JDK-8300691 - final variables in for loop headers should accept updates

[David Alayachew]

Thanks for clarifying Brian.

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:23 PM Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> To my understanding, the other mailing list is when they want an exclusive
> chat, whereas amber-dev is a free-for-all.
>
>
> I'd like to correct this perception, because amber-dev is definitely not
> intended to be any sort of free-for-all.
>
> The charter of amber-dev is discussion pertaining to the _implementation_
> of Amber features.  This includes implementation discussions, bug reports,
> "is this how it is supposed to work" questions, experience reports ("I
> tried it and ___").  It is definitely and explicitly *not* a place for
> language design discussion, nor a place for "I have an idea for amber".
>
> That said, in the interest of inclusion and helpfulness, we are often
> tolerant of certain _limited_ discussions outside the charter.  We try to
> allow discussions to continue until they have clearly wandered out of
> bounds, but we also hope that people exercise restraint so that we can
> continue to do so.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20241217/d0389916/attachment.htm>