Fwd: Feedback about StableValues(Preview)

david Grajales david.1993grajales at gmail.com
Mon Sep 22 13:40:00 UTC 2025


Hi maurizio.

I have considered one particular case but not one I would use a lot tho.

When you are developing some UI or frontend like content and you have a
view that requires the loading from multiple external sources (for example
weather information and maps information) doing from a list of tasks lazily
may be helpful. Not something I would use i my day by day work, I am mostly
a pure server side developer (mostly backend and IoT); haven't done
anything related to UI recently.



El lun, 22 sept 2025 a la(s) 7:25 a.m., Maurizio Cimadamore (
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com) escribió:

> Picking up on this old thread again
>
> On 03/09/2025 00:54, david Grajales wrote:
> > So, in short the stable values are not mean for very dynamic scenarios
> > because the API prioritize performance and efficiency at runtime and
> > sacrifices flexibility in exchange; which translates as " the keys or
> > at least the size of the stableValue must be know at compile time".
>
> Asking more directly -- could you see cases where specifying just a size
> (instead of the full set of keys) could be more flexible in some of the
> use cases you have considered?
>
> Maurizio
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20250922/5a8c7e2c/attachment.htm>


More information about the amber-dev mailing list