state of the branch sealed-and-record ?

[Mark Raynsford]

On 2019-10-20T10:08:52 -0400
Vicente Romero <vicente.romero at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Remi,
> 
> A new branch named `records` was created which contains only the records 
> code. The former records-and-sealed branch should contain only the 
> sealed code but as it depends on the record branch, from the user 
> perspective will continue to have the code of both projects. It could 
> happen though that the automatic merge can't figure out what to do at 
> some point an as a result the records-and-sealed branch could be broken 
> we will try to keep it working but it could fall off the cliff from time 
> to time,

Hello!

I'm about to try doing an experimental rewrite of a small documentation
language compiler I have using both sealed types and records. To
clarify: Which branch should I be using?

-- 
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com