Fwd: Feedback about StableValues(Preview)

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

Thanks,
and, to clarify -- I meant usage of a map whose keys/values are computed 
lazily, but whose max size is fixed.

Maurizio

On 22/09/2025 14:40, david Grajales wrote:
> Hi maurizio.
>
> I have considered one particular case but not one I would use a lot tho.
>
> When you are developing some UI or frontend like content and you have 
> a view that requires the loading from multiple external sources (for 
> example weather information and maps information) doing from a list of 
> tasks lazily may be helpful. Not something I would use i my day by day 
> work, I am mostly a pure server side developer (mostly backend and 
> IoT); haven't done anything related to UI recently.
>
>
>
> El lun, 22 sept 2025 a la(s) 7:25 a.m., Maurizio Cimadamore 
> (maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com) escribió:
>
>     Picking up on this old thread again
>
>     On 03/09/2025 00:54, david Grajales wrote:
>     > So, in short the stable values are not mean for very dynamic
>     scenarios
>     > because the API prioritize performance and efficiency at runtime
>     and
>     > sacrifices flexibility in exchange; which translates as " the
>     keys or
>     > at least the size of the stableValue must be know at compile time".
>
>     Asking more directly -- could you see cases where specifying just
>     a size
>     (instead of the full set of keys) could be more flexible in some
>     of the
>     use cases you have considered?
>
>     Maurizio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/amber-dev/attachments/20250922/8b8eb1d1/attachment-0001.htm>