RFR: CSR for Compiler implementation for records

[Alex Buckley]

Usually, I want a CSR's Solution to break down the new language feature 
-- for example, see the original CSR for switch expressions JDK-8207241, 
where the Solution sketches the actual changes, not just "allow switch 
as an expression kthxbai". However, in the case of record classes, the 
Solution is legitimately self-contained -- support record classes! -- so 
no need for a break-down. That said, the phrase "for a fixed set of 
values" is confusing because it suggests enum-like behavior (the same 
phrase in the Summary is not confusing because it has a qualifier). Also 
"Add records classes".

Alex

On 11/3/2019 9:13 AM, Vicente Romero wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please review the draft of the CSR for Compiler implementation for 
> records at [1]
> 
> Thanks,
> Vicente
> 
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233433