break seen as a C archaism

[Kevin Bourrillion]

Okay that was a derp on my part, thanks.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:14 AM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> Part of it is the ability to embed a number of statements inside an
> expression (please, at least require curly braces, but still).
>
>
> Well, we do, look again!  The switch as a whole requires the curlies you
> want.
>
> I'm not being completely flip here.  If we feel a need for for more
> curlies inside
> the existing curlies, I think we may be at risk for this syndrome:
>
> Making new language features #{ Stand Out }
> http://gafter.blogspot.com/2017/06/making-new-language-
> features-stand-out.html
>
> — John
>



-- 
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/attachments/20180314/bdc0a141/attachment-0001.html>