[condy-folding] Condy CP entries deduplication?

[Vicente Romero]

yes it is, I will fix it

Vicente

On 10/17/2017 01:31 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> This is an implementation bug; these should be merged in Gen when we 
> are writing out the constant pool.
>
> On 10/16/2017 6:33 AM, Tagir Valeev wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Still playing with condy. Very simple program:
>>
>> import java.lang.invoke.*;
>>
>> public class Condy {
>>    public static void main(String[] args) {
>>      Object o1 = Intrinsics.ldc(ConstantRef.ofNull());
>>      Object o2 = Intrinsics.ldc(ConstantRef.ofNull());
>>    }
>> }
>>
>> I thought that only one CP entry will be created for both dynamic
>> constants, however in fact two separate entries are created, despite
>> they refer to the same NameAndType and the same BSM:
>>
>> $ javac -XDdoConstantFold Condy.java
>> $ javap -v Condy
>> ...
>> public class Condy
>> ...
>> Constant pool:
>>     #1 = Methodref          #5.#14         // 
>> java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
>>     #2 = ConstantDynamic    #0:#17         // #0:_:Ljava/lang/Object;
>>     #3 = ConstantDynamic    #0:#17         // #0:_:Ljava/lang/Object;
>> ...
>> {
>> ...
>>    public static void main(java.lang.String[]);
>>      descriptor: ([Ljava/lang/String;)V
>>      flags: (0x0009) ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC
>>      Code:
>>        stack=1, locals=3, args_size=1
>>           0: ldc           #2                  // ConstantDynamic
>> #0:_:Ljava/lang/Object;
>>           2: astore_1
>>           3: ldc           #3                  // ConstantDynamic
>> #0:_:Ljava/lang/Object;
>>           5: astore_2
>>           6: return
>>        LineNumberTable:
>>          line 5: 0
>>          line 6: 3
>>          line 7: 6
>> }
>> ...
>> BootstrapMethods:
>>    0: #16 REF_invokeStatic
>> java/lang/invoke/Bootstraps.defaultValue:(Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandles$Lookup;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Class;)Ljava/lang/Object; 
>>
>>      Method arguments:
>>
>> Is this intended behavior or implementation bug? If I remember
>> correctly, discussions regarding this topic ended in merging equal CP
>> entries, but probably I'm missing something.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tagir Valeev.
>