RFR: JEP 359-Records: javadoc code

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Tue Nov 5 21:35:18 UTC 2019


I've posted another small webrev, containing review feedback from Hannes 
and Kumar.

In addition, while reading the reviews, I noticed that there were some 
obsolete references to sealed types in one method. I've removed those 
references and simplified the code.

-- Jon

Full webrev against jdk/jdk:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/amber-records/webrev.02.default/

Incremental webrev against amber/records:tip:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jjg/amber-records/webrev.02.tip/


On 10/17/2019 12:43 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the javadoc code for JEP 359 (Records), this webrev 
> contains only the javadoc code as we have decided to split the new 
> code in clusters to make the review process easier.
>
> Thanks in advance for the feedback,
> Vicente
>
> PS, Jon is the author of this code please keep him in the loop
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/records.review/javadoc/webrev.00/



More information about the amber-dev mailing list