Revisit the String template syntax
Cay Horstmann
cay.horstmann at gmail.com
Sat Apr 15 09:16:05 UTC 2023
On 15/04/2023 10.28, forax at univ-mlv.fr wrote:
> The real question is more, do we want two syntax for conceptually the same thing or not ?
>
> Here is an example with an annotation,
>
> @Bean
> class SpringBean {
>
> @Value("${myproperty}")
> private String myproperty;
>
> public void foo() {
> System.out.println(STR."myproperty: ${myproperty}");
> }
> }
>
>
I had to remind myself at https://www.baeldung.com/spring-value-annotation what @Value does. There is an ad-hoc syntax with ${key} and ${key: default} and #{...}. This is undoubtedly useful and clever, but it's the Spring useful-and-clever way.
To me, the distinction between \{} and ${} (and friends such as #{}) is meaningful. The former is a standard Java mechanism. The latter are handled by some library, and the only way to find out what they do is to consult the library documentation.
Cheers,
Cay
--
Cay S. Horstmann | http://horstmann.com | mailto:cay at horstmann.com
More information about the amber-spec-observers
mailing list