Package Private Record Fields

[Brian Goetz]

> Doesn't this violate the "transparent holders" part of records, and 
> therefore mean that you are trying to use records for something it 
> isn't designed for?

And, by the way, you have drifted far from the charter of this list, 
which explicitly does not include "arguing about language design." It 
was fair for August to ask his "why not" question, and he got his 
answer.  (And the more constructively the question is asked, the more 
latitude is given when something nudges up against the line.)