Loosening requirements for super() invocation

[Archie Cobbs]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:22 PM Vicente Romero <vicente.romero at oracle.com>
wrote:

>
> On 1/5/23 14:20, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:06 PM Vicente Romero <vicente.romero at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> yep I've been reviewing other PRs you have been working on, this one is
>> also in my list,
>>
>
> Just to be clear, there aren't PR's filed yet for the 'this' escape work,
> or for the related work allowing code before super(). Just let me know
> if/when I should do that.
>
>
> I saw a fork with some related code but feel free to condense the work in
> a formal PR
>

OK great - thanks.

For the 'this' escape, it looks like the following JDK bugs would be fixed,
so I'll plan to file the PR under one of these:

    JDK-8015831 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8015831>
    JDK-6557145 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6557145>

FWIW, the following bugs are related, but not (necessarily) fixed:

    JDK-6563146 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6563146>
    JDK-8091094 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8091094>

For the code before super() work (JDK-8194743
<https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8194743>), is it OK to file a PR
before there is a JEP?

-Archie

-- 
Archie L. Cobbs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20230105/ff5b4604/attachment.htm>