New candidate JEP: 441: Pattern Matching for switch

[David Alayachew]

Hello Brian,

> When a JEP for a preview feature goes
> final, its job is to describe the feature
> being shipped, not the historical arc.
> Putting something about a feature we
> didn't ultimately add would merely be
> confusing.

Fair enough. My comment would likely have been relevant back when
parenthesized patterns were on the table. In that case, I understand and
agree.

Thank you for your time!
David Alayachew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20230318/3a2a5eac/attachment.htm>