Bug: Compact record constructor is missing generic type info on parameters

[Patrick Doyle]

Hi all,

Is this the wrong place to report bugs like this? What would be the right
place?

Thanks,
--
Patrick Doyle
p.r.doyle at gmail.com


On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:52 AM Patrick Doyle <p.r.doyle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a JUnit5 test case that demonstrates that if you use the compact
> constructor syntax in a record, the reflection info will be missing generic
> type information. Implicit constructors work fine, as do explicit canonical
> constructors.
>
> I found this on Temurin 21.0.2 and the Adoptium project suggested I post
> here.
>
> The unit test can be found in the Adoptium bug report:
> https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium-support/issues/1025
>
> Let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Patrick Doyle
> p.r.doyle at gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20240423/1e8cb9cc/attachment.htm>