Feedback for records: Accessors name() vs. getName()

[Brian Goetz]

Just because there was recent discussion on this, here's a link to the 
recent PR for adding records support to Jackson:

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/2714/commits/20684d773c09fb09e5c7a013e2479ab1edc43e78

While there's lots of frameworks out there, I think this illustrates 
that the cost here is not that high, as long as the package is 
maintained (and if it isn't, should you really be using it?)  By the 
time records are finalized, we expect many of the frameworks will 
already support them.

On 8/5/2020 8:51 AM, Kamil Ševeček wrote:
> 5. All libraries will have to be adapted
> ----------------------------------------
> There are a lot of libraries that depend on the get/set convention and you
> would prevent their usage for records. Such as BeanTableModel (swing
> TableModel implementation), Jackson JSON parser and many others.