String::format benchmark results
Vicente Romero
vicente.romero at oracle.com
Wed Mar 27 02:40:18 UTC 2019
This version [1] includes two new tables for floats, the numbers are not
so great for them. There was also a SOE during execution of test
testFormat0080float0080String, see last row of `Table 7`, that's why
there is no information in the last half of the table. I will
investigate the reason for the error,
Vicente
[1]
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/string_format_benchmark_results/v3/benchmarkResults_intrinsics_string_format_v3.html
On 3/26/19 3:01 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have published another version [1], same benchmark, same builds,
> this one include the standard errors of the measurements. The
> variability of some of the data is significantly large (46% in one case)
>
> Thanks,
> Vicente
>
> [1]
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/string_format_benchmark_results/v2/benchmarkResults_intrinsics_string_format_v2.html
>
> On 3/25/19 6:06 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It seems like I overwrote the benchmark for String::format, thanks
>> Alex, please check the results at [1]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vicente
>>
>> [1]
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/string_format_benchmark_results/v1/benchmarkResults_intrinsics_string_format_v1.html
>
More information about the amber-dev
mailing list