Clarifying record reflective support

[Alex Buckley]

On 12/3/2019 8:49 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> So,
> 
> Fine: "isRecord returns true if the class extends java.lang.Record
> and has a Record attribute." (a little more detailed than most
> reflection methods, but that's probably good)
> 
> Overkill: "isRecord returns true if the class extends
> java.lang.Record and has a Record attribute that conforms to the
> following rules ..."

Yes. "has a Record attribute" is the most that the broadly-read API spec 
should admit about the class file. Even "has a *well-formed* Record 
attribute" would be too much, since it quickly devolves into your 
overkill scenario.

Alex