Draft specification for java.lang.Record

Stuart Marks stuart.marks at oracle.com
Tue Aug 20 23:46:48 UTC 2019


It might be worth also saying something about finalization. I think the choices 
are to do nothing (be finalizer-agnostic) or to prohibit it. Generating a 
finalize() method for every record class seems like a non-starter.

I'm leaning toward prohibiting finalization, for a couple reasons. First, 
Object.finalize() is deprecated, and finalization will eventually be removed, so 
we'd like to discourage new code from using finalizers. Second, if a 
user-provided record constructor throws an exception, the partially-initialized 
record instance will be visible to the finalizer and it potentially can be 
resurrected. This seems like a really bad idea.

Suggestion:


/**
  * Finalization of record class instances is disallowed.
  *
  * @implSpec
  * This method implementation does nothing.
  */
protected final void finalize() { }


s'marks


On 8/15/19 10:34 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> 
> 
> Re-sending as plain text, since the formatting got mangled by mailers.
> 
> 
> /*
>   * Copyright (c) 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>   * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
>   *
>   * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>   * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.  Oracle designates this
>   * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
>   * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
>   *
>   * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>   * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>   * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
>   * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
>   * accompanied this code).
>   *
>   * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
>   * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
>   * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
>   *
>   * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
>   * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
>   * questions.
>   */
> package java.lang;
> 
> /**
>   * This is the common base class of all Java language record classes.
>   *
>   * <p>More information about records, including descriptions of the
>   * implicitly declared methods synthesized by the compiler, can be
>   * found in section 8.10 of
>   * <cite>The Java™ Language Specification</cite>.
>   *
>   * <p>A <em>record class</em> is a shallowly immutable, transparent carrier for
>   * a fixed set of values, called the <em>record components</em>.  The Java™
>   * language provides concise syntax for declaring record classes, whereby the
>   * record components are declared in the record header.  The list of record
>   * components declared in the record header form the <em>record descriptor</em>.
>   *
>   * <p>A record class has the following mandated members: a public <em>canonical
>   * constructor</em>, whose descriptor is the same as the record descriptor;
>   * a private static field corresponding to each component, whose name and
>   * type are the same as that of the component; a public accessor method
>   * corresponding to each component, whose name and return type are the same as
>   * that of the component.  If not explicitly declared in the body of the record,
>   * implicit implementations for these members are provided.
>   *
>   * <p>The implicit declaration of the canonical constructor initializes the
>   * component fields from the corresponding constructor arguments. The implicit
>   * declaration of the accessor methods returns the value of the corresponding
>   * component field.  The implicit declaration of the {@link 
> Object#equals(Object)},
>   * {@link Object#hashCode()}, and {@link Object#toString()} methods are derived
>   * from all of the component fields.
>   *
>   * <p>The primary reasons to provide an explicit declaration for the
>   * canonical constructor or accessor methods are to validate constructor
>   * arguments, perform defensive copies on mutable components, or normalize groups
>   * of components (such as reducing a rational number to lowest terms.) If any
>   * of these are provided explicitly.
>   *
>   * <p>For all record classes, the following invariant must hold: if a record R's
>   * components are {@code c1, c2, ... cn}, then if a record instance is copied
>   * as follows:
>   * <pre>
>   *     R copy = new R(r.c1(), r.c2(), ..., r.cn());
>   * </pre>
>   * then it must be the case that {@code r.equals(copy)}.
>   *
>   * @jls 8.10
>   * @since 14
>   */
> public abstract class Record {
>      /**
>       * Indicates whether some other object is "equal to" this one.  In addition
>       * to the general contract of {@link Object#equals(Object)},
>       * record classes must further participate in the invariant that when
>       * a record instance is "copied" by passing the result of the record component
>       * accessor methods to the canonical constructor, the resulting copy is
>       * equal to the original instance.
>       *
>       * @implNote
>       * The implicitly provided implementation returns {@code true} if and
>       * only if the argument is an instance of the same record type as this object,
>       * and each component of this record is equal to the corresponding component
>       * of the argument, according to {@link Object#equals(Object)} for components
>       * whose types are reference types, and {@code ==} for components whose
>       * types are primitive types.
>       *
>       * @see Object#equals(Object)
>       *
>       * @param   obj   the reference object with which to compare.
>       * @return  {@code true} if this object is the same as the obj
>       *          argument; {@code false} otherwise.
>       */
>      @Override
>      public abstract boolean equals(Object obj);
> 
>      /**
>       * {@inheritDoc}
>       *
>       * @implNote
>       * The implicitly provided implementation returns a hash code value derived
>       * by combining the hash code value for all the components, according to
>       * {@link Object#hashCode()} for components whose types are reference types,
>       * or the primitive wrapper hash code for components whose types are primitive
>       * types.
>       *
>       * @see     Object#hashCode()
>       *
>       * @return  a hash code value for this object.
>       */
>      @Override
>      public abstract int hashCode();
> 
>      /**
>       * {@inheritDoc}
>       *
>       * @implNote
>       * The implicitly provided implementation returns a string that is derived
>       * from the name of the record class and the names and string representations
>       * of all the components, according to {@link Object#toString()} for 
> components
>       * whose types are reference types, and the primitive wrapper {@code toString}
>       * method for components whose types are primitive types.
>       *
>       * @see     Object#toString() ()
>       *
>       * @return  a string representation of the object.
>       */
>      @Override
>      public abstract String toString();
> }



More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list