Reminder about draft specs
Gavin Bierman
gavin.bierman at oracle.com
Sat Nov 9 10:50:59 UTC 2019
Yes, that needs correcting. Let me tweak - will send another message when it’s completed.
Thanks,
Gavin
> On 8 Nov 2019, at 17:11, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Gavin,
>
>> On 8 Nov 2019, at 15:28, Gavin Bierman <gavin.bierman at oracle.com <mailto:gavin.bierman at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep359/jep359-20191031/specs/records-jls.html <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep359/jep359-20191031/specs/records-jls.html>
> Looks good. A comment relating to Serialization, from section 8.10.1 - Record Components.
>
> As all record types are subclasses of the class java.lang.Record which in turn implements the interface java.io.Serializable, it is necessary to …
>
>
> This is not true. j.i.Record does not implement Serializable. Not all records are serializable.
>
> A record may be serializable, if it implements the java.io <http://java.io/>.Serializable interface, but it is not required. For example,
>
> record SerializableFoo (int x, int y) implements java.io.Serializable { }
>
> Additionally, I thought that all serialization related magic members were to be restricted from being record component names ( they are just too odd and potentially confusing ) ? The spec has some, but not all. The complete list ( of 7 ) is: writeObject, readObject, readObjectNoData, writeReplace, readResolve, serialVersionUID, serialPersistentFields.
>
> -Chris.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/attachments/20191109/f6a079f1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the amber-spec-experts
mailing list