(Condy) Folded of local variables are still considered when calculating the max number of local vars of a method
Remi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Sun Sep 2 17:58:06 UTC 2018
Hi all,
while trying to reproduce a bug in ASM using the constant API + Intrinsics.ldc, i've spot a discrepancy,
using the follwing example,
package jdk12;
import java.lang.constant.ClassDesc;
import java.lang.constant.DirectMethodHandleDesc.Kind;
import java.lang.constant.DynamicConstantDesc;
import java.lang.constant.MethodHandleDesc;
import java.lang.constant.MethodTypeDesc;
import java.lang.invoke.Intrinsics;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup;
public class ConstantDynamicExample {
public static long primitiveExample() {
MethodTypeDesc methodDescriptor = MethodTypeDesc.ofDescriptor("(Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandles$Lookup;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Class;)J");
DynamicConstantDesc<Long> dynamicConstant = DynamicConstantDesc.of(
MethodHandleDesc.of(Kind.STATIC, ClassDesc.of("jdk12.ConstantDynamicExample"), "bsm", methodDescriptor));
return Intrinsics.ldc(dynamicConstant);
}
private static long bsm(Lookup lookup, String name, Class<?> type) {
return 3L;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(primitiveExample());
}
}
Using javap, you can see that the dynamicConstant is folded but the number of local variable (locals=2) still count the variables that doesn't exist anymore
public static long primitiveExample();
descriptor: ()J
flags: (0x0009) ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC
Code:
stack=2, locals=2, args_size=0
0: ldc2_w #2 // Dynamic #0:_:J
3: lreturn
LineNumberTable:
line 43: 0
regards,
Rémi
More information about the amber-dev
mailing list