Draft JLS spec for records

[John Rose]

On Sep 3, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Tagir Valeev <amaembo at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't think so. A compact constructor (or require initializer, as you propose) could be not the only constructor. An instance initializer is convenient because it's added to every constructor, regardless of whether it's compact or not. So the new thing doesn't supersede the instance initializer and I see no good reason to explicitly disable it.

+1 on that.  That horse is out of the barn.  As I just said, though, we don’t want to give it new jobs, even though we could choose to do so.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/attachments/20190904/e666a4ac/attachment.html>