling from openjdk's hg
Thanks.
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:22:25 +0000
From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
To: "george.adams" <george.adams at uk.ibm.com>
Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net"
<adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>, OpenJDK Binary Gateway
<openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Producing community binaries for OpenJDK
Message-ID:
<CAP7YuARfnMnk6nMyN99tzjh==+v24-e-trYQ5s7=GH8XiRBqOA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi George/All,
I've submitted a PR for the nightly build README. LMK what you think in terms of it's tone and message. If we have a rough consensus then I can write up similar READMEs for the other repositories.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 17 March 2017 at 09:36, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The five repositories have been created and I've added the team George
> created as admins to all of them.
>
> @George I assume you'll be wanting jdk9 and jdk10 repos as well, let
> me know if you want me to create those.
>
> I guess we'll see what the first code drops look like and then
> re-organise from there.
>
> In the meantime I think Mani and I need to take a look at the
> Cloudbees situation. If there are any other Cloudbees/Jenkins experts
> then please let me know and I'll put a Hangout together to determine
> if Cloudbees is still viable or what requests we need to make of them.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 16 March 2017 at 19:07, george.adams <george.adams at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> thanks for adding our github ID's to the organization. I have gone
>> ahead and created a team so that our group can easily be CC'd in
>> issues and also makes repo permissions much easier. Could you go
>> ahead and create the repos requested by Tim and as we are unable to
>> transfer the repositories until we have contributor access to your
>> end too
>>
>> Thanks George
>>
>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 4:20:04 PM UTC, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Apologies for coming late to the thread. Totally happy with the
>>> AdoptOpenJDK github being used as a starting point. Please not e we
>>> also have an AdoptOpenJDK org at bitbucket if people just wanted to
>>> use hg (although it sounds like not)
>>>
>>> I think we call foo openjdk or adoptopendjk - I'm not too fussed
>>> although I think openjdk clearly states what it is, so:
>>>
>>> openjdk-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>> openjdk-build = build scripts
>>> openjdk-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>> openjdk-releases = location for releases
>>> openjdk-website = website source/host
>>>
>>> As it's the AdoptOpenJDK org it should be more than clear enough
>>> that this is a community enthusiasts effort but not an official
>>> openjdk.java.net effort (which may or may not come later).
>>>
>>> I can add various folks to the GitHub org and give them permissions
>>> to add repos.
>>>
>>> Please email me your (or their) github ids and lets get going.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 March 2017 at 14:59, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Realistically it will take me longer than 24hrs to submit the
>>> > internal paperwork for pushing the build scripts out, but I hope
>>> > to have that done approx. mid-week. I'm going to push our code to Git under ALv2.
>>> >
>>> > The repo names in the Git AdoptOpenJDK org don't seem to follow
>>> > any naming convention ;-) I'd like to end up with:
>>> > foo-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>> > foo-build = build scripts
>>> > foo-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>> > foo-releases = location for releases
>>> > foo-website = website source/host
>>> >
>>> > Suggestions for the 'foo' prefix welcome. We'd also need write
>>> > access in those too!
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Tim
>>> >
>>> > On 10/03/17 13:40, Ben Evans wrote:
>>> >> I haven't heard anyone expressing any reservations about moving
>>> >> Tim's repos to AdoptOpenJDK - so shall we give it another 24
>>> >> hours, see if anyone speaks up, and if we don't hear anything, just do it?
>>> >>
>>> >> Rough consensus and running code, and all that?
>>> >>
>>> >> Ben
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Burton
>>> >> <mi... at mycosystems.co.uk>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> Hi Tim,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I really like the sound of this, and moving your repos into
>>> >>> https
>>> > ://github.com/adoptopenjdk would be great. Just checked and I dont
>>> > have write perm on it but other AdoptOpenJDK folk do.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best Regards
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Mike Burton
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2017, at 12:26, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 09/03/17 17:43, Ben Evans wrote:
>>> >>>>> This sounds good to me - and I think it's the kind of thing
>>> >>>>> that Adopt would very much be interested in.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> That's good to hear.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> I'm looping in adoption-discuss, AdoptOpenJDK and Martijn, as
>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how many other folk are reading openjdk-binary.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm happy to narrow it down to whatever list(s) are the most
>>> >>>> appropriate once there is consensus on a home for this.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Adoption folk - what do we think? Does this fit under the
>>> >>>>> existing structure?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Tim - assuming that it does, what practical things can
>>> >>>>> AdoptOpenJDK do to help you?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Not much at this stage, just a friendly place to talk about
>>> >>>> such stuff, and agreement on a natural place to put the work in
>>> >>>> progress. Being able to move our repos into the AdoptOpenJDK
>>> >>>> org [1] would be nice.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1]
>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com
>>> >>>> _adoptopenjdk&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLx
>>> >>>> fZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuV
>>> >>>> g_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=AJfL0UneTC1qLA6oLOl5d6iXON
>>> >>>> oly0m11prt8xv6vPc&e=
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Regards,
>>> >>>> Tim
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ben
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Tim Ellison
>>> >>>>> <Tim_E... at uk.ibm.com>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>> I've now got some cycles for actually doing some build work
>>> >>>>>> around OpenJDK.
>>> >>>>>> There are a couple of colleagues here at IBM who can also
>>> >>>>>> contribute to the build process.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> It seems that the closest starting point for community
>>> >>>>>> build/test is the fine work that was done as part of the
>>> >>>>>> Adopt OpenJDK project; though it looks like that has been
>>> >>>>>> quiet for a while?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> So we have started "from scratch" this week and are writing
>>> >>>>>> some build scripts we'd like to move into the open and share
>>> >>>>>> with folks. It will start simple, building Linux x86_64 and
>>> >>>>>> rolling out to Mac, PPC, and Windows.
>>> >>>>>> Likewise starting with some JTReg testing, and building that
>>> >>>>>> out to more meaningful tests. We like Git, so it's currently
>>> >>>>>> housed in a private Git repo.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> The goal is to have a continuous integration system pulling
>>> >>>>>> from OpenJDK and producing community binaries that are built
>>> >>>>>> using a fully open build system, so everyone can validate how
>>> >>>>>> it was created, and the dependencies and patches that it
>>> >>>>>> includes, etc. Of course, the idea is that changes that are
>>> >>>>>> relevant to OpenJDK source end up back there; but there will
>>> >>>>>> always be build specific-files, and point-in-time patches
>>> >>>>>> required to produce a working binary.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> If there is enough flexibility at the Adopt OpenJDK project,
>>> >>>>>> I'd prefer to push the code there and continue working under
>>> >>>>>> that organization; but understand if that project would
>>> >>>>>> prefer we set up our own space elsewhere.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Just to be clear, I'm not proposing to open up IBM's Java
>>> >>>>>> build system (believe me, you wouldn't want to have that!);
>>> >>>>>> it's much simpler than that
>>> >>>>>> -- just a CI clone/build/test/publish cycle, and then see
>>> >>>>>> where things go from there.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>>> >>>>>> Tim
>>> >>>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> >>>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
>>> >>>>>> with number 741598.
>>> >>>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>>> >>>>>> Hampshire
>>> >>>>>> PO6 3AU
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> >>>>>> Google Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>> >>>>>> it, send an email to
>>> >>>>>> openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> >>>>>> openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_OFD8B8A2C3.73C69040-2DON802580DE.004DB23A-2D802580DE.00594BDE-2540notes.na.collabserv.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=-s4hed6Fxg4dUfSzfSzQhZGGZP7HDSEFkuSO7eIZE7w&e= .
>>> >>>>>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> > Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> > send an email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>> > To post to this group, send an email to openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>> > To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_bbecbb8d-2D7a59-2Dc2f2-2Da85b-2Dddb09d4a86fb-2540gmail.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=6_QBchkZU93SuhXvvdvX9OsckNMJKSUQQUKrIx8vSeI&e= .
>>> > For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_d547005b-2D3027-2D42bd-2Da90f-2Dbf09d25049b2-2540googlegroups.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=5Tm4LZZyVPEGyVCbQJpr3up9M_B2NwaaZMZcAnxG5ks&e= .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:20:29 +0000
From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
To: "george.adams" <george.adams at uk.ibm.com>
Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net"
<adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>, OpenJDK Binary Gateway
<openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Producing community binaries for OpenJDK
Message-ID:
<CAP7YuAQ70SvBaiU=cGeb_go_O+H55Be_2fOhMq9oRn=3fxQgNQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi all,
We've made a good chunk of progress on this. If anyone wants to join the Slack channel where the developers are currently co-ordinating then please send me a message directly.
There's a few bugs to iron out and some clearer wording to be added but we should have a version out for review in the next week or so.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 17 March 2017 at 13:22, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi George/All,
>
> I've submitted a PR for the nightly build README. LMK what you think
> in terms of it's tone and message. If we have a rough consensus then
> I can write up similar READMEs for the other repositories.
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 09:36, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The five repositories have been created and I've added the team
>> George created as admins to all of them.
>>
>> @George I assume you'll be wanting jdk9 and jdk10 repos as well, let
>> me know if you want me to create those.
>>
>> I guess we'll see what the first code drops look like and then
>> re-organise from there.
>>
>> In the meantime I think Mani and I need to take a look at the
>> Cloudbees situation. If there are any other Cloudbees/Jenkins
>> experts then please let me know and I'll put a Hangout together to
>> determine if Cloudbees is still viable or what requests we need to make of them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 16 March 2017 at 19:07, george.adams <george.adams at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> thanks for adding our github ID's to the organization. I have gone
>>> ahead and created a team so that our group can easily be CC'd in
>>> issues and also makes repo permissions much easier. Could you go
>>> ahead and create the repos requested by Tim and as we are unable to
>>> transfer the repositories until we have contributor access to your
>>> end too
>>>
>>> Thanks George
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 4:20:04 PM UTC, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for coming late to the thread. Totally happy with the
>>>> AdoptOpenJDK github being used as a starting point. Please not e
>>>> we also have an AdoptOpenJDK org at bitbucket if people just wanted
>>>> to use hg (although it sounds like not)
>>>>
>>>> I think we call foo openjdk or adoptopendjk - I'm not too fussed
>>>> although I think openjdk clearly states what it is, so:
>>>>
>>>> openjdk-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>>> openjdk-build = build scripts
>>>> openjdk-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>>> openjdk-releases = location for releases
>>>> openjdk-website = website source/host
>>>>
>>>> As it's the AdoptOpenJDK org it should be more than clear enough
>>>> that this is a community enthusiasts effort but not an official
>>>> openjdk.java.net effort (which may or may not come later).
>>>>
>>>> I can add various folks to the GitHub org and give them permissions
>>>> to add repos.
>>>>
>>>> Please email me your (or their) github ids and lets get going.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 March 2017 at 14:59, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Realistically it will take me longer than 24hrs to submit the
>>>> > internal paperwork for pushing the build scripts out, but I hope
>>>> > to have that done approx. mid-week. I'm going to push our code to Git under ALv2.
>>>> >
>>>> > The repo names in the Git AdoptOpenJDK org don't seem to follow
>>>> > any naming convention ;-) I'd like to end up with:
>>>> > foo-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>>> > foo-build = build scripts
>>>> > foo-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>>> > foo-releases = location for releases
>>>> > foo-website = website source/host
>>>> >
>>>> > Suggestions for the 'foo' prefix welcome. We'd also need write
>>>> > access in those too!
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Tim
>>>> >
>>>> > On 10/03/17 13:40, Ben Evans wrote:
>>>> >> I haven't heard anyone expressing any reservations about moving
>>>> >> Tim's repos to AdoptOpenJDK - so shall we give it another 24
>>>> >> hours, see if anyone speaks up, and if we don't hear anything, just do it?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Rough consensus and running code, and all that?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Ben
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Burton
>>>> >> <mi... at mycosystems.co.uk>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi Tim,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I really like the sound of this, and moving your repos into
>>>> >>> https
>>>> > ://github.com/adoptopenjdk would be great. Just checked and I
>>>> > dont have write perm on it but other AdoptOpenJDK folk do.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Best Regards
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Mike Burton
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2017, at 12:26, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On 09/03/17 17:43, Ben Evans wrote:
>>>> >>>>> This sounds good to me - and I think it's the kind of thing
>>>> >>>>> that Adopt would very much be interested in.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> That's good to hear.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> I'm looping in adoption-discuss, AdoptOpenJDK and Martijn, as
>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how many other folk are reading openjdk-binary.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I'm happy to narrow it down to whatever list(s) are the most
>>>> >>>> appropriate once there is consensus on a home for this.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> Adoption folk - what do we think? Does this fit under the
>>>> >>>>> existing structure?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Tim - assuming that it does, what practical things can
>>>> >>>>> AdoptOpenJDK do to help you?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Not much at this stage, just a friendly place to talk about
>>>> >>>> such stuff, and agreement on a natural place to put the work
>>>> >>>> in progress. Being able to move our repos into the
>>>> >>>> AdoptOpenJDK org [1] would be nice.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> [1]
>>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.co
>>>> >>>> m_adoptopenjdk&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPx
>>>> >>>> LxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7sa
>>>> >>>> UuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=AJfL0UneTC1qLA6oLOl5d6
>>>> >>>> iXONoly0m11prt8xv6vPc&e=
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Regards,
>>>> >>>> Tim
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> Thanks,
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Ben
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Tim Ellison
>>>> >>>>> <Tim_E... at uk.ibm.com>
>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> I've now got some cycles for actually doing some build work
>>>> >>>>>> around OpenJDK.
>>>> >>>>>> There are a couple of colleagues here at IBM who can also
>>>> >>>>>> contribute to the build process.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> It seems that the closest starting point for community
>>>> >>>>>> build/test is the fine work that was done as part of the
>>>> >>>>>> Adopt OpenJDK project; though it looks like that has been
>>>> >>>>>> quiet for a while?
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> So we have started "from scratch" this week and are writing
>>>> >>>>>> some build scripts we'd like to move into the open and share
>>>> >>>>>> with folks. It will start simple, building Linux x86_64 and
>>>> >>>>>> rolling out to Mac, PPC, and Windows.
>>>> >>>>>> Likewise starting with some JTReg testing, and building that
>>>> >>>>>> out to more meaningful tests. We like Git, so it's
>>>> >>>>>> currently housed in a private Git repo.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> The goal is to have a continuous integration system pulling
>>>> >>>>>> from OpenJDK and producing community binaries that are built
>>>> >>>>>> using a fully open build system, so everyone can validate
>>>> >>>>>> how it was created, and the dependencies and patches that it
>>>> >>>>>> includes, etc. Of course, the idea is that changes that are
>>>> >>>>>> relevant to OpenJDK source end up back there; but there will
>>>> >>>>>> always be build specific-files, and point-in-time patches
>>>> >>>>>> required to produce a working binary.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> If there is enough flexibility at the Adopt OpenJDK project,
>>>> >>>>>> I'd prefer to push the code there and continue working under
>>>> >>>>>> that organization; but understand if that project would
>>>> >>>>>> prefer we set up our own space elsewhere.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Just to be clear, I'm not proposing to open up IBM's Java
>>>> >>>>>> build system (believe me, you wouldn't want to have that!);
>>>> >>>>>> it's much simpler than that
>>>> >>>>>> -- just a CI clone/build/test/publish cycle, and then see
>>>> >>>>>> where things go from there.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> >>>>>> Tim
>>>> >>>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> >>>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
>>>> >>>>>> with number 741598.
>>>> >>>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>>>> >>>>>> Hampshire
>>>> >>>>>> PO6 3AU
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> --
>>>> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>> >>>>>> Google Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>>> >>>>>> from it, send an email to
>>>> >>>>>> openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> >>>>>> openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_OFD8B8A2C3.73C69040-2DON802580DE.004DB23A-2D802580DE.00594BDE-2540notes.na.collabserv.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=-s4hed6Fxg4dUfSzfSzQhZGGZP7HDSEFkuSO7eIZE7w&e= .
>>>> >>>>>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>> > Google Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>> > send an email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>> > To post to this group, send an email to openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>>> > To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_bbecbb8d-2D7a59-2Dc2f2-2Da85b-2Dddb09d4a86fb-2540gmail.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=6_QBchkZU93SuhXvvdvX9OsckNMJKSUQQUKrIx8vSeI&e= .
>>>> > For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_d547005b-2D3027-2D42bd-2Da90f-2Dbf09d25049b2-2540googlegroups.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=5Tm4LZZyVPEGyVCbQJpr3up9M_B2NwaaZMZcAnxG5ks&e= .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:26:28 +0100
From: Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>
To: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>
Cc: "adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net"
<adoption-discuss at openjdk.java.net>, "george.adams"
<george.adams at uk.ibm.com>, OpenJDK Binary Gateway
<openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Producing community binaries for OpenJDK
Message-ID:
<CAGUMyaQ+yQe3mFuRYRKZm4mRB8ZBZNh=C26cHift-txKZ-ctrg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi Martijn,
I'm still a bit confused what this project is trying to do, can you (or someone else) write a quick summary?
Also, perhaps Slack is convenient, but it feels a bit hidden (click through, pm to obtain secrets links, etc...). If this work is producing something that is useful for the OpenJDK community then perhaps the discussion should happen in the open, or at least backed by a wiki page or something?
Cheers,
Mario
2017-03-21 22:20 GMT+01:00 Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> We've made a good chunk of progress on this. If anyone wants to join
> the Slack channel where the developers are currently co-ordinating
> then please send me a message directly.
>
> There's a few bugs to iron out and some clearer wording to be added
> but we should have a version out for review in the next week or so.
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 13:22, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi George/All,
>>
>> I've submitted a PR for the nightly build README. LMK what you think
>> in terms of it's tone and message. If we have a rough consensus then
>> I can write up similar READMEs for the other repositories.
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>>
>> On 17 March 2017 at 09:36, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The five repositories have been created and I've added the team
>>> George created as admins to all of them.
>>>
>>> @George I assume you'll be wanting jdk9 and jdk10 repos as well, let
>>> me know if you want me to create those.
>>>
>>> I guess we'll see what the first code drops look like and then
>>> re-organise from there.
>>>
>>> In the meantime I think Mani and I need to take a look at the
>>> Cloudbees situation. If there are any other Cloudbees/Jenkins
>>> experts then please let me know and I'll put a Hangout together to
>>> determine if Cloudbees is still viable or what requests we need to make of them.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>> On 16 March 2017 at 19:07, george.adams <george.adams at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for adding our github ID's to the organization. I have gone
>>>> ahead and created a team so that our group can easily be CC'd in
>>>> issues and also makes repo permissions much easier. Could you go
>>>> ahead and create the repos requested by Tim and as we are unable to
>>>> transfer the repositories until we have contributor access to your
>>>> end too
>>>>
>>>> Thanks George
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 4:20:04 PM UTC, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies for coming late to the thread. Totally happy with the
>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK github being used as a starting point. Please not e
>>>>> we also have an AdoptOpenJDK org at bitbucket if people just
>>>>> wanted to use hg (although it sounds like not)
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we call foo openjdk or adoptopendjk - I'm not too fussed
>>>>> although I think openjdk clearly states what it is, so:
>>>>>
>>>>> openjdk-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>>>> openjdk-build = build scripts
>>>>> openjdk-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>>>> openjdk-releases = location for releases
>>>>> openjdk-website = website source/host
>>>>>
>>>>> As it's the AdoptOpenJDK org it should be more than clear enough
>>>>> that this is a community enthusiasts effort but not an official
>>>>> openjdk.java.net effort (which may or may not come later).
>>>>>
>>>>> I can add various folks to the GitHub org and give them
>>>>> permissions to add repos.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please email me your (or their) github ids and lets get going.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 March 2017 at 14:59, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Realistically it will take me longer than 24hrs to submit the
>>>>> > internal paperwork for pushing the build scripts out, but I hope
>>>>> > to have that done approx. mid-week. I'm going to push our code to Git under ALv2.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The repo names in the Git AdoptOpenJDK org don't seem to follow
>>>>> > any naming convention ;-) I'd like to end up with:
>>>>> > foo-jdk8u = openjdk source mirror
>>>>> > foo-build = build scripts
>>>>> > foo-nightly = location of nightly builds
>>>>> > foo-releases = location for releases
>>>>> > foo-website = website source/host
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Suggestions for the 'foo' prefix welcome. We'd also need write
>>>>> > access in those too!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Tim
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 10/03/17 13:40, Ben Evans wrote:
>>>>> >> I haven't heard anyone expressing any reservations about moving
>>>>> >> Tim's repos to AdoptOpenJDK - so shall we give it another 24
>>>>> >> hours, see if anyone speaks up, and if we don't hear anything, just do it?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Rough consensus and running code, and all that?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Ben
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Burton
>>>>> >> <mi... at mycosystems.co.uk>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>> Hi Tim,
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I really like the sound of this, and moving your repos into
>>>>> >>> https
>>>>> > ://github.com/adoptopenjdk would be great. Just checked and I
>>>>> > dont have write perm on it but other AdoptOpenJDK folk do.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Best Regards
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Mike Burton
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2017, at 12:26, Tim Ellison <t.p.e... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On 09/03/17 17:43, Ben Evans wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> This sounds good to me - and I think it's the kind of thing
>>>>> >>>>> that Adopt would very much be interested in.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> That's good to hear.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> I'm looping in adoption-discuss, AdoptOpenJDK and Martijn,
>>>>> >>>>> as I'm not sure how many other folk are reading
>>>>> >>>>> openjdk-binary.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> I'm happy to narrow it down to whatever list(s) are the most
>>>>> >>>> appropriate once there is consensus on a home for this.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Adoption folk - what do we think? Does this fit under the
>>>>> >>>>> existing structure?
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Tim - assuming that it does, what practical things can
>>>>> >>>>> AdoptOpenJDK do to help you?
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Not much at this stage, just a friendly place to talk about
>>>>> >>>> such stuff, and agreement on a natural place to put the work
>>>>> >>>> in progress. Being able to move our repos into the
>>>>> >>>> AdoptOpenJDK org [1] would be nice.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> [1]
>>>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.c
>>>>> >>>> om_adoptopenjdk&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOY
>>>>> >>>> PxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F
>>>>> >>>> 7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=AJfL0UneTC1qLA6oLO
>>>>> >>>> l5d6iXONoly0m11prt8xv6vPc&e=
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Regards,
>>>>> >>>> Tim
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Ben
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Tim Ellison
>>>>> >>>>> <Tim_E... at uk.ibm.com>
>>>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>> I've now got some cycles for actually doing some build work
>>>>> >>>>>> around OpenJDK.
>>>>> >>>>>> There are a couple of colleagues here at IBM who can also
>>>>> >>>>>> contribute to the build process.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> It seems that the closest starting point for community
>>>>> >>>>>> build/test is the fine work that was done as part of the
>>>>> >>>>>> Adopt OpenJDK project; though it looks like that has been
>>>>> >>>>>> quiet for a while?
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> So we have started "from scratch" this week and are writing
>>>>> >>>>>> some build scripts we'd like to move into the open and
>>>>> >>>>>> share with folks. It will start simple, building Linux
>>>>> >>>>>> x86_64 and rolling out to Mac, PPC, and Windows.
>>>>> >>>>>> Likewise starting with some JTReg testing, and building
>>>>> >>>>>> that out to more meaningful tests. We like Git, so it's
>>>>> >>>>>> currently housed in a private Git repo.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> The goal is to have a continuous integration system pulling
>>>>> >>>>>> from OpenJDK and producing community binaries that are
>>>>> >>>>>> built using a fully open build system, so everyone can
>>>>> >>>>>> validate how it was created, and the dependencies and
>>>>> >>>>>> patches that it includes, etc. Of course, the idea is that
>>>>> >>>>>> changes that are relevant to OpenJDK source end up back
>>>>> >>>>>> there; but there will always be build specific-files, and
>>>>> >>>>>> point-in-time patches required to produce a working binary.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> If there is enough flexibility at the Adopt OpenJDK
>>>>> >>>>>> project, I'd prefer to push the code there and continue
>>>>> >>>>>> working under that organization; but understand if that
>>>>> >>>>>> project would prefer we set up our own space elsewhere.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Just to be clear, I'm not proposing to open up IBM's Java
>>>>> >>>>>> build system (believe me, you wouldn't want to have that!);
>>>>> >>>>>> it's much simpler than that
>>>>> >>>>>> -- just a CI clone/build/test/publish cycle, and then see
>>>>> >>>>>> where things go from there.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> >>>>>> Tim
>>>>> >>>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>>> >>>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>>>>> >>>>>> number
>>>>> >>>>>> 741598.
>>>>> >>>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
>>>>> >>>>>> PO6 3AU
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> >>>>>> Groups
>>>>> >>>>>> "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>> >>>>>> send an
>>>>> >>>>>> email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>> >>>>>> openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_OFD8B8A2C3.73C69040-2DON802580DE.004DB23A-2D802580DE.00594BDE-2540notes.na.collabserv.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=-s4hed6Fxg4dUfSzfSzQhZGGZP7HDSEFkuSO7eIZE7w&e= .
>>>>> >>>>>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> > Groups "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> > an email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> > To post to this group, send an email to openjdk-bin... at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> > To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_bbecbb8d-2D7a59-2Dc2f2-2Da85b-2Dddb09d4a86fb-2540gmail.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=6_QBchkZU93SuhXvvdvX9OsckNMJKSUQQUKrIx8vSeI&e= .
>>>>> > For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "OpenJDK Binary Gateway" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>> email to openjdk-binary-gateway+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> openjdk-binary-gateway at googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_openjdk-2Dbinary-2Dgateway_d547005b-2D3027-2D42bd-2Da90f-2Dbf09d25049b2-2540googlegroups.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=5Tm4LZZyVPEGyVCbQJpr3up9M_B2NwaaZMZcAnxG5ks&e= .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=8AQF2sgu5icT8uYqG7vnmGYsorAF308oe_skE3C9uqI&e= .
--
pgp key: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__subkeys.pgp.net_&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=pQbjL8uRYJoDj0iugCqb5ZYxfhu1J2ztAtf0AmnoUVM&e= PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
Java Champion - Blog: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neugens.wordpress.com&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=FbmsnEEU-MW4jn0ew_-3wyBr2-UlgFlpfFj62RveJzY&e= - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.classpath.org_&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=IrC2nFH_Xt3uGqjqhyNOEXQBm8X67Cn-2qFQGDnp1lo&e=
OpenJDK: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__openjdk.java.net_projects_caciocavallo_&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=WIGDLC3yswSNZb9mlKZM3vFjRKR8PIouGSDVdygabR8&e=
Please, support open standards:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__endsoftpatents.org_&d=DgICAg&c=7563p3e2zaQw0AB1wrFVgyagb2IE5rTZOYPxLxfZlX4&r=e-nMYEAYoRWWms8SM-H97SgyQYsz-xaiLmQPYwZ3m5E&m=B1F7saUuVg_TOSLru3OGqEs7StOtjYndLiMFskMhB2M&s=m-20OSucjJ5U221PbTmrIX6BsrfrcYWmU1JPXzpyn_0&e=
End of adoption-discuss Digest, Vol 39, Issue 10
************************************************
More information about the adoption-discuss
mailing list