Sealed interfaces in qualified anonymous class instances - minor spec addition?

Manoj Palat manoj.palat at in.ibm.com
Sat Jun 20 14:32:32 UTC 2020


Wrong example - Please ignore the earlier mail.
realized that this scenario is covered under local classes to flag the error. - sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Manoj

-----Manoj Palat/India/IBM wrote: -----
To: amber-spec-experts at openjdk.java.net
From: Manoj Palat/India/IBM
Date: 06/20/2020 05:00PM
Subject: Sealed interfaces in qualified anonymous class instances - minor spec addition?

Hi,
>From jep 360 Section 15.9.1 [ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep360/jep360-20200526/specs/sealed-classes-jls.html#jls-15.9.1] second bullet, ie:
“If the class instance creation expression is qualified, then:
The Identifier in ClassOrInterfaceTypeToInstantiate must unambiguously denote an inner class that is accessible, non-final, non-sealed, not an enum type, and a member of the compile-time type of the Primary expression or the ExpressionN



More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list