Draft JLS spec for records
Vijay Lakshminarayanan
laksvij at hawk.iit.edu
Tue Aug 27 13:32:55 UTC 2019
Hi Gavin
>From the spec it seems there may be only one annotation against a
RecordComponent or against a constructor.
>From 8.10.1 Record Header
> RecordComponent: {Annotation} UnannType Identifier
and from 8.10.2
> CompactConstructorDeclaration: {Annotation} {ConstructorModifier} [TypeParameters] SimpleTypeName [Throws] ConstructorBody
Wouldn't the following be legal?
record NonNullName(@NotNull @NotModified StringBuilder name) {
@JsonCreator @XmlCreator @BsonCreator public NonNegativePoint { ... }
}
Thanks
Vijay
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:12 PM Gavin Bierman <gavin.bierman at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Added.
>
> > On 26 Aug 2019, at 16:25, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The listing of serialPersistentFields seems fine too, again possible collision with the record component field.
> >>
> >> serialVersionUID is static, so doesn't need to need to be listed. Ok.
> >
> > You can’t have two fields with the same name, even if one is static and the other is not. So sVUID should stay on the list.
> >
>
More information about the amber-spec-observers
mailing list