CFV: Dissolve the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project

[Jonathan Gibbons]

The CFV on "Dissolve the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project [1] has now 
concluded.

Valid votes cast by Project Members per the census [2] are :
Yes: 1
No: 0
Veto: 0

According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus [3], this is 
sufficient to
dissolve the project.

The project resources such as project web page [4],  email list [5]
and source code repository [6] will be deleted/archived/made read-only 
as appropriate,
and the project removed from the OpenJDK census [2].

-- Jon

[1] 
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/anno-pipeline-dev/2020-January/000094.html
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#anno-pipeline
[3] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus
[4] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/anno-pipeline/
[5] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/anno-pipeline-dev/
[6] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/anno-pipeline


On 01/24/2020 02:25 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> According to section 6 of the bylaws [1], the Committers of a Project may
> decide, by Lazy Consensus, to request that a Project should be
> dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A
> dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed.
>
> The work that was done in this Project has been integrated into the
> mainline JDK project, and this mailing list has been inactive since
> November 2016, except for a suggestion that it should be archived,
> in May 2019.
>
> I therefore propose that the Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project [2] 
> should be dissolved.
>
> Votes are due by 2pm PDT, 7th February 2020
>
> Only current Annotations Pipeline 2.0 Project Committers [3] are 
> eligible to vote.
>
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
>
> -- Jon
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6
> [2] https://openjdk.java.net/projects/anno-pipeline
> [3] https://openjdk.java.net/census#anno-pipeline
>