[switch] Further unification on switch
forax at univ-mlv.fr
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Tue Apr 24 23:09:16 UTC 2018
first question,
do you prefer break syntax or -> syntax
119 for break, 173 for ->
second question,
do you prefer break syntax, -> syntax or ':' + expression syntax
43 for break, 94 for ->, 155 for ':' + expr
Rémi
> De: "Brian Goetz" <brian.goetz at oracle.com>
> À: "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr>
> Cc: "amber-spec-experts" <amber-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Mardi 24 Avril 2018 08:51:25
> Objet: Re: [switch] Further unification on switch
> What did your poll say?
>> On Apr 23, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Remi Forax < [ mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr |
>> forax at univ-mlv.fr ] > wrote:
>> the fact that nobody among the conference attendees i've discussed with seem to
>> care
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/attachments/20180425/c510f507/attachment.html>
More information about the amber-spec-experts
mailing list