Clarifying record reflective support

[John Rose]

On Dec 3, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> My general feeling about the reflection API is that it could do a better job of specifying behavior for the full space of class files, not just those produced by javac. I wouldn't mind a lot more discussion about class file artifacts like attributes. The API javadoc seems like the best place for this. But the status quo is to be vague, and if we're going to raise the bar on precision in reflection API documentation, that's best handled as an independent, holistic effort.

I agree, subject to priorities and who has time to work on what.
Let’s file a tracking issue for this, shall we?
That’s probably the best way to stabilize a consensus.

— John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/attachments/20191203/79076925/attachment.html>