Reviewing feedback on patterns in switch

[Mark Raynsford]

On 2022-02-16T10:49:19 -0500
Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

> One thing that we have, perhaps surprisingly, *not* gotten feedback on 
> is forcing all non-legacy switches (legacy type, legacy labels, 
> statement only) to be exhaustive.  I would have thought people would 
> complain about pattern switches needing to be exhaustive, but no one 
> has! So either no one has tried it, or we got away with it...
> 

I tried it and liked it. It didn't go unnoticed. :)

-- 
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com