JDK-8300691 - final variables in for loop headers should accept updates

[Archie Cobbs]

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:00 PM Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb9n at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Being under the impression that user-facing language-change decisions
> should be discussed in amber-spec-experts, I asked Archie to put a thread
> there as well.
>
> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2024-December/004229.html
>

We didn't get a strong enough positive response on amber-spec-experts
(actually, we got no response :) so I'll shelve this idea for now.

Thanks for all the discussion - it has revealed (yet again) how there is a
lot of subtlety to even very minor language changes!

-Archie

-- 
Archie L. Cobbs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20241219/ee2a7ca2/attachment-0001.htm>